Turkish elections are in 4 days now.

How do you think Erdogan will keep the power ?

1/ Win the election
2/ Bloodbath from Erdogan on everyone
3/ Rigged elections ever more than before
As a Turk i know Erdogan most likely will lose if he doesnt pull some tricks.
Him rigging the elections is not a thing because we are all very careful about it. Of course he will steal but not that much is my assumption.
My prediction is that he may try a coup. According to Soylu's talk but i doubt it. We will win this time.
Post automatically merged:

The will try to rig the elections but they’ll not succeed because the opposing parties will not allow it
Some Erdogan followers tried to vote a second time but they got caught on camera
:ihaha:
All I can say is that
- the younger Generation hates Erdogan. They have enough and even stay away from religion. Some of them even became theists or atheists
- that Erdogan lost many followers (I saw a lot of street interviews and other also asked some relatives in Turkey)
- he lost the support and trust of many people after the earthquake
- some hardcore followers and imams tried to spread propaganda in mosques and many people left the mosque during the speech and insulted them
- Erdogan fans also attacked a meeting of an opposing politician and threw rocks. They even beat up families and children
- Kilicdaroglu already warned the people because Erdogan is planning something. Kilicdaroglu said that no one should leave their house and celebrate outside if Erdogan loses

The real problem are the people who live in Europe. They don’t suffer under the consequences and still praise Erdogan
but I’m still optimistic
Erdogan will lose
After the last polls i am sure he will lose Kılıçdaroğlu is at 49% right now. If some Ince supporters give their support to Kılıçdaroğlu it can end in first tour. I am scared of the 2nd tour. Also there is a rumor that some deepfake videos of the Kılıçdaroğlu will come out this days be careful about that.
 
Last edited:
Prominent billionaires subscribe to this idea and throwing a lot of money into it

It's possible.

The Planet will be fine if this ideas is materialized.

Transhumanism: fine, it's kind of starting to be there, nothing against it, it just depends of which technology.
Extropianism: won't be there in our lifespan.
Singulitarniasim: AIs are "useful" but weren't even needed for the last thousands of years. I don't know what it's meant it that line, but intelligence means solving new problems. And I'm not that sure that they have solved any except winning against the world champion of the Go game...
Cosmism: I despise this idea. I don't even know where to start.
Rationalism: At this day in my life I'm not sure I have heard anyone saying "I'm against reason" or something like that.
Effective Altruism: It means empathy or something else and weird ?
Longtermism: Fine, but I'm not sure all of these things needed fancy words.

I mean, I'm very skeptical with that paragraph. I'm more into 19th century philosophy than contemporary American billionaires propagating their view of the world.

Throwing money into a tech will not necessarily bring it to us faster by the way. Sometimes it's just not there yet, or might even never be.


As a Turk i know Erdogan most likely will lose if he doesnt pull some tricks.
Him rigging the elections is not a thing because we are all very careful about it. Of course he will steal but not that much is my assumption.
My prediction is that he may try a coup. According to Soylu's talk but i doubt it. We will win this time.
How could he even pull a coup ? The military is with him now ? Or he has another way ?
 
Transhumanism: fine, it's kind of starting to be there, nothing against it, it just depends of which technology.
Extropianism: won't be there in our lifespan.
Singulitarniasim: AIs are "useful" but weren't even needed for the last thousands of years. I don't know what it's meant it that line, but intelligence means solving new problems. And I'm not that sure that they have solved any except winning against the world champion of the Go game...
Cosmism: I despise this idea. I don't even know where to start.
Rationalism: At this day in my life I'm not sure I have heard anyone saying "I'm against reason" or something like that.
Effective Altruism: It means empathy or something else and weird ?
Longtermism: Fine, but I'm not sure all of these things needed fancy words.

I mean, I'm very skeptical with that paragraph. I'm more into 19th century philosophy than contemporary American billionaires propagating their view of the world.

Throwing money into a tech will not necessarily bring it to us faster by the way. Sometimes it's just not there yet, or might even never be.




How could he even pull a coup ? The military is with him now ? Or he has another way ?
Military is with him but i doubt he can. I suggested as a possibility. Soylu is saying some wild things not to lose his position.
Erdogan will lose in the elections i am sure about that. He is desperately trying to go this election to the 2nd tour.
Post automatically merged:

Also Kılıçdaroglu says that those are behind Ince's fake montages are the Russians. Putin is helping Erdoğan for him to stay in power.
 
Ridiculous

Ah yes... of course, the PREVENT program in the UK is now stating that reading Tolkien, George Orwell and C.S. Lewis will lead to right-wing extremism... because of course it would.

Authors which have works which actually embody the resistance against tyranny... are now considered extreme. Mfw.
Post automatically merged:

Prominent billionaires subscribe to this idea and throwing a lot of money into it

It's possible.

The Planet will be fine if this ideas is materialized.
An infinite lifespan is the doom of humankind. The constant of the cycle of life and death has a very important role in the changing of guard, ideals and evolution of thought. Without a concern for mortality, we will stagnate.
 
