Anime & Manga Ryofui Vs Riboku: How To Write Superb Manga Dialogue (And Why Luffy Vs Kaido Sucks)

Elder Lee Hung

Conqueror of the Stars
#1
Hello everyone,

So I’m sure this thread may fit into a better subforum, I’ll leave it to WorstGen’s mod team to figure that out. Today, I wanted to make one of the many threads that I’ve wanted to make for a long time now.

You see, I became quite infamous for a criticism of Wano that I had made about the arc having complete shit dialogue, a claim that I stand by vigorously. But what exactly does it mean for a manga to have shit dialogue?

A lot of manga dialogue simply involves characters stating what is already happening on panel to make sure that readers understand what is actually happening. But Wano’s dialogue was much more egregious than that. Wano gave us lines of dialogue like this:



Where Kaido states that he can tell Luffy is enjoying himself….because Luffy is smiling.



You see, there’s having characters clarify what is happening on panel so that the reader understands what events are happening and why…and then there’s having characters state the fucking meaning behind facial expressions.

I am willing to overlook Kaido having to state out loud which attacks actually injure him and which don’t, because One Piece’s art really isn’t good enough to communicate this information reliably without dialogue, but I draw the line when Kaido has to verbally state the meaning behind a fucking smile.

Is this really all Kaido and Luffy had to talk about? I mean this was their entire fucking fight. Luffy destroyed Kaido’s SMILE business, both he and Kaido want to become the Pirate King, both have their alleged connections to Joyboy, and their whole fight was “I’m going to drink now, but don’t worry I won’t nerf myself.” “Wororo, this brat is strong.” Wororo, he’s combining Haki types.”

This shit was straight up ass tier dialogue and today I’m going to finally explain why it bugs me so much. What I’m going to do is I’m going to present a scene that in my opinion has fucking stellar dialogue and explain what makes it so stellar.

I’m going to present a scene that I’ve talked about in detail in the past with fellow Kingdom enjoyers but with much more depth. There are some pretty big spoilers for the Kingdom manga here, so if you think Kingdom is a series you may want to read in the future and want to avoid spoilers, please proceed with caution.

This is Ryofui vs Riboku.



Now, a bit of context so that you can understand why this dialogue works so well. I’ll keep this brief, I promise.

Riboku, at the time this scene takes place, is considered the strongest General in all China, because he just defeated and killed the previous strongest General in all China. Ryofui is considered a great Politician, not the best in China but among the best and he has a powerful loyalist faction. With time to build his faction he could easily become the best in China. So!

Ryofui masterminds a situation that involves Riboku’s King forcing Riboku to go into enemy territory (Ryofui’s territory) to negotiate a hostage release. Ryofui, having planned for this, wants to achieve one of two goals now that he has Riboku in front of him:

1. Kill Riboku
OR
2. Obtain something from Riboku that is more valuable than Riboku’s head.

Riboku fully understands that this is Ryofui’s goal, so Riboku has two objectives of his own:

1. Do not get himself killed
2. Negotiate the hostage release while conceding as little to Ryofui as possible.

This is the core foundation of good dialogue: Good dialogue is a battle. Good dialogue involves two characters attacking and defending as they each verbally pound each other in order to achieve an objective. Look at all of the most famous dialogue scenes of all time, and I guarantee that you will see some variation of this principal in action. The resulting attacks and defenses are the foundation of the conflict in your dialogue. Sure good dialogue doesn’t have to involve conflict, but conflicting dialogue works best when you have two characters who are enemies as we have in this scene as well as Luffy vs Kaido.

But this scene is more brilliant than simply having good dialogue via Riboku and Ryofui attacking and defending. But just so I don’t lose your attention in a giant text wall, let’s just proceed with the scene and look at the dialogue:



Let’s look at Ryofui’s first real line of dialogue here:

“To think you would actually come, Prime Minister.”

This line of dialogue actually has a double meaning. On the surface, Ryofui is of course expressing his shock that Riboku actually came into enemy territory where he could be killed.

But in reality, what Ryofui is saying, is “Riboku, are you a fucking idiot?”

