Future Events Who will fight stronger opponents in future?
- Thread starter zorobeatsmid
- Start date
Main characters obviously.
Luffy will directly challenge the WG soon and other yonko before. What the hell are law and kidd going to do to have matching opponents.
Zoro's opponents are looking like:
- Beckman ( rhp if they fight)
- shyriuu ( bb pk fight)
- mihawk ( wss fight)
- admiral or high up WG official ( last series fight)
Sanji's opponents look like:
- lucky roo (rhp if they fight)
- kuzan ( bb pk fight)
- a admirals (last fight of the series)
most I see Kidd and law getting is being part of the last a alliance and taking on a admiral individually and that's something Sanji can also do. There just isn't enough strong guys unless oda adds more for Kidd and law to do fight. Zoro and Sanji are going to be fight yc1 to top tier here on out for major fights.
Luffy will directly challenge the WG soon and other yonko before. What the hell are law and kidd going to do to have matching opponents.
Zoro's opponents are looking like:
- Beckman ( rhp if they fight)
- shyriuu ( bb pk fight)
- mihawk ( wss fight)
- admiral or high up WG official ( last series fight)
Sanji's opponents look like:
- lucky roo (rhp if they fight)
- kuzan ( bb pk fight)
- a admirals (last fight of the series)
most I see Kidd and law getting is being part of the last a alliance and taking on a admiral individually and that's something Sanji can also do. There just isn't enough strong guys unless oda adds more for Kidd and law to do fight. Zoro and Sanji are going to be fight yc1 to top tier here on out for major fights.
It honestly is dependent on where Law and Kids characters go. Now that their alliance with luffy is done it’s up to oda to:
1. Write them out of the story like he did with Bege once his alliance was done
2. Find a way to bring them back which if that’s the case, what was the point of ending the alliance in the first palcd
1. Write them out of the story like he did with Bege once his alliance was done
2. Find a way to bring them back which if that’s the case, what was the point of ending the alliance in the first palcd
If Onigashima is any indication, it's that their infamy (bounty) is rather irrelevant to their performance anyway.
Law was involved in Doffy's fight yet it was mostly Luffy's win. Law got same bounty.
Kidd and Law 2v1'd BM and won via bombs and got same bounty as Luffy who 1v1'd Kaido in final conclusion and won by his own merit.
As long as Law and Kidd are involved, they'll get the infamy as their status as SN trio captains alone no matter whatever the fuck they do.
Law was involved in Doffy's fight yet it was mostly Luffy's win. Law got same bounty.
Kidd and Law 2v1'd BM and won via bombs and got same bounty as Luffy who 1v1'd Kaido in final conclusion and won by his own merit.
As long as Law and Kidd are involved, they'll get the infamy as their status as SN trio captains alone no matter whatever the fuck they do.
kid and law did win on their own merit; they threw big mom into magma, which is the main thing that KO’d her.
what you say makes no sense. In both cases, kid and law played major roles that allowed their infamy to rival Luffy’s. They also fought people stronger than the people zoro and sanji fought.
what you say makes no sense. In both cases, kid and law played major roles that allowed their infamy to rival Luffy’s. They also fought people stronger than the people zoro and sanji fought.
What did Law do vs Doflamingo that granted him 500m bounty? Hell, Doflamingo said he was mostly healed before G4 rolled up. He essentially landed a big attack then went out of the fight to the sidelines before the final battle even started (G4 vs Doffy). A different version of essentially what Zoro did on Rooftop.
But he got the infamy, because him just being there made WG conclude he was equally responsible for Doffy's fall.
Just like how WG assumed Kidd, Luffy, and Law are all equally responsible for BM + Kaido's fall and gave them a bounty who's sum is close to Kaido + BM's bounty sum.
As long as Kidd and Law are present in a big event, they'll get the infamy of that event close to Luffy's, if not same, despite doing far less.
But he got the infamy, because him just being there made WG conclude he was equally responsible for Doffy's fall.
Just like how WG assumed Kidd, Luffy, and Law are all equally responsible for BM + Kaido's fall and gave them a bounty who's sum is close to Kaido + BM's bounty sum.
As long as Kidd and Law are present in a big event, they'll get the infamy of that event close to Luffy's, if not same, despite doing far less.
what are you trying to say? That Oda will have them do nothing but get a bounty raise anyways? Why?
if this is the last saga, then Luffy doesn’t have time to beat every single enemy.
if teach is the main antagonist, kid and law fight admirals. If the admirals are the main antagonist, then the two fight kong and sengoku. If Imu is the main antagonist, then they fight the gorosei.
But I cannot understand how you see a scenario where they just do nothing.
if this is the last saga, then Luffy doesn’t have time to beat every single enemy.
if teach is the main antagonist, kid and law fight admirals. If the admirals are the main antagonist, then the two fight kong and sengoku. If Imu is the main antagonist, then they fight the gorosei.
But I cannot understand how you see a scenario where they just do nothing.
