- Status
I
Yeah. It‘s like, so weird. Because I feel like there has to be scum, but at the same time it‘s possible it‘s just White Kingdom vs Black Kingdom as well, so what should we even do here 
? The funny thing is I feel lost af, though.
? The funny thing is I feel lost af, though.
If there is scum out there, we have almost no way to hunt them besides threadplay, and that in of itself is hard because we can't claim or hint at our actions
and if there isn't any scum team
is the game just gonna be randomly lynching and kingdoms shooting each other at night? wouldn't that be too simple / boring? especially based on what i've heard from you guys about AL's previous games
? This game is like Dark Souls mode during a blind playthrough.
I
I am here but my temptation to talk has been silenced by two players targeting me just for starting the day phase with a question. 
If you think you're being wrongly accused, you have to remember the people accusing you are either scum themselves or they are just not well informed
If you're a town player, you need to help them figure out why they are wrong and why they should remove those votes from you and go to someone else
Stay lurking and away makes you seem more scummy
I mean, the game design itself implies there has to be scum. No claiming only makes any sense when the game would be too easy to solve via actions and to protect the scums. And Al also implied this is more like traditional games with no full role flips. Though let‘s say there are scums it‘s still hard to solve because many aren‘t even posting enough to get good reads on them.
I am here but my temptation to talk has been silenced by two players targeting me just for starting the day phase with a question.
. If you‘re not the killer, then who do you think did the killing? Let‘s start with this.Al was right in saying this game is too much for a newbie. Not only me but experienced players are out of ideas into knowing what the game construct is exactly. We aren't sure whether its a Black v White or Black, White vs Scum. Killing one from each side has two possibilities. It can either be B v W or scums making it look like B vs W but hiding in the open.
S
I can't argue to the point I hadnt read the last x amount of pages.
On the other hand. People voting me are also not putting any effort in understanding.
You're voting me up for 'defending' Conq right?
The point is, Conq was being voted for liking posts and not posting.
Because of this I shared my recent experience with Conq and him being quiet. I have seen him doing this before, where he won as Jester. I also said to feel free to lynch him, but I am not taking the bait.
This was at the point where Conq didn't make a single post.
Later I pointed out the wagon on Conq is wrong if all you lynch him for is liking posts, when in reality he only liked the opening posts, and disappeared after. To me, your reason to lynch him was wrong.
Juliet made a perfectly clear post with what I meant by my post:
If you're still bothered by my post about being the lowest poster, I already said to take that with a grain of salt.
Why? Because I have been lynched multiple times by being one of the more inactive players.
A Lynch on me is another waste of a lynch, and none of the Sallu voters have showed me a solid case against me. Only 1 person replied and this was the reason:
I can't defend myself against a 'random' lynch only by telling you all that you make a huge mistake to go for me.
On the other hand. People voting me are also not putting any effort in understanding.
You're voting me up for 'defending' Conq right?
The point is, Conq was being voted for liking posts and not posting.
Because of this I shared my recent experience with Conq and him being quiet. I have seen him doing this before, where he won as Jester. I also said to feel free to lynch him, but I am not taking the bait.
This was at the point where Conq didn't make a single post.
Later I pointed out the wagon on Conq is wrong if all you lynch him for is liking posts, when in reality he only liked the opening posts, and disappeared after. To me, your reason to lynch him was wrong.
Juliet made a perfectly clear post with what I meant by my post:
If you're still bothered by my post about being the lowest poster, I already said to take that with a grain of salt.
Why? Because I have been lynched multiple times by being one of the more inactive players.
A Lynch on me is another waste of a lynch, and none of the Sallu voters have showed me a solid case against me. Only 1 person replied and this was the reason:
I can't defend myself against a 'random' lynch only by telling you all that you make a huge mistake to go for me.
- Status