You see, Ryofui wants to kill Riboku, but he doesn’t just want to suddenly order his men to attack and kill Riboku and his escort. If Ryofui invited a foreign diplomat into his own state’s capital, and then simply gave the order to kill that diplomat…then no states would ever send diplomats to Ryofui or his state ever again.

In Kingdom, it is established that in spite of the fact that the seven states raise armies consisting of hundreds of thousands of men to slaughter each other in mass, the states still want to maintain diplomatic relationships with one another. This is because historically, there have been prior states that cut diplomatic ties with the other states, which resulted in those states ultimately being politically isolated and eventually destroyed entirely.

So what Ryofui wants is to kill Riboku, but he wants Riboku to give him a reason to kill him. He wants to say “Riboku, are you a fucking idiot?” To which Riboku responds “how dare you insult my honor, I’ll have your head for that!” And then Ryofui gives the order to kill Riboku and boom, Ryofui wins. The other states will see this as Riboku starting a fight that Ryofui finishes, and thus Ryofui’s state (Qin) will be able to maintain its diplomatic ties.

“We didn’t invite Riboku to Qin just to kill him, we wanted to negotiate with him, but as soon as he got to Kanyou, he tried to kill us and so we defended ourselves.”

This way, Qin can maintain an air of innocence. “We didn’t start this, Riboku’s death was his own fault.”

So how does Ryofui maintain his facade of innocence?

Easy: He projects a false sense of civility.

He doesn’t say: “Riboku, are you a fucking idiot?” He says: “To think you would actually come, Prime Minister.” The words are different, more civil, but the intended meaning is the same. “Give me a reason to kill you, Riboku.” Is what he is really going for here.

And thus, we have established the full context of why the dialogue I’m about to present to you is f*%#ing god tier. Ryofui wants to kill Riboku, so Ryofui attempts to make Riboku break civility and give the Qin a reason to kill him, but he attempts to do this indirectly so that Qin can maintain its facade of innocence.

But Riboku won’t take this lying down, as you will soon discover:



I want to draw your attention to Riboku’s final line of dialogue in these panels:

“I believe it’s only been a dozen years since you left Zhao. To have been made chancellor of the Great State of Qin in just ten years. Truly your talents are terrifying.”

You see, Riboku’s home state is the state of Zhao, a state that Ryofui used to live in before ultimately leaving to go to Qin. So when Riboku says the above line, what is he really saying?

“You, Chancellor Ryofui of Qin, are a fucking traitor to your state.”

And now we have truly reached the knife’s edge of why this dialogue is so brilliant. We are about to witness both Riboku and Ryofui verbally assault each other, but each of these characters is going to hide their verbal assaults under an illusion of paying respectful compliments to one another, since to break civility would signal defeat.

But Ryofui and Riboku aren’t just playing this game of political sparring for no reason:



Look at Shin’s reaction here.

What the heck is this ridiculous conversation?

You see, this level of verbal repertoire only works if you are dealing with extremely intelligent characters, which both Riboku and Ryofui are. Riboku is the greatest general in all of China, and Ryofui is at least one of the greatest politicians in China. These two can play this verbal sparring match because these are two hyper intelligent characters. You don’t usually see dialogue of this level between characters who aren’t highly intelligent or highly educated.

So to Shin, who is an ex-house servant turned battlefield commander with no formal education, this conversation makes no sense and is just weird. He is incapable of picking up on what these two characters are actually saying to each other, all he hears is the words without understanding their true meaning.

So when Riboku says: “To switch loyalties to make a name for yourself is a common occurrence in this times.” Secretly intending to say: “You are not an outstanding man like you think you are, you are just a run of the mill traitor,” this is completely lost on Shin, as is the rest of the following verbal onslaught:



Ryofui: “I’ve heard that you are extremely popular with the common folk.”

True meaning: “lol, you peasant”



True meaning: “Calling me a peasant is a compliment, I want nothing more than to live that sort of life.”



Ryofui: “I had thought that the man who killed Ouki would be if a far greater caliber.”

True meaning: “You seem to be a small, pathetic man.”

Riboku: “If I possessed your level of boldness, I would not have defeated Ouki. I only won because I am a coward.”

