When does "mastering" haki hold any relevance to an individual character's Haki capabilities?
Once again with the Fishman CoC example and to add, Kaido vs Luffy.
Dispite holding his own in Haki clashes with Kaido (showing their "mastery" ) Luffy eventually got overpowered I'n Haki clashes once Kaido started putting in more effort.
you don't get it at all, just the fact that you use haki means you are not a "pure swordsman" anymore and by default means you can neg Mihawk in a fight
-mihawk was known as the marine hunter when he wasn’t a shibi
-mihawk fans making memes, hyping him up for the ephit
-literally in a guild that bounty hunts marines.
Didnt you say the only reason Zoro was knocking out people was because of Enma?
Big Mom, Kaidou and Luffy who had CoC for years was doing the same thing as Zoro
lol then take kaido one has a strength and haki.Do you think he can be a swordsman. Same with luffy. Bigmom is never mentioned as swordsmen even though she uses sword. Don't give me that shit i gave a more examples if you want.
...he was seconds away from passing out sweating and drooling while Shanks was outside the island, imagine if Shanks was 10-20 feet from him, he'd probably pass out immediately.
Oda has made it clear that Admirals are gag characters, their purpose is to serve as hypetools for the actual important characters like the Yonko and Supernova
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.