Is this the biggest single-chapter demolition of a character & fandom?


  • Total voters
    293
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Most zoro/king/mihawk stans or what yall want to go by don't even acknowledge s-hawk or any of the seraphim as being comparable to king

If they're significantly weaker than him even with s-hawk cutting Amazon lily that means the feat itself is hallow and meaningless

Something that hurts mihawk's hype not helps
WTF are you on about
King is more durable than S Hawk
S hawk has more AP

S Hawks attack seemed some what comparable to Bajrung gun tbh
 
yes because its broad .........
being a better swordsman doesnt imply you have better conquerors haki
doesnt imply you have better armament
its not a specific marker hence as I said its broad.

again what I said had nothing to do with whether or not shanks was a swordsman or not.
Without better Haki your sword will break.
It's literally a key factor in swordsmanship.

Anyways I read you second paragraph ,all ok.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top