True meaning: “I am better than Ouki who was a proud fool. You are a proud fool just like Ouki, and thus I am better than you as well.”

The reason Ryofui busts out laughing here, is because he is impressed with how well Riboku has played his game of civility. He has attempted to make Riboku incriminate himself, but not only has Riboku not taken the bait, but he has punched Ryofui back in the same way Ryofui has punched him: by hiding his attacks under a facade of civility.

I will not play your game. I am better than you are.

Ryofui is thoroughly satisfied with this level of verbal combat, and he now understands that he won’t be able to best Riboku this way. So how does he respond?



He immediately shatters the false sense of civility that he himself has created and drops a verbal tactical nuke on Riboku.

“I’m going to kill you now, okay?”

But by this point, Ryofui knows better than to assume Riboku will take this lying down, so he does not give the order to have swords drawn just yet. Instead, Ryofui has dropped this verbal nuke on Riboku with the explicit purpose of now getting Riboku to “unleash his true power” as it were:



….

And if you want to know what happens next, well I’m afraid you’ll just have to join the GOAT fandom and read Kingdom. Again I must stress, this isn’t the only way to write good dialogue, but this is just to give an example of how to write fucking stellar dialogue in a manga. Literally each individual like of dialogue has its stated words, it’s true secret meaning, and it’s attempt to ‘defeat’ the opponent.

Now that we’ve analyzed dialogue that is literally dripping with illusions, hidden meanings, hidden objectives, and subtle verbal combat, I want to turn your attention back to the original piece of dialogue I opened this thread with.



There is no subtlety behind this line of dialogue, or really any line of dialogue present in Luffy vs Kaido. There are no secret intended meanings, no lines of attack or defense aside from these two simply screaming the very first thoughts that come to their minds with no restraint. There is no substance whatsoever to the dialogue in Luffy vs Kaido or most dialogue in Wano.

If Ryofui vs Riboku was a verbal sword dual between two masters, each of them gracefully parrying, thrusting, evading, and stabbing with precision and intent…Luffy vs Kaido is two angry brain-damaged gorillas swinging shit hammers at each other while howling at the top of their lungs in the process.

There is no elegance or mastery to this dialogue, or the vast majority of lines of dialogue in Wano.

Which is why I can now definitively state that Wano has shit dialogue.

@Owl Ki @Blackbeard @Den_Den_Mushi @TheKnightOfTheSea @God Buggy @Xione @MarineHQ @ZenZu @HA001 OF THE RAIN @Light D Lamperouge @The White Crane @Wuuuke @FutureWarrior123 @Jiihad @AkainuTheGrimReaper @silverfire @scoobie3 @Extravlad @kurwa @ConquistadoR @JoNdule @ShishioIsBack @Sentinel @Playa4321 @Apollo @Seth etc etc etc
 
Last edited:
#2
I don't think any series in general is touching Kingdom's dialogue, whether it be Berserk/Vagabond/etc etc any series out there. Hara has his political dialogues down and the delivery methods. In particular, along with panel arrangements. For One Piece, the best interactions so far have been with the Gorosei, Fujitora, Sakazuki, RA, few other marines.

Even the recent chapter is a masterclass of how to write a top tier dialogue conversation with proper panel camera arrangements of the characters, reactions, and scenes. Or even just go back to RiShi & Shoubunkun, Ei Sei & Qi King, SHK & Riboku, Ouki & Ei Sei, Tou & Moubu, etc etc.

Big Mom & Kaido's interaction for example was better presented compared to Kaido vs Luffy, so it's not as if Oda can't do it. But he's just selective on the characters, hence dudes like Gorosei/Saka/Issho/RA/other marines are my fav, due to their interactions and dialogue presentations being the best. Even then none of em are touching the dialogue interaction in Kingdom when it peaks.

Good work bringing this up, not something I've thought about but yea man, Hara is the GOAT mangaka in this. That mf next level man, it's different genres so not really fair I guess, but man no mangaka is touching Hara from a technical standpoint of writing with the combination of actual comic presentation (the art/camera angles/panel arrangements/etc).
 