Last edited:
An infinite lifespan is the doom of humankind. The constant of the cycle of life and death has a very important role in the changing of guard, ideals and evolution of thought. Without a concern for mortality, we will stagnate.
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯

Print this in the largest font the world's biggest printer can print and plaster the whole world with this quote
 
Change the terms, femminist dialogue sounds exactly like nazism

This is the original quote

and this is the same quote but with the words changed to talk about jews instead of white men


here's more examples

some chick from twitter


if replacing aryan with female and men with jews

sure does sound alot like a certain Austrian


here's one from reddit

and here's the nazi version, same dialogue and everything just jews instead of men


same is consistently found if you look at other sources, every femminist sounds like a nazi if you just change men for jew

here's a femminnist study as example



see how wrong it sounds if you change the terms but deliver the same exact message
 
Change the terms, femminist dialogue sounds exactly like nazism

This is the original quote

and this is the same quote but with the words changed to talk about jews instead of white men


here's more examples

some chick from twitter


if replacing aryan with female and men with jews

sure does sound alot like a certain Austrian


here's one from reddit

and here's the nazi version, same dialogue and everything just jews instead of men


same is consistently found if you look at other sources, every femminist sounds like a nazi if you just change men for jew

here's a femminnist study as example



see how wrong it sounds if you change the terms but deliver the same exact message
Yes, we know there are radical man-hating women-supremacist feminists.

There's a good amount of women hating men as well.


What do you suggest?
Delete all women AND all men from existence?
 

K!NG HARA$H!MA

Hustlerversity Graduate
I mean, I'm very skeptical with that paragraph. I'm more into 19th century philosophy than contemporary American billionaires propagating their view of the world.

Throwing money into a tech will not necessarily bring it to us faster by the way. Sometimes it's just not there yet, or might even never be.
American Billionaires views matters as they and other billionaires have the most political leverages and thus decide the future of humanity.

And Isn't 19th Century is just as fucked


Nietzsche argued he'd favour an aristocratic society where certain group of people should be treated differently based on capabilities over *Forced Equality* and showed an admiration for Indian concept of casteism

And the idea that some people are insufficient of intellect to *govern* themselves ie pro slavery and colonialism arguments and throw racial hygienists into that




An infinite lifespan is the doom of humankind. The constant of the cycle of life and death has a very important role in the changing of guard, ideals and evolution of thought. Without a concern for mortality, we will stagnate.
We're moving on from death as something that is inevitable and necessary to it's a concept that we can get rid of.

In theory, someone's death is not the end of his ideology and thoughts. it simply evolves and try to reconcile it to new and different eras. So in the metaphysics sense , the concept is there and now we're trying it to be more empirical.

Point is, change and evolution can happen without mortality
 
We're moving on from death as something that is inevitable and necessary to it's a concept that we can get rid of.
Not really.
This is just billionaires being delusional again.
They think they're all powerful and shit. Death is not going to be defeated 😂 Never



Nietzsche argued he'd favour an aristocratic society where certain group of people should be treated differently based on capabilities over *Forced Equality* and showed an admiration for Indian concept of casteism

And the idea that some people are insufficient of intellect to *govern* themselves ie pro slavery and colonialism arguments and throw racial hygienists into that
Nietzsche was an idiot for the most part. Don't take anything this guy said seriously 😂


change and evolution can happen without mortality
Nah
Try harder
 
What do you suggest?
Delete all women AND all men from existence?
If you would ban people for saying kill all blacks or jews then you should do the same to the people who say the same thing but white men are the targeted group instead whatever protected minority that the left likes
and ig social condemnation for those people too given how other hate groups are treated
 
American Billionaires views matters as they and other billionaires have the most political leverages and thus decide the future of humanity.
Indeed, but their ideas are driven by crazy things. "immortality" "space colonialism" "computers taking over humans":seriously:

And Isn't 19th Century is just as fucked
Indeed, but their philosophers are at least philosophers and not someone who got the richest in the world.

Obviously, everything in every philosophers isn't to be taken.

Nietzsche argued he'd favour an aristocratic society where certain group of people should be treated differently based on capabilities over *Forced Equality* and showed an admiration for Indian concept of casteism
Indeed, it can hardly be argued that he was for equality. His aristocratic society is nothing but a dream though. He deemed that only a few could rise at the top. He also argues that those at the top of the top shouldn't live in society nor should they seek political power because there is no hope for them (and power-greedy people are dumb).

I like his views in general.

And the idea that some people are insufficient of intellect to *govern* themselves ie pro slavery and colonialism arguments and throw racial hygienists into that
The idea that people can't govern themselves is still very much alive nowadays. Macron for instance says things like "the laws about immigration cannot be subject to a public debate because they can't understand its stakes". I'm not pro-Macron btw. But this isn't even pro-slavery or colonialism.
 
The idea that people can't govern themselves is still very much alive nowadays. [...] But this isn't even pro-slavery or colonialism.
It is tho

Indeed, but their ideas are driven by crazy things.
They can't imagine not being all powerful.
The world's richest people can do whatever they want for the most part, they don't really live as members of society. Not too different from the celestial dragons.
Believing that they should also be able to control death or venture to outer space is merely logical consequence for them (according to their own logic).
 
It can be used as a pro-slavery argument. But it's more of an anti-egalitarian idea than a pro-slavery idea.

They can't imagine not being all powerful.
The world's richest people can do whatever they want for the most part, they don't really live as members of society. Not too different from the celestial dragons.
Believing that they should also be able to control death or venture to outer space is merely logical consequence for them (according to their own logic).
As much as I wanna eat the rich. Let's specify that these are American billionaires
 
Top