World War 3
- Thread starter TheAncientCenturion
- Start date
Do you people realise that any weapon which gets crashed gets analysed thoroughly to see what tech has been used and how electronics are?
Russia was not expecting much resistance from Ukraine so it's naive to think Russia used it's advanced tech in this war
Infact, from reports of analysis of most of the stuffs like crashed missiles it was revealed that most of the equipments either belonged to 1990's or belonged to the west and got exported to Russia after 2014 despite sanctions being there on Russia since it's Crimea invasion.
This is important because it indicates that Russia used weapons made by tech from west on Ukraine
Russia was not expecting much resistance from Ukraine so it's naive to think Russia used it's advanced tech in this war
Infact, from reports of analysis of most of the stuffs like crashed missiles it was revealed that most of the equipments either belonged to 1990's or belonged to the west and got exported to Russia after 2014 despite sanctions being there on Russia since it's Crimea invasion.
This is important because it indicates that Russia used weapons made by tech from west on Ukraine
F
I'm trying to understand your logic.
Fearsome NATO would rekt Russia.
Russia attacks Ukraine before they can apply for EU.
NATO does nothing but sends some weaponry.
If NATO is so fearsome and powerful why they don't put an end to this? Not many lives been lost yet or what?
Y'all really believe in some NATO shield over countries that are involved.
Fearsome NATO would rekt Russia.
Russia attacks Ukraine before they can apply for EU.
NATO does nothing but sends some weaponry.
If NATO is so fearsome and powerful why they don't put an end to this? Not many lives been lost yet or what?
Y'all really believe in some NATO shield over countries that are involved.
Because world leaders
1. run on public support and rousing people to go to war and die is hardly going to help their images.
2. the average person would not support large scale wars, it's easier to justify giving weapons and aid than to send people to die.
3. Nuclear options lol. That's the only thing keeping Russia relevant.
1. run on public support and rousing people to go to war and die is hardly going to help their images.
2. the average person would not support large scale wars, it's easier to justify giving weapons and aid than to send people to die.
3. Nuclear options lol. That's the only thing keeping Russia relevant.
F
Just give up. I can't take you seriously.
Russia did not use its advanced tech and forces yet. Everyone knows this. Thinking otherwise is equal to watching TikToks making fun of Russians leaving their tanks and etc...
That's how you brainwash people online.
Don't tell me that I was right when Russia takes this war more seriously in the future.
Russia did not use its advanced tech and forces yet. Everyone knows this. Thinking otherwise is equal to watching TikToks making fun of Russians leaving their tanks and etc...
That's how you brainwash people online.
Don't tell me that I was right when Russia takes this war more seriously in the future.
?