I can't argue to the point I hadnt read the last x amount of pages.
On the other hand. People voting me are also not putting any effort in understanding.
You're voting me up for 'defending' Conq right?
The point is, Conq was being voted for liking posts and not posting.
Because of this I shared my recent experience with Conq and him being quiet. I have seen him doing this before, where he won as Jester. I also said to feel free to lynch him, but I am not taking the bait.
This was at the point where Conq didn't make a single post.
Later I pointed out the wagon on Conq is wrong if all you lynch him for is liking posts, when in reality he only liked the opening posts, and disappeared after. To me, your reason to lynch him was wrong.
Juliet made a perfectly clear post with what I meant by my post:
If you're still bothered by my post about being the lowest poster, I already said to take that with a grain of salt.
Why? Because I have been lynched multiple times by being one of the more inactive players.
A Lynch on me is another waste of a lynch, and none of the Sallu voters have showed me a solid case against me. Only 1 person replied and this was the reason:
I can't defend myself against a 'random' lynch only by telling you all that you make a huge mistake to go for me.