Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
"JK Rowling is a terrible person and if you give her royalties you are in fact a bigot and transphobe". Is that not an agenda?
Literally yes, you are on Twitter
Literally yes, you are on Twitter
No, like I said, I don't think it makes you a fascist. Like I said, its a complicated subject and this vision is debatable.
The logic is just:
If you KNOW what a person does and you KNOW that giving them money will help them hurt others THEN you are most probably OKAY with what they stand for.
Personally, I give a pass for things like game or books as those are frankly too indirect, but the logic is pretty solid.
That's why I prefered to warned FIRST by giving a context. If you go to the first post (the post that started this thread's whole career) you will see that I do not treat people who will buy the game of transphobe and say in fact that this is ok to get it as this is probably a cool game.
The logic is just:
If you KNOW what a person does and you KNOW that giving them money will help them hurt others THEN you are most probably OKAY with what they stand for.
Personally, I give a pass for things like game or books as those are frankly too indirect, but the logic is pretty solid.
That's why I prefered to warned FIRST by giving a context. If you go to the first post (the post that started this thread's whole career) you will see that I do not treat people who will buy the game of transphobe and say in fact that this is ok to get it as this is probably a cool game.
Are you selectively picking information to shape your views?
I said regimes, whether Islamic or non Islamic, tend to wage wars on others for various reasons. Sometimes in the name of Queen, in the name of resource capture, due to past differences, or... just to capture more land.
The problem starts when you separare Islamic endeavors from non-Islamic ones.
Now you can keep twisting it to fit your narrative and say, no no Islam is bad, Islam is violant, Islam spreads hate, Islam is fascist, and so on. But at the same time, you are ignoring the fact that other regimes have been doing the same.
How does it differ if the end result is the same? Especially when non-Islamic regimes are currently ruling the world, waging wars everywhere, dropping atomic bombs, and more.
Lmao, I dont know how dense people can be.
I said regimes, whether Islamic or non Islamic, tend to wage wars on others for various reasons. Sometimes in the name of Queen, in the name of resource capture, due to past differences, or... just to capture more land.
The problem starts when you separare Islamic endeavors from non-Islamic ones.
Now you can keep twisting it to fit your narrative and say, no no Islam is bad, Islam is violant, Islam spreads hate, Islam is fascist, and so on. But at the same time, you are ignoring the fact that other regimes have been doing the same.
How does it differ if the end result is the same? Especially when non-Islamic regimes are currently ruling the world, waging wars everywhere, dropping atomic bombs, and more.
Lmao, I dont know how dense people can be.
No, like I said, I don't think it makes you a fascist. Like I said, its a complicated subject and this vision is debatable.
The logic is just:
If you KNOW what a person does and you KNOW that giving them money will help them hurt others THEN you are most probably OKAY with what they stand for.
Personally, I give a pass for things like game or books as those are frankly too indirect, but the logic is pretty solid.
That's why I prefered to warned FIRST by giving a context. If you go to the first post (the post that started this thread's whole career) you will see that I do not treat people who will buy the game of transphobe and say in fact that this is ok to get it as this is probably a cool game.
The logic is just:
If you KNOW what a person does and you KNOW that giving them money will help them hurt others THEN you are most probably OKAY with what they stand for.
Personally, I give a pass for things like game or books as those are frankly too indirect, but the logic is pretty solid.
That's why I prefered to warned FIRST by giving a context. If you go to the first post (the post that started this thread's whole career) you will see that I do not treat people who will buy the game of transphobe and say in fact that this is ok to get it as this is probably a cool game.
Where's the source that she's using her royalty checks to fund anti-trans programs or camps (whatever it is) keep hearing people use this argument but no source.
And assuming one is okay with what someone stands for simply because they bought a product is a huge reach. The clothes we wear for example were likely made in a sweatshop involving child labor. Does that mean I'm now okay with child labor because I need to wear clothes? 🤔
You can't play the morality card like this.
And assuming one is okay with what someone stands for simply because they bought a product is a huge reach. The clothes we wear for example were likely made in a sweatshop involving child labor. Does that mean I'm now okay with child labor because I need to wear clothes? 🤔
You can't play the morality card like this.
Last edited:
