Controversial General Political Discussion

[notAfanboy]

Sure, external factors can lead to homosexuality. Doesnt change homosexuality still ocurring naturally in humans and other non-human animals

You are adamant about using animals to justify human actions.

Animals are involved in:

Necrophilia : https://www.sciencealert.com/10-delightful-animals-you-may-not-have-known-were-necrophiliacs

Eating poop - Coprophagia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophagia

Cannibalism: https://www.discoverwildlife.com/animal-facts/cannibal-animals-creatures-that-eat-their-own-kind/

So, using animals as an example is straight up stupid and retarded.

Find a better justification.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Interesting takes. But I would say animal behaviour can't be used to justify human behaviour.
10 animals that are cannibals:
https://a-z-animals.com/blog/discover-animals-that-are-cannibals/

So, if someone decides to eat a human, will you say animals also do this? Get over it?

comparing homosexuality to cannibalism

 

[Zenos7]

Many of you are quite religious so it's clear you believe God exist.


So, do you guys also believe ghosts exist? Or is it that only God exist but ghosts can't?

Or gods of other religions. . . .

Post automatically merged: Aug 24, 2023

You are adamant about using animals to justify human actions.

Im doing no such thing lol.

Saying it is natural is not justifying the behaviour, like, at all.

Natural =/= good.

There is a reason there is a logical fallacy called appeal to nature lmao

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Many of you are quite religious so it's clear you believe God exist.


So, do you guys also believe ghosts exist? Or is it that only God exist but ghosts can't?

how many gods?

 

[Logiko]

Natural =/= good or with purpose or other shit anyone wants to force on it.

Natural = NEUTRAL

So i was asking for a definition of man and woman based on gender that is not circular and useless.

What do you mean by "definition that is not circular and useless". The definition of gender I gave you is perfect. It's not circular nor uselss.

Concerning homosexuality you have to ask yourself :

Does it create harm in any way to anyone or the specie ? If no, then there is no reason to question this sexuality. And spoiler it does not so you can now sleep well :)

 

[Zenos7]

So, using animals as an example is straight up stupid and retarded

No its not. Unless of course you have no idea what natural means

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

You have two guns;

1) Real gun with a metal bullet
2) Gun but with plastic bullet

You want to shoot a target. You ask your friend with real gun to shoot at the same time as you shoot a plastic bullet.

It will give you the feel that you actually shot and hit the target, but it is your friend who did that. Not your water gun.
You fulfilled your instinctive desire to shoot and you got the desired end result.

But, why you must use a gun with plastic bullet?
For what purpose? To feel happy?

what is this analogy?🤣🤣

 

[Zenos7]

Natural = NEUTRAL

What do you mean by "definition that is not circular and useless". The definition of gender I gave you is perfect. It's not circular nor uselss.

Concerning homosexuality you have to ask yourself :

Does it create harm in any way to anyone or the specie ? If no, then there is no reason to question this sexuality. And spoiler it does not so you can now sleep well :)

Bro. Im not fucking asking for a definition of gender. Now reread my post and get what im actually asking

 

[notAfanboy]

comparing homosexuality to cannibalism

Let me rephrase what you said:

Comparing animal behaviour to human behaviour

Or just cherry-picking one thing because it can be used as proof.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

It only took how long? One week? to return to the gender topic

 

[Zenos7]

comparing homosexuality to cannibalism

Well, cannibalism is very natural as well.

 

[Logiko]

Bro. Im not fucking asking for a definition of gender. Now reread my post and get what im actually asking

The problem is that your sentence is a non sence, if you want a definition of "man" and "woman" then you are asking for a definition of GENDER.

It only took how long? One week? to return to the gender topic

I just let one afternoon pass, I was watching a stream today.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Well, cannibalism is very natural as well.

Yes it is. Most humans did it in the.past.

 

[Toby D. Dog]

If it’s two adults and there is consent, then we shouldn’t judge.

 

[notAfanboy]

No its not. Unless of course you have no idea what natural means

Why? Animals do all of that, why are you picking just homosexuality? Your reasoning?

What is natural in terms of "using sex organs"? Please explain.

From my understanding, using sex organs for their intended purpose is natural (i.e., reproduction).

 

[Logiko]

If it’s two adults and there is consent, then we shouldn’t judge.

Exactly

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

If it’s two adults and there is consent, then we shouldn’t judge.

Does this apply to voluntary cannibalism too?

 

[NAMELESS]

"existing in or formed by nature (opposed to artificial)"

From dictionary.com

I think you guys are mistaking this shit

Post automatically merged: Aug 24, 2023

Healthy =/= natural?!

Holy shit indeed

healthy=natural=otherwise no life.
Nature means what is intrinsic to a being or thing.The concept of nature here regards the inherent qualities of being.

 

[notAfanboy]

Natural = NEUTRAL

What do you mean by "definition that is not circular and useless". The definition of gender I gave you is perfect. It's not circular nor uselss.

Concerning homosexuality you have to ask yourself :

Does it create harm in any way to anyone or the specie ? If no, then there is no reason to question this sexuality. And spoiler it does not so you can now sleep well :)

Nature is not neutral. Nature is in pairs. Not that hard to find. Watch National Geographic.

 

[Toby D. Dog]

Does this apply to voluntary cannibalism too?

That involves death, so no.