Then why not use different pronouns and leave male/female out of it?
For the same reason we can't exclude racism from social struggle discussion.

The same way racism exist and therefore people are being racialized, people are still looking at the spectrum of gender in a binary manner. So we can't create an entire new system out of nothing, it would just create confusion. We must get rid of the normative hegemony first.

Another exemple of that principle is patriarchy:

Because some of us are "deconstructed" we can't just do like patriarchy doesn't exist.. it still affect our lives and influence us. That's why we must reduce it to silence first .. and then.. we will be able to create an entirely new system.



They have hidden agendas, and it does not make sense on the surface level. But it is becoming clear the way they are pushing it on children.
No we don't.. but trying to explain why we don't would be meaningless as you clearly as a bias toward us. You are already convince that we are here for chaos.. so you can't listen.. you won't be able to.

To understand what we say, you will first need to reevaluate your position an try to actually listen and understand our reasonning.


They might eventually end up accepting bestiality, nudity in public, incest, etc. All these just because they have the 'consent'. Society with no morals standard will definitely collapse because they have nothing to fight for
The problem with what you are saying is that in the majority of your example, there is no consent:
- Incest - in majority - is done without consent.
- You can't get the consent of an animal so this is again without consent.

Your last example: "nudity in public" has nothing to do with morality. As nudity is not something that can harm people.
legalizing child p##n, social disorder, and confusing people
I think you watch too much conspiracy theorists. What you are quoting here is the first things the left is fighting against.

(I left out satanic practices as this is just the testimony of a religious mindset)
 
For the same reason we can't exclude racism from social struggle discussion.

The same way racism exist and therefore people are being racialized, people are still looking at the spectrum of gender in a binary manner. So we can't create an entire new system out of nothing, it would just create confusion. We must get rid of the normative hegemony first.

Another exemple of that principle is patriarchy:

Because some of us are "deconstructed" we can't just do like patriarchy doesn't exist.. it still affect our lives and influence us. That's why we must reduce it to silence first .. and then.. we will be able to create an entirely new system.




No we don't.. but trying to explain why we don't would be meaningless as you clearly as a bias toward us. You are already convince that we are here for chaos.. so you can't listen.. you won't be able to.

To understand what we say, you will first need to reevaluate your position an try to actually listen and understand our reasonning.



The problem with what you are saying is that in the majority of your example, there is no consent:
- Incest - in majority - is done without consent.
- You can't get the consent of an animal so this is again without consent.

Your last example: "nudity in public" has nothing to do with morality. As nudity is not something that can harm people.

I think you watch too much conspiracy theorists. What you are quoting here is the first things the left is fighting against.

(I left out satanic practices as this is just the testimony of a religious mindset)
Nudity in public is a huge problem
You guys need to understand that we’re a society and not everyone can do what they want
Be naked in your own home, I don’t care but I don’t want that my future children see naked people in public
 
Incest - in majority - is done without consent.
If they have consent, you think its okay?


You can't get the consent of an animal so this is again without consent
Never saw a dog or a horse getting aroused to their owner? If the owner plays along, you think this is okay?


Your last example: "nudity in public" has nothing to do with morality. As nudity is not something that can harm people.
It can. Youre exposing kids to that which have negative impact on the development of their frontal brain. There are plenty of studies in this area
 
Nudity in public is a huge problem
You guys need to understand that we’re a society and not everyone can do what they want
Uhm yeah it's not about 'not everyone can do what they want'
Nudity used to be completely normal and is only people who dress all the time are aroused by public nudity.
It's totally acquired.

Society with no morals standard will definitely collapse because they have nothing to fight for
Oh you...:blush::blush::blush::amazing::amazing::amazing: another Yukio Mishima enjoyer?

s still a major flaw that they often disregards their mora
Moral is 100% in our heads.
I love how conservatives accuse their political opponents of being amoral as a way to discredit their standpoints.
Makes y'all look even more intellectually dishonest that you already are.


Youre exposing kids to that which have negative impact on the development of their frontal brain. There are plenty of studies in this area
Link to these studies please.
 
Uhm yeah it's not about 'not everyone can do what they want'
Nudity used to be completely normal and is only people who dress all the time are aroused by public nudity.
It's totally acquired.


Oh you...:blush::blush::blush::amazing::amazing::amazing: another Yukio Mishima enjoyer?


Moral is 100% in our heads.
I love how conservatives accuse their political opponents of being amoral as a way to discredit their standpoints.
Makes y'all look even more intellectually dishonest that you already are.



Link to these studies please.
Nah total L opinion
 
Nudity in public is a huge problem
You guys need to understand that we’re a society and not everyone can do what they want
Be naked in your own home, I don’t care but I don’t want that my future children see naked people in public
It can. Youre exposing kids to that which have negative impact on the development of their frontal brain. There are plenty of studies in this area
Can you guys give us links to studies on the subject and explain us why native south american tribes (who sometimes lives naked) are not affected by those so called "bad side effects" of nudity ?


If they have consent, you think its okay?
As long as their are consenting adults and don't make babies, they do what they want I couldn't care less.


Never saw a dog or a horse getting aroused to their owner? If the owner plays along, you think this is okay?
Animals can't give consent, period.
 
Oh you...:blush::blush::blush::amazing::amazing::amazing: another Yukio Mishima enjoyer?
Who even is that person


Moral is 100% in our heads.
I love how conservatives accuse their political opponents of being amoral as a way to discredit their standpoints.
Makes y'all look even more intellectually dishonest that you already are.
???