Last edited:
#3
I don't know much about Kingdom but from the first 2 paragraphs there's already a problem:
You're claiming that it's bad for Kaidou to say Luffy is enjoying him self but then show a panel of 2 characters saying each other's full names as if the readers somehow forgot who they are.
Which is problematic to say the least.
I don't believe Kingdom is bad, though I don't know if I'll ever read/watch it, but come on lol.
Also, Luffy vs Kaidou wasn't just a battle of mere ideals and morals, it was a major stepping stone for Luffy to prove if he's truly worthy, in terms of strength, to become a Yonko member and compete with the top dogs for the role as Pirate King.
 
#4
One Piece post-timeskip dialogue is pure ass man. Like two stroke-afflicted orangutans slinging shit and mouldy bananas. Some absolute fucking bangers include “not everyone dies because they want to” from Latakuri, 30 chapters of “WEEEEDING CAAAKEE” from Fat Meme, and “WHERE ARE YOU GOING KUMA” directed to a non-sentient cyborg who lacks even the capacity to respond. Oda has basically no concept of ‘show, don’t tell’ and can’t conceptualise dialogue between characters with an IQ above 80.
 

Seth

𝐊𝐨𝐤𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐢
#7
Hello everyone,

So I’m sure this thread may fit into a better subforum, I’ll leave it to WorstGen’s mod team to figure that out. Today, I wanted to make one of the many threads that I’ve wanted to make for a long time now.

You see, I became quite infamous for a criticism of Wano that I had made about the arc having complete shit dialogue, a claim that I stand by vigorously. But what exactly does it mean for a manga to have shit dialogue?

A lot of manga dialogue simply involves characters stating what is already happening on panel to make sure that readers understand what is actually happening. But Wano’s dialogue was much more egregious than that. Wano gave us lines of dialogue like this:



Where Kaido states that he can tell Luffy is enjoying himself….because Luffy is smiling.



You see, there’s having characters clarify what is happening on panel so that the reader understands what events are happening and why…and then there’s having characters state the fucking meaning behind facial expressions.

I am willing to overlook Kaido having to state out loud which attacks actually injure him and which don’t, because One Piece’s art really isn’t good enough to communicate this information reliably without dialogue, but I draw the line when Kaido has to verbally state the meaning behind a fucking smile.

Is this really all Kaido and Luffy had to talk about? I mean this was their entire fucking fight. Luffy destroyed Kaido’s SMILE business, both he and Kaido want to become the Pirate King, both have their alleged connections to Joyboy, and their whole fight was “I’m going to drink now, but don’t worry I won’t nerf myself.” “Wororo, this brat is strong.” Wororo, he’s combining Haki types.”

This shit was straight up ass tier dialogue and today I’m going to finally explain why it bugs me so much. What I’m going to do is I’m going to present a scene that in my opinion has fucking stellar dialogue and explain what makes it so stellar.

I’m going to present a scene that I’ve talked about in detail in the past with fellow Kingdom enjoyers but with much more depth. There are some pretty big spoilers for the Kingdom manga here, so if you think Kingdom is a series you may want to read in the future and want to avoid spoilers, please proceed with caution.

This is Ryofui vs Riboku.



Now, a bit of context so that you can understand why this dialogue works so well. I’ll keep this brief, I promise.

Riboku, at the time this scene takes place, is considered the strongest General in all China, because he just defeated and killed the previous strongest General in all China. Ryofui is considered a great Politician, not the best in China but among the best and he has a powerful loyalist faction. With time to build his faction he could easily become the best in China. So!

Ryofui masterminds a situation that involves Riboku’s King forcing Riboku to go into enemy territory (Ryofui’s territory) to negotiate a hostage release. Ryofui, having planned for this, wants to achieve one of two goals now that he has Riboku in front of him:

1. Kill Riboku
OR
2. Obtain something from Riboku that is more valuable than Riboku’s head.

Riboku fully understands that this is Ryofui’s goal, so Riboku has two objectives of his own:

1. Do not get himself killed
2. Negotiate the hostage release while conceding as little to Ryofui as possible.

This is the core foundation of good dialogue: Good dialogue is a battle. Good dialogue involves two characters attacking and defending as they each verbally pound each other in order to achieve an objective. Look at all of the most famous dialogue scenes of all time, and I guarantee that you will see some variation of this principal in action. The resulting attacks and defenses are the foundation of the conflict in your dialogue. Sure good dialogue doesn’t have to involve conflict, but conflicting dialogue works best when you have two characters who are enemies as we have in this scene as well as Luffy vs Kaido.

