ROOTBEER TRIAL

Is he insane?

  • Total voters
    17
Rootbeer

Rootbeer

‎
#26
#26
Mr. Reloaded said:
:pepestop:
Defendant you have been accused of several crimes including
Denial of Zoro's AdvCoC
Ambient energy
Converging and diverging

Please present your case. And may God have mercy on @Infitima :ihaha:​
Click to expand...
I want to remove Ambient Energy of the Charges your Honor.. Instead i would like to put AdCoC is not a power related to Swordsmen going for the WSS path..

Or another choice can be Blowing Balloon vs Pushing Cushion..:luffydab:
 
Infitima

Infitima

‎
#30
#30
1.He's not guilty. It's an opinion. He's entitled to his opinion. Just like you could say Luffy actually attacks with string cheese that looks like rubber. You don't have to back up an opinion, that's why we call it an opinion.

He isn't trying to put it into the canon book of Oda, which only Oda can do.

2. Only Oda can state what any of the Haki indicators are. Until he outright states in an SBS, interview, or characters mouths what CoC and ACoC look like, everyone is right and everyone is wrong. Law of Oda allows for all.

3. He kept you entertained for break week, be grateful you brats.
 
Mr. Reloaded

Mr. Reloaded

Professional backstabber
‎
#34
#34
Infitima said:
He said Zoro had CoC, he didn't say 'this is how Haki looks in all instances, this is this type, this is the other type.'
Click to expand...
Oda does not need to treat his audience like babies who can't comprehend.Does he really need to spell this out?:pepecafe:
Infitima said:
You cannot write Law from inferences. For all we know, Oda could just like drawing cool things differently in different fights.
Click to expand...
Draws the same squiggly lines everytime someone used Coating. Must just be drawing something cool with zero meaning :milaugh:
 
Infitima

Infitima

‎
#35
#35
Mr. Reloaded said:
Oda does not need to treat his audience like babies who can't comprehend.Does he really need to spell this out?:pepecafe:

Draws the same squiggly lines everytime someone used Coating. Must just be drawing something cool with zero meaning :milaugh:
Click to expand...
That's not the point. You made this a court case. A case can't be decided just because you infer it. It has to be clearly stated facts and the fact of the matter is, Oda has not outright stated it in clarity to be fact.

You can argue what things look like or similarities, or repetition all you want. It's still not clarified by the author into lore or outside questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top