It's not exclusive to conservatives or any group. That's inherent in any person. If you have a moral defined by your boundaries, and if exists someone whose moral is outside of your boundary, that person is automatically amoral in your perspective without the need of you to call them out. I dont know what are you trying to prove here lol


Link to these studies please
https://neurosciencenews.com/neuroscience-pornography-brain-15354/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010482520303024

Just read the conclusion

And many more available online
 
Can you guys give us links to studies on the subject and explain us why native south american tribes (who sometimes lives naked) are not affected by those bad side effects of nudity ?
Yes, I'd like some links

Hell, a hundred years people got aroused by naked knees and elbows.
:lawsigh: sexualization of nudity is acquired. And societies where everyone's is completely hidden under 4 layers of clothing aren't necessarily less sexualized or have lower sexual crime rates.
 
I was about to make a comment, but there is no scenario where i read 155 Pages of a WG thread.
Just read the recent pages ,the topics are evolving

Who even is that person




???

It's not exclusive to conservatives or any group. That's inherent in any person. If you have a moral defined by your boundaries, and if exists someone whose moral is outside of your boundary, that person is automatically amoral in your perspective without the need of you to call them out. I dont know what are you trying to prove here lol




https://neurosciencenews.com/neuroscience-pornography-brain-15354/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010482520303024

Just read the conclusion

And many more available online
Your articles are about pornography 🙄

Pornography = sexual acts and intentionally sexually arousing nudity

Again dude, nudity is not inherently sexual

Your sources do not disprove what I said, they merely show your limited will to engage with the.subject
 
The F. ??

We are asking for studies on the bad side effect of nudity in public (what you claimed was a bad thing) and you give us link to the effect of pornography on children.. :seriously::lawsigh:

Your articles are about pornography 🙄

Pornography = sexual acts and intentionally sexually arousing nudity

Again dude, nudity is not inherently sexual

Your sources do not disprove what I said, they merely show your limited will to engage with the.subject
?

Kids will never know pornography until their later life if they never get exposed to nudity lol? Thats clearly the correlation


As long as their are consenting adults and don't make babies, they do what they want I couldn't care less.
So youre okay if two people doing incest in public is okay as long as they are consent to it?

Lol ok


Animals can't give consent, period
Consent is merely a cooperation to willingly do something lol. If the animal like to get intimate, it means they are consent and it is as simple as that

Can you guys give us links to studies on the subject and explain us why native south american tribes (who sometimes lives naked) are not affected by those so called "bad side effects" of nudity ?
You are the one saying they are not affected, so youre the one needed to give the proof

Also, this is irrelevant, numerous studies have shown that what i said is factual and is happening in our society
 
Can you guys give us links to studies on the subject and explain us why native south american tribes (who sometimes lives naked) are not affected by those so called "bad side effects" of nudity ?



As long as their are consenting adults and don't make babies, they do what they want I couldn't care less.



Animals can't give consent, period.
Simple.Cultural differences.They are used from birth to seeing naked bodies,so they don't get aroused easily by nudity.We are not.Seeing naked bodies will bring some horny feelings and thoughts in 99.9% of people.That is a matter of social conditioning of course.
Post automatically merged:

What the fuck is going on in this thread?
 
Ok
Now join the valentine's event

I totally love how the most lewd perverts are the ones who are scared of nudity.
Cross, you were conditioned to believe nudity is sexual amd dangerous.
So was i
The difference is that you're susceptible to childhood brainwashing and I am not

Let's agree to disagree
Scarred? It’s just an inappropriate behaviour
There’s a reason why we’re wearing clothes
Ever heard of intimacy?
Ever heard of some kind of decency?
I really hope that some conservative values come back (and they will) because the woke bigots have clearly crossed the line


and btw I’m not a pervert just because I’m joking around in a forum
You don’t even know how my behaviour in real life is
 
Kids will never know pornography until their later life if they never get exposed to nudity lol? Thats clearly the correlation
Uhm.....what?
What's your point even?

Pornography is indeed harmful.
It's always the prudish and sexually repressed cultures that have the lewdest thoughts and the worst abusive shit going on behind closed doors

Please answer my question:
Are you sexually aroused by naked elbows and knees?


Consent is merely a cooperation to willingly do something lol. If the animal like to get intimate, it means they are consent and it is as simple as tha
Bruh stop being creepy
Animals cannot give consent in any way shape or form
Don't even try to go that route
 
There’s a reason why we’re wearing clothes
Yes, because of the cold and then it turned into a cultural custom.
Ever heard of some kind of decency?
Again, completely acquired.
It’s just an inappropriate behaviour
that's no universal definition, only that of YOUR CULTURE
Even today there are still communities where women are bare breasted or people wear less clothes overall.
They don't find any of this sexually arousing because they are used to it.
What will you tell these people? '''accept MY morals or you're indecent''?
 
Uhm.....what?
What's your point even?

Pornography is indeed harmful.
It's always the prudish and sexually repressed cultures that have the lewdest thoughts and the worst abusive shit going on behind closed doors

Please answer my question:
Are you sexually aroused by naked elbows and knees?
Obviously nope LOL, and do you realize that's not the nudity that i meant?

My point is if nudity is considered moral, kids will get more access to abusing this kind of thing

Bruh stop being creepy
Animals cannot give consent in any way shape or form
Don't even try to go that route
? Im merely stating your own logic lmao, that its all okay as long as consent is present

I dont know how you define consent, but dictionaries define consent exactly as what i said
 
Top