Controversial General Political Discussion

[Bisoromi Bear]

natural
adjective
1. existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind
Example: carrots contain a natural antiseptic
2. in accordance with the nature of, or circumstances surrounding, someone or something
Example: sharks have no natural enemies
3. (of a parent or child) related by blood
Example: such adopted children always knew who their natural parents were
4. (of a note) not sharp or flat
Example: the bassoon plays G natural instead of A flat
5. relating to earthly human or physical nature as distinct from the spiritual or supernatural realm.
6. (of a bid) straightforwardly reflecting one's holding of cards
Example: his bid of one heart was natural and positive
noun
1. a person having an innate talent for a particular task or activity
Example: she was a natural for television work
2. a sign (♮) denoting a natural note when a previous sign or the key signature would otherwise demand a sharp or a flat.
3. an off-white colour
Example: colour for the summer is defined by the trend towards naturals
4. (in a gambling game) a combination or score that immediately wins.
5. an insect or other small creature used as bait, rather than an artificial imitation.
6. a person with an intellectual disability.
adverb
1. naturally
Example: keep walking—just act natural

❤️‍🔥🥕🐇

 

[notAfanboy]

L

Tell this to SCIENCE. BIOLOGY. RESEARCHERS. NATURE.

Not me.

 

[Logiko]

Yes, it is when it comes to reproduction.

Or what else? Go on say it.

Without reproduction, there is no evolution.

Asexual species, for the most part, are relatively short-lived offshoots of sexual ancestors.

*Short-lived*, means asexual reproducers don't survive for long.
Here is the research paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dvg.1020150303

You must know that nature is not only about life, right ?

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Tell this to SCIENCE. BIOLOGY. RESEARCHERS. NATURE.

Not me.

L

 

[Zenos7]

No, you said animals do this get over it.

I am talking about that, if you remember. Or I can find and quote it.

Yes, plenty animals do it. That doesnt have anything to with justifying or supporting that behavior in humans. Thats you strawmanning and lowkey forcing an appeal to nature on my part, but thats not what im doing. I even mentioned appeal to nature in my posts before and how that is a fallacy.

Natural =/= good or healthy or moral or whatever nonsense thats not linked to being natural you want to slide into the convo when the convo is just about it being natural or not.

I get that you are losing sleep over strangers being homosexuals, but i dont care about your moral judgement nor am i sharing one myself

 

[notAfanboy]

You must know that nature is not only about life, right ?

Stick to the topic, mate.

 

[Zenos7]

The first thing that came to my mind. But I thought I would leave it out since it will get personal.

But yeah, answer the damn question bruh

^

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Stick to the topic, mate.

The topic is politics.🤣🤣🤣the whole convo is off topic

 

[Zenos7]

that definition is shallow and people already pointed out why it can't be use to measure us

I never argued in can be used to measure us wtf.?!

Stop reading what you wanna read, read what im actually saying (especially the dictionary definition i shared)

 

[NAMELESS]

Yes, plenty animals do it. That doesnt have anything to with justifying or supporting that behavior in humans. Thats you strawmanning and lowkey forcing an appeal to nature on my part, but thats not what im doing. I even mentioned appeal to nature in my posts before and how that is a fallacy.

Natural =/= good or healthy or moral or whatever nonsense thats not linked to being natural you want to slide into the convo when the convo is just about it being natural or not.

I get that you are losing sleep over strangers being homosexuals, but i dont care about your moral judgement nor am i sharing one myself

who made moral judgments here?People are merely questioning using animals as parameters.Going by your logic,yeahh,homosexuality is a natural occurrence in many species,but is it for humans?That is the big question!

 

[Zenos7]

Good boy.
Now tell me, are humans, sexual producers or asexual producers?

What does this have to do with anything?

 

[NAMELESS]

L

got triggered for being asexual yay?

Post automatically merged: Aug 24, 2023

What does this have to do with anything?

its a small logical game he is playing.play it too.

 

[Zenos7]

who made moral judgments here?People are merely questioning using animals as parameters.Going by your logic,yeahh,homosexuality is a natural occurrence in many species,but is it for humans?That is the big question!

It is natural in humans. Gays dont need to be bioengineered to be gay lmfao

 

[notAfanboy]

Yes, plenty animals do it. That doesnt have anything to with justifying or supporting that behavior in humans. Thats you strawmanning and lowkey forcing an appeal to nature on my part, but thats not what im doing. I even mentioned appeal to nature in my posts before and how that is a fallacy.

Natural =/= good or healthy or moral or whatever nonsense thats not linked to being natural you want to slide into the convo when the convo is just about it being natural or not.

I get that you are losing sleep over strangers being homosexuals, but i dont care about your moral judgement nor am i sharing one myself

Lmao, you were getting mad over it and saying "get over it" when I said the natural purpose of sex organs is reproduction.

 

[Zenos7]

who made moral judgments here?People are merely questioning using animals as parameters.Going by your logic,yeahh,homosexuality is a natural occurrence in many species,but is it for humans?That is the big question!

Im not using them as parameters for hulan behavior. Natural isnt just about humans.

Yall dont get what natural means and apparently are way too arrogant and self-centered about being human.

 

[NAMELESS]

It is natural in humans. Gays dont need to be bioengineered to be gay lmfao

They dont,but hormonal problems are lnow to change one sexual orientation,so does psychological trauma and some people are gay since childhood without physiological or mental problems.

 

[Logiko]

And as i predicted, this is circular af. Because gender in society isnt stagnant. This definition is ultimately meaningless, as are all that i have been given that are based on gender instead of sex

Well, technically, I think gender identities should disappear with time (we are talking about hundreds of years). Definition of men and women based on sex are just wrong. Scientifically wrong.

Stick to the topic, mate.

Mate. Your argument is that nature is binary. By mentionning the presence of things outside of life in the spectrum of "nature in the universe" I prove to you that your argument is just a baseless freudian wet conceptual dream trying to put symbolism on something that is neutral and has no intent.

The topic is politics.🤣🤣🤣the whole convo is off topic

Actually no, the way we see identities in society is a very political subject.

 

[Zenos7]

a small logical game he is playing.play it too.

What both of you are doing is far off from logic though, so im having my doubts here

 

[NAMELESS]

Lmao, you were getting mad over it and saying "get over it" when I said the natural purpose of sex organs is reproduction.

Reproduction and FUN in case of primates.Some monkeys spend the entire day masturbating and fucking each other basically.

 

[Zenos7]

They dont,but hormonal problems are now to change one sexual orientation,so does psychological trauma and some people are gay since childhood without physiological or mental problems.

It being natural doesnt mean it cant occur due to external factors. The same is true the other way around. Get over it