But this scene is more brilliant than simply having good dialogue via Riboku and Ryofui attacking and defending. But just so I don’t lose your attention in a giant text wall, let’s just proceed with the scene and look at the dialogue:



Let’s look at Ryofui’s first real line of dialogue here:

“To think you would actually come, Prime Minister.”

This line of dialogue actually has a double meaning. On the surface, Ryofui is of course expressing his shock that Riboku actually came into enemy territory where he could be killed.

But in reality, what Ryofui is saying, is “Riboku, are you a fucking idiot?”

You see, Ryofui wants to kill Riboku, but he doesn’t just want to suddenly order his men to attack and kill Riboku and his escort. If Ryofui invited a foreign diplomat into his own state’s capital, and then simply gave the order to kill that diplomat…then no states would ever send diplomats to Ryofui or his state ever again.

In Kingdom, it is established that in spite of the fact that the seven states raise armies consisting of hundreds of thousands of men to slaughter each other in mass, the states still want to maintain diplomatic relationships with one another. This is because historically, there have been prior states that cut diplomatic ties with the other states, which resulted in those states ultimately being politically isolated and eventually destroyed entirely.

So what Ryofui wants is to kill Riboku, but he wants Riboku to give him a reason to kill him. He wants to say “Riboku, are you a fucking idiot?” To which Riboku responds “how dare you insult my honor, I’ll have your head for that!” And then Ryofui gives the order to kill Riboku and boom, Ryofui wins. The other states will see this as Riboku starting a fight that Ryofui finishes, and thus Ryofui’s state (Qin) will be able to maintain its diplomatic ties.

“We didn’t invite Riboku to Qin just to kill him, we wanted to negotiate with him, but as soon as he got to Kanyou, he tried to kill us and so we defended ourselves.”

This way, Qin can maintain an air of innocence. “We didn’t start this, Riboku’s death was his own fault.”

So how does Ryofui maintain his facade of innocence?

Easy: He projects a false sense of civility.

He doesn’t say: “Riboku, are you a fucking idiot?” He says: “To think you would actually come, Prime Minister.” The words are different, more civil, but the intended meaning is the same. “Give me a reason to kill you, Riboku.” Is what he is really going for here.

And thus, we have established the full context of why the dialogue I’m about to present to you is f*%#ing god tier. Ryofui wants to kill Riboku, so Ryofui attempts to make Riboku break civility and give the Qin a reason to kill him, but he attempts to do this indirectly so that Qin can maintain its facade of innocence.

But Riboku won’t take this lying down, as you will soon discover:



I want to draw your attention to Riboku’s final line of dialogue in these panels:

“I believe it’s only been a dozen years since you left Zhao. To have been made chancellor of the Great State of Qin in just ten years. Truly your talents are terrifying.”

You see, Riboku’s home state is the state of Zhao, a state that Ryofui used to live in before ultimately leaving to go to Qin. So when Riboku says the above line, what is he really saying?

“You, Chancellor Ryofui of Qin, are a fucking traitor to your state.”

And now we have truly reached the knife’s edge of why this dialogue is so brilliant. We are about to witness both Riboku and Ryofui verbally assault each other, but each of these characters is going to hide their verbal assaults under an illusion of paying respectful compliments to one another, since to break civility would signal defeat.

But Ryofui and Riboku aren’t just playing this game of political sparring for no reason:



Look at Shin’s reaction here.

What the heck is this ridiculous conversation?

You see, this level of verbal repertoire only works if you are dealing with extremely intelligent characters, which both Riboku and Ryofui are. Riboku is the greatest general in all of China, and Ryofui is at least one of the greatest politicians in China. These two can play this verbal sparring match because these are two hyper intelligent characters. You don’t usually see dialogue of this level between characters who aren’t highly intelligent or highly educated.

