Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1069 Spoilers Discussion

Who will fight Kizaru ?


  • Total voters
    329
Status
Not open for further replies.
It must suck to be Lucci
>be an orphan
>get sold to the WG
>train all your life to be as strong as you can be, because that’s the only way your life will have any value
>get beat by this shitty rubber boy who hasn’t worked half as hard as you, just because he has the special god fruit
Bullshit logic. Luffy went life and death trials more than Lucci ever did. Being a genocidal maniac doesn't make you hardworking person.
 
So you know that is bad writing and yet you don't want to admit it because it contradicts your statement that there are no fundamental metric in story telling. Story telling has fundamental rules dude. You can't just randomly write whatever you want and call it good writing.
99.999 percent would agree that would suck. But that's our objective truth that we would all agree upon. Objectivity means something completley different. It's just what it means. OBJECTIVE TRUTHS OF REALITY. Fundamental rules of nature. But yes my brain rotted love, I do think that would be bad writing. But it's all based on my subjective truth of what I consider right and wrong, which us humans have agreed upon that is bad. Same thing would happen as most writers out there would agree oda is a good writer. But you don't agree with that, because that's your subjective opinion. And that's fine teddy bear.
 
He's a sociopath then.
Post automatically merged:

@lee33 Art is all about interpretation dude. And interpretation is SUBJECTIVE by definition! rules in storytelling come and go as the medium evolves. Objective truths never change, they are universal truths. 2+2=4, the earth is round, your mom sucked my dick. THOSE are objective truths.
:kobeha:
 
It's crazy that someone as confident and ruthless as Lucci backs down and immediately says they should flee after not even 1 chapter of fighting
:kobeha:
Luffy really terrified one of the most ruthless characters in the verse into submission
 
If Oda wrote Luffy raping Nami next chapter is that good writing to you? And then in the next chapter Oda wrote Naruto and Sasuke raping Luffy, is that good writing to you? And in the next chapter Oda just wrote "hi, how are you guys doing today, I don't want to write One Piece because I am too lazy to day so I am going to just write a bunch of nonsense of Luffy just raping every character". Since there are no objective metrics, then that means that can be considered good writing, right? You see where I am going with this? There are fundamental rules in story telling dude.
Your points suck ass dude. Take the L and stop reading One Piece if you have so much problems with it. You coming here repeating the same bitchass nonsensical jibberish wouldn't change the outcome. Nobody gives a twat about what you feel and you don't decide what is or isn't a good writing so sod off to Nartoshitverse.
 
Your points suck ass dude. Take the L and stop reading One Piece if you have so much problems with it. You coming here repeating the same bitchass nonsensical jibberish wouldn't change the outcome. Nobody gives a twat about what you feel and you don't decide what is or isn't a good writing so sod off to Nartoshitverse.
Bro the american school system has rotted the brains of our youth. They can't grasp middle school level concepts. Thank god I moved here when I was already 14.
 
99.999 percent would agree that would suck. But that's our objective truth that we would all agree upon. Objectivity means something completley different. It's just what it means. OBJECTIVE TRUTHS OF REALITY. Fundamental rules of nature. But yes my brain rotted love, I do think that would be bad writing. But it's all based on my subjective truth of what I consider right and wrong, which us humans have agreed upon that is bad. Same thing would happen as most writers out there would agree oda is a good writer. But you don't agree with that, because that's your subjective opinion. And that's fine teddy bear.
dude there is no convincing them you are just wasting brain power. it isnt worth
 
99.999 percent would agree that would suck. But that's our objective truth that we would all agree upon. Objectivity means something completley different. It's just what it means. OBJECTIVE TRUTHS OF REALITY. Fundamental rules of nature. But yes my brain rotted love, I do think that would be bad writing. But it's all based on my subjective truth of what I consider right and wrong, which us humans have agreed upon that is bad. Same thing would happen as most writers out there would agree oda is a good writer. But you don't agree with that, because that's your subjective opinion. And that's fine teddy bear.
Let us just agree to disagree. I believe there are fundamental rules writers do follow to be considered good writing because if there isn't then anything can be considered good writing just because some person out of the 7 billion people on this planet may like it. If you don't believe that then by all means don't.
 
Let us just agree to disagree. I believe there are fundamental rules writers do follow to be considered good writing because if there isn't then anything can be considered good writing just because some person out of the 7 billion people on this planet may like it. If you don't believe that then by all means don't.
YES! that's what it's all about. We agree that we disagree on what good and bad writing is! cause that's our subjective perspective! So close yet so far.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top