Nami was heavily involved in the main themes of damn near every arc.
this is bullcrap, compared to the main players of the arc she is pretty much just a side kick and if you don't count the generic good hearted heroine troupe she was unnecessary for the arc
Fishman island = Victim of racism/ resolution with Jimbei.
only one i agree with, the theme of the arc incorporated her pretty good
Punk Hazard = Saved and freed the kidnapped, drugged, and experimented on children.
and? That's it. All she did was free some brats, they hardly had any relevance except to make CC look bad, she is just your generic good hearted children loving women. You can't make a heroine more bland
It was Sanji who saved Kinemon, it was Luffy who saved Momo, it was Law who started the yongo saga with his mountain cut
Zou = Was the most highlighted strawhat, she was narrating the Sanji flashback.
If your competition is chopper and brook, it's really not a feat, aside from narrating it, all she did was play the good hearted women again
WCI = Emotional anchor throughout the entire arc, when Luffy was fighting Katakuri she was the one giving the strawhats a reminder on respecting the Captain's order. She was also pivotal in taking down a sweet commander.
emotional anchor?! You can't be serious, she was pretty much a plot tool so luffy and Sanjis conflict can play out better
While luffy saw through Sanji, all she did was being a crybaby and playing into Sanji retarded charade
Her contribution to the cracker fight was being the holder of the vivre card from lola
And on the sunny she was overshadowed by jinbei who wasn't even a SH back then
She isn't heavily involved in the main themes of most arcs, she is always just the same, being reduced to a kind hearted women