He's always fighting with a sword lol..exactly like Fujitora
Its literally one aspect of his fighting style. Hell in ever battle he's in he use multiple df abilities. All of his finishing moves are DF abilities. He's yet to ever even attempt fighting with just his sword.
Anyway again if laws a swordsman in the same gen as Zoro, why are there no links between them? Why has Oda not given law any sword related focus in an arc specifically about samurai? Shit literally makes no sense. Besides Zoro hes the only other WG swordsman supposedly, yet in multiple arcs Oda hasn't played up on this literally at all.
What about it? What implies it will be relevant, laws explicitly stated he had no interest in it. Again fan theory's arent evidence. Where are these death flags on wano u speak of?
In punk hazard law was getting stomped by vergo then redeemed himself while zoro had possibly one of the most badass scenes in the manga so far.
When? He got beat up a lil because of a handicap then one shotted the second it was removed. Zoro did nothing of note this arc lol at scarring a low tier being bad ass. The smoker, vergo scene both shit on that by a huge margin.
Dressrosa law did nothing while zoro made the whole country look on in awe at his casual flex on pica .
Yep saving half the alliance, taking down an executive, and cause critical damage to doffy nothing lls. Yet just beating a single executive something. Zoro fan logic at it's finest lol y'all make it too easy.
You have to be a fool to think law will be comparable to zoro in wano so far zoro has had way better potrayal then law
What better potrayal is that? He's basically done nothing. His best feat was taking out killer, taking out Hawkins is obviously better.