No, I argued that natural purpose of sex organs is reproduction.
Then, the instinctive desire to seek pleasure is also natural. But, that's where the problem is.
I think I am not being clear enough.
Lets say you have a knife. The manufacturer of that knife said it is meant to cut fruits only.
"Cutting fruits" becomes its intended and natural purpose.
But, you start cutting tree branches or other stuff with the knife. While you can argue that the use is still natural because it is a sharp object, but you need to understand what manufacturer said.
Yes, I am using religious element when I explain this. You can notice the influence. This is why it sounds absurd to you.
Then, the instinctive desire to seek pleasure is also natural. But, that's where the problem is.
I think I am not being clear enough.
Lets say you have a knife. The manufacturer of that knife said it is meant to cut fruits only.
"Cutting fruits" becomes its intended and natural purpose.
But, you start cutting tree branches or other stuff with the knife. While you can argue that the use is still natural because it is a sharp object, but you need to understand what manufacturer said.
Yes, I am using religious element when I explain this. You can notice the influence. This is why it sounds absurd to you.
It sounds absurd because it is. Because you are pushing your religious element on the basic definition of natural where it doesnt belong.
Post automatically merged:
Destruction?
I dont know where you are trying to get at with this.
I dont know where you are trying to get at with this.