So to Shin, who is an ex-house servant turned battlefield commander with no formal education, this conversation makes no sense and is just weird. He is incapable of picking up on what these two characters are actually saying to each other, all he hears is the words without understanding their true meaning.

So when Riboku says: “To switch loyalties to make a name for yourself is a common occurrence in this times.” Secretly intending to say: “You are not an outstanding man like you think you are, you are just a run of the mill traitor,” this is completely lost on Shin, as is the rest of the following verbal onslaught:



Ryofui: “I’ve heard that you are extremely popular with the common folk.”

True meaning: “lol, you peasant”



True meaning: “Calling me a peasant is a compliment, I want nothing more than to live that sort of life.”



Ryofui: “I had thought that the man who killed Ouki would be if a far greater caliber.”

True meaning: “You seem to be a small, pathetic man.”

Riboku: “If I possessed your level of boldness, I would not have defeated Ouki. I only won because I am a coward.”

True meaning: “I am better than Ouki who was a proud fool. You are a proud fool just like Ouki, and thus I am better than you as well.”

The reason Ryofui busts out laughing here, is because he is impressed with how well Riboku has played his game of civility. He has attempted to make Riboku incriminate himself, but not only has Riboku not taken the bait, but he has punched Ryofui back in the same way Ryofui has punched him: by hiding his attacks under a facade of civility.

I will not play your game. I am better than you are.

Ryofui is thoroughly satisfied with this level of verbal combat, and he now understands that he won’t be able to best Riboku this way. So how does he respond?



He immediately shatters the false sense of civility that he himself has created and drops a verbal tactical nuke on Riboku.

“I’m going to kill you now, okay?”

But by this point, Ryofui knows better than to assume Riboku will take this lying down, so he does not give the order to have swords drawn just yet. Instead, Ryofui has dropped this verbal nuke on Riboku with the explicit purpose of now getting Riboku to “unleash his true power” as it were:



….

And if you want to know what happens next, well I’m afraid you’ll just have to join the GOAT fandom and read Kingdom. Again I must stress, this isn’t the only way to write good dialogue, but this is just to give an example of how to write fucking stellar dialogue in a manga. Literally each individual like of dialogue has its stated words, it’s true secret meaning, and it’s attempt to ‘defeat’ the opponent.

Now that we’ve analyzed dialogue that is literally dripping with illusions, hidden meanings, hidden objectives, and subtle verbal combat, I want to turn your attention back to the original piece of dialogue I opened this thread with.



There is no subtlety behind this line of dialogue, or really any line of dialogue present in Luffy vs Kaido. There are no secret intended meanings, no lines of attack or defense aside from these two simply screaming the very first thoughts that come to their minds with no restraint. There is no substance whatsoever to the dialogue in Luffy vs Kaido or most dialogue in Wano.

If Ryofui vs Riboku was a verbal sword dual between two masters, each of them gracefully parrying, thrusting, evading, and stabbing with precision and intent…Luffy vs Kaido is two angry brain-damaged gorillas swinging shit hammers at each other while howling at the top of their lungs in the process.

There is no elegance or mastery to this dialogue, or the vast majority of lines of dialogue in Wano.

Which is why I can now definitively state that Wano has shit dialogue.

@Owl Ki @Blackbeard @Den_Den_Mushi @TheKnightOfTheSea @God Buggy @Xione @MarineHQ @ZenZu @HA001 OF THE RAIN @Light D Lamperouge @The White Crane @Wuuuke @FutureWarrior123 @Jiihad @AkainuTheGrimReaper @silverfire @scoobie3 @Extravlad @kurwa @ConquistadoR @JoNdule @ShishioIsBack @Sentinel @Playa4321 @Apollo @Seth etc etc etc
One Piece literally can't fucking stand up to Kingdom in anything other than Oda portraying women as a whores and plushie selling bitches.


Shin goes thru more development during the first arc than Luffy does for 1000 chapters.
 
