Also
@Joygirl I find your position that you are okay with policy lynching Ekko to be very non-committal, and underscores the idea that you wouldn't be voting based on him being scummy, but on policy, which can be considered a soft defence in that is attempts to purport that the reasons are not as valid as a genuine case built on him.
You've said really very little around Ekko, I think you two definitely have scum equity between the both of you based on all of this. Which isn't to say if Ekko flips Mafia you must be scum with him, but sooner or later I'd like to see you actually defending what I'm pulling up here.