No. Men/women are defined as adult human male/female.
Yes and this is wrong. scientifically because it confuses sex and gender. But that's not surprising, usually academic books of that type are quite slow to catch up with reality, we have this problem in France.

A hypothetical planet composed of antimatter.

This? Hypothetical?
Yes. Hypothetical. Just to show you that planet don't come in pairs. You are trying to put symbolism on nature, its completely unscientific.


I disagree because homosexuality is not the standard.its is deviant(no moral judgment).There must be factors we are unaware at play for those that are homosexuals since childhood without the factors i pointed out.Also,loneliness and the impossibility of heterosexual relations is also one the reasons.
No its not "deviant". Careful with the wording or the report is coming.
 
Yes and this is wrong. scientifically because it confuses sex and gender. But that's not surprising, usually academic books of that type are quite slow to catch up with reality, we have this problem in France.


Yes. Hypothetical. Just to show you that planet don't come in pairs. You are trying to put symbolism on nature, its completely unscientific.



No its not "deviant". Careful with the wording or the report is coming.
report away,moron.Its is a deviant behavior in most societies since recorded history.Deviant=doesn't carry moral judgment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree that its not the standard and not normal. It still occurs naturally, therefore its natural, as opposed to being artificial/man made as al sama explained. Thats just it. No justification on my part, for the 3538494943rd time jesus christ
Post automatically merged:


So what do the sex organs do when they are infertile?

And do old people become unnatural when they lose fertility, because their sex organs cant do the "intended function" anymore?
Back to straw-manning, holy shit.

I am talking to a wall at this point.

When they become infertile, in the case of males, women find other "fertile" males.

It is a natural and gradual process. And it does not happen in 100% of the male population.

God dammit, I don't even know where you are trying to get at with this horrendous example.
Post automatically merged:

Yes and this is wrong. scientifically because it confuses sex and gender. But that's not surprising, usually academic books of that type are quite slow to catch up with reality, we have this problem in France.


Yes. Hypothetical. Just to show you that planet don't come in pairs. You are trying to put symbolism on nature, its completely unscientific.



No its not "deviant". Careful with the wording or the report is coming.
Saying unscientific and using "hypothetical" scenarios to justify such a take.

On a second thought, it proves that if there is "matter", there is also "anti-matter". So, again, everything is in pairs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Logiko
deviant
adjective
1. departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behaviour
in most societies this behavior has being perceived as out of the norm.
Post automatically merged:

Yes and this is wrong. scientifically because it confuses sex and gender. But that's not surprising, usually academic books of that type are quite slow to catch up with reality, we have this problem in France.


Yes. Hypothetical. Just to show you that planet don't come in pairs. You are trying to put symbolism on nature, its completely unscientific.



No its not "deviant". Careful with the wording or the report is coming.
Wokes want to bend reality
 
Saying unscientific and using "hypothetical" scenarios to justify a retarded take.
You are trying to put symbolism on nature. And I proved to you that nature is not necessaraly binary. So its completely unscientific. Just accept the contradiction.


@Logiko
deviant
adjective
1. departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behaviour
in most societies this behavior has being perceived as out of the norm.
Post automatically merged:


Wokes want to bend reality
Ok. I give you that one. Indeed sociology don't put a moral value on the term.


Identity and the acceptance of homosexuality in society.
 
You are trying to put symbolism on nature. And I proved to you that nature is not necessaraly binary. So its completely unscientific. Just accept the contradiction.



Ok. I give you that one. Indeed sociology don't put a moral value on the term.



Identity and the acceptance of homosexuality in society.
Your own example worked against you.

Matter
Anti matter

Still a pair. Accept it.
Post automatically merged:

Comparing homosexuality in humans with animals.

And comparing other animal behaviours with humans like cannibalism, necrophilia, and coprophagia (eating poop).
 
Back to straw-manning, holy shit.

I am talking to a wall at this point.

When they become infertile, in the case of males, women find other "fertile" males.

It is a natural and gradual process. And it does not happen in 100% of the male population.

God dammit, I don't even know where you are trying to get at with this horrendous example.
who singled out the males though?

so it is natural in some cases where reproductive organs are not used for reproduction.

for example infertility or homosexuality.
 
who singled out the males though?

so it is natural in some cases where reproductive organs are not used for reproduction.

for example infertility or homosexuality.
Then what's the difference between using s*x toys, mast***tion, and such activities?
All of this is not natural.

Some hunters uselessly kill animals (not for food) and say they find pleasure and happiness in doing so. The question is, where we should draw a line to stop seeking pleasures?
There is no end to this.
What about pedos? 🤮🤮🤮
Maybe they also have a justification for their behavior?
 
Top