#8
One Piece literally can't fucking stand up to Kingdom in anything other than Oda portraying women as a whores and plushie selling bitches.
Big Mom
Ulti
Vivi
Tsuru
Need I go on?
Y'all are turning into lee33 nitpicking scenes that aren't even meant to be that deep.
I havn't seen any of you actually pull up any deep scenes and try to criticise those. You pick purposefully shallow ones and say "See? I told you OP has bad writing!"
And the fact people unironically say Kingdom is better in terms of writing is fucking hilarious man.
Post automatically merged:

And somehow, the scene with Kaidou is more deep than the Kingdom panels you posted, as they show that Luffy's will is so strong that he can find enjoyment in even the most dangerous scenarios.
 

Seth

𝐊𝐨𝐤𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐢
#9
Big Mom
Ulti
Vivi
Tsuru
Need I go on?
Y'all are turning into lee33 nitpicking scenes that aren't even meant to be that deep.
I havn't seen any of you actually pull up any deep scenes and try to criticise those. You pick purposefully shallow ones and say "See? I told you OP has bad writing!"
And the fact people unironically say Kingdom is better in terms of writing is fucking hilarious man.
Post automatically merged:

And somehow, the scene with Kaidou is more deep than the Kingdom panels you posted, as they show that Luffy's will is so strong that he can find enjoyment in even the most dangerous adventures.
:milaugh:

Blud listed Big Mom and expects a serious conversation. Nah blud. You better leave. Kingdom fans won't have this shit.


Kingdom crushes OP in every aspect.
 

Seth

𝐊𝐨𝐤𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐢
#11
As I expected, you're pussyfooting around the fact that you're wrong, and resulting to mockery.
You deserve nothing else than that.

You attempt to defend trash piece and start by listing Big Mom as a counterargument to me mocking the use of women in the show.

C'mon. Wake the fuck up bro.

:milaugh:
 

Seth

𝐊𝐨𝐤𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐢
#14
You said they're whores and merch fuel.
I mentioned Big Mom, who's the opposite of that.
Among others.
Oh, well. That would be correct ngl. Big Mom is so ugly and disgusting she pushes fans away. There was potential for an amazing powerful woman ( powerful in both strength and resolve ).

But the rest? Even tho I like Vivi she is so overrated and typically boring peace and love everyone preacher.

Ulti has no use aside from her boobs. Tsuru is another washed old hag who only talks to Sengoku and has some lesbo class no one cares about. She really brought nothing to the series.

I missed that until you quoted this part:milaugh::milaugh::milaugh::milaugh::milaugh:
 

Seth

𝐊𝐨𝐤𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐢
#17
It's kind of hilarious how they bash Kaidou for saying the obvious then immediately post a panel of characters saying the obvious.
I don't know if Kingdom is good or not but I know it's fans are terrible at defending it.
Kingdom defends itself.

Blud you said you don't know if Kingdom is good which means you don't know the setup and narration led to scenes.


How the fuck are you even discussing the topic then?

Trust me when I tell you. The dialogue shits on OP dialogue, you just need to know it all and read it.
 
#18
Kingdom defends itself.

Blud you said you don't know if Kingdom is good which means you don't know the setup and narration led to scenes.


How the fuck are you even discussing the topic then?

Trust me when I tell you. The dialogue shits on OP dialogue, you just need to know it all and read it.
I don't need to know it all. They're literally spoonfeeding the names of the characters to the readers as if the readers don't know their fucking names lol.
I fail to see how that's good dialogue, let alone dialogue that is above OP's.
And again, I don't care about Kingdom, but this is particularly sad because I always see the same gang of people ( mostly Admiral wankers, which is weird ) in a circlejerk overreacting about nothing.
It's like nobody has anything better to do, so they just bash random mangas for no reason and nitpick the smallest things.
 

Seth

𝐊𝐨𝐤𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐢
#19
I don't need to know it all. They're literally spoonfeeding the names of the characters to the readers as if the readers don't know their fucking names lol.
I fail to see how that's good dialogue, let alone dialogue that is above OP's.
And again, I don't care about Kingdom, but this is particularly sad because I always see the same gang of people ( mostly Admiral wankers, which is weird ) in a circlejerk overreacting about nothing.
It's like nobody has anything better to do, so they just bash random mangas for no reason and nitpick the smallest things.
You are not worth the discussion on this topic. You didn't read Kingdom once and you are arguing if One Piece panel is better than Kingdom's.

Such an L bro.
 
Top