Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Here ya go:
https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/1...mond-is-amazing-pretending-to-snort-ketamine/
Well, I guess Drag Queens *technically* aren't Trans, but otherwise, there's your answer. Frankly your demand is trivially easy to satisfy - there are countless examples of children being groomed online by adult (biological) men on discord, chatrooms, etc.
The Catholic Church does have a history. I personally have no qualms acknowledging this, but it is a deflection.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/1...mond-is-amazing-pretending-to-snort-ketamine/
Well, I guess Drag Queens *technically* aren't Trans, but otherwise, there's your answer. Frankly your demand is trivially easy to satisfy - there are countless examples of children being groomed online by adult (biological) men on discord, chatrooms, etc.
The Catholic Church does have a history. I personally have no qualms acknowledging this, but it is a deflection.
If you actually cared about child abuse, you’d look at these cases - one trans person doing a disgusting thing, and one entire religious organization methodically raping hundreds of children for six decades - and realize you’re comparing apples to oranges with festering chancres, but I guess someone snorting ketamine is more dangerous to the public than authority figures routinely molesting kids without consequence, you’ve made your point there.
Would you consider this statement valid for any demographic dominating a certain category of crime? I'm going to assume you wouldn't logically apply this same line of thinking to other groups, and that you would probably call someone else racist if they did.
How do you expect this to be actionable anyway? Ban white males from owning guns? lol
Uh...no...
Well, now you're moving the goalpost - you asked for an example and I provided one. I also said I had no issue with pointing out the abuses of the Catholic Church. This is Culture War fodder 101 - you're promoting the comparison to bash Christians, I get it. But it doesn't demand picking a side. I have no issue with saying nay to Drag Queen story hours and molesting preists.
How do you expect this to be actionable anyway? Ban white males from owning guns? lol
Post automatically merged:
Uh...no...
Well, now you're moving the goalpost - you asked for an example and I provided one. I also said I had no issue with pointing out the abuses of the Catholic Church. This is Culture War fodder 101 - you're promoting the comparison to bash Christians, I get it. But it doesn't demand picking a side. I have no issue with saying nay to Drag Queen story hours and molesting preists.
Moving the fucking goalpost, give me a break - 600 children were raped, and you’re focusing on a single trans kid doing drugs, do you really think these things are equal in societal impact?? It has less to do with the fact that this is happening in the Catholic church and more to do with the fact that KIDS ARE BEING MOLESTED ON A MAJOR SCALE and you’re deflecting instead of condemning this disgusting behavior. For people who always cry about liberal misconduct, y’all never seem to mind during the many, MANY other instances of conservatives diddling kids!!
You haven’t said a single thing about how horrible it is to learn about 600 children being molested, you just posted a link to the fucking Federalist and started in with the usual “both sides do it” rhetoric. When you can’t drop your politics long enough to acknowledge when something is objectively offensive, your priorities are so fucked up that it becomes impossible to take you seriously, because you can’t even speak against something unassailably evil when it doesn’t fit your narrative.
Yes, I did. In my first post. I'll make it more explicit - I don't think positively of the institution whatsoever. But still, it's irrelevant to your point of "show me a single case".
...Is it rhetoric if it's demonstrably true? What's the issue here
Think you're demonstrating this point better than I am - instead of addressing what I showed you, you've gone into hysterics about the catholic church, that I didn't even contest. Seems like you've got a drum to beat, actually. I've got no qualms calling evil what it is *shrugs*
This is...a wildly out of touch standpoint. Am I correct to assume you think all demographic disparities in crime are due to misreporting except in the specific case of white males committing mass shootings? Jee, that sure is convenient.
No offense, but you're fucking dumb if you believe this. Sorry. Can't really cross the bridge any other way.
And more to the point - do you think that it's ok to make widespread assumptions/condemnation about demographics regardless of the statistics? The answer should still be no.
...Is it rhetoric if it's demonstrably true? What's the issue here
Think you're demonstrating this point better than I am - instead of addressing what I showed you, you've gone into hysterics about the catholic church, that I didn't even contest. Seems like you've got a drum to beat, actually. I've got no qualms calling evil what it is *shrugs*
Post automatically merged:
This is...a wildly out of touch standpoint. Am I correct to assume you think all demographic disparities in crime are due to misreporting except in the specific case of white males committing mass shootings? Jee, that sure is convenient.
No offense, but you're fucking dumb if you believe this. Sorry. Can't really cross the bridge any other way.
And more to the point - do you think that it's ok to make widespread assumptions/condemnation about demographics regardless of the statistics? The answer should still be no.
You’re right, you showed me a case…and in the process, you decided 600 kids getting raped is roughly equal to one trans person doing something to themselves, that’s the problem. Go ahead and say that isn’t what you’re doing, you’ve already chosen to whitewash child molestation so you don’t really have anything left to lose.
Again, the issue is that “both sides” doesn’t work when one side is individualized and the other is foundational for an entire group of people. If a trans person kills someone with a handgun and a MAGA supporter lights up an entire grocery store with an assault rifle, that’s not exactly the same thing, right?? Can you at least see what’s wrong now?? Whether you agree or not, do you have the cognitive abilities to realize why one is a little more dangerous than the other??
Well, you haven’t actually done it once in the course of defending pedophiles who probably vote the same way you do, so par for the fucking course there.
Again, the issue is that “both sides” doesn’t work when one side is individualized and the other is foundational for an entire group of people. If a trans person kills someone with a handgun and a MAGA supporter lights up an entire grocery store with an assault rifle, that’s not exactly the same thing, right?? Can you at least see what’s wrong now?? Whether you agree or not, do you have the cognitive abilities to realize why one is a little more dangerous than the other??
Well, you haven’t actually done it once in the course of defending pedophiles who probably vote the same way you do, so par for the fucking course there.
Let me educate you on what a "deflection" is.
You made a point:
Which I addressed, while also preemptively assuring you I'm not defending the catholic church.
You then proceed to go into a hysterical rant about the catholic church, and that I'm defending pedophiles, because you don't know how to do anything but reiterate this point that you thought was extremely insightful, over and over again.
*That* is deflection on your part. lol
You made a point:
Which I addressed, while also preemptively assuring you I'm not defending the catholic church.
You then proceed to go into a hysterical rant about the catholic church, and that I'm defending pedophiles, because you don't know how to do anything but reiterate this point that you thought was extremely insightful, over and over again.
*That* is deflection on your part. lol
You’re the one who immediately accused me of making it about the church, buddy…
…whereas I was more focused on the child rape aspect, something you’re STILL not actually condemning in any meaningful way. I’ve only ever seen you proselytize about Jesus on this forum, how about you start acting like him and call out disgusting behavior in your camp instead of bitching about isolated incidents among the trans community?? He was about love and acceptance in all scenarios, and yet I haven’t met a single Christian who actually practices the preaching.
…whereas I was more focused on the child rape aspect, something you’re STILL not actually condemning in any meaningful way. I’ve only ever seen you proselytize about Jesus on this forum, how about you start acting like him and call out disgusting behavior in your camp instead of bitching about isolated incidents among the trans community?? He was about love and acceptance in all scenarios, and yet I haven’t met a single Christian who actually practices the preaching.