[FNZ] Role Madness Metal Gear Mafia - Game Over: Patriots Win [Michelle Only Player Alive]
- Thread starter CakeWalker
- Start date
- Status
@Midnight Delight it appears to not be lynched you probably have to claim
Unless they roleblock you (assuming they have one), which is also a possibility.
Whatever your role is, we need a plan of action like I told Hime earlier. Make sure that if you have a one shot ability, you use it first unless your other ability/abilities calls for a different course of action.
So.
You have three options I'm going to give you:
1. Use your ability (abilities?) on Pot
2. Or use your shit on Orwellian
3. Orca
What I want you to do: Determine out of the three options you have who is the best candidate to use your shit on. Do not share this under any circumstances. Keep it unpredictable.
Lastly, can you give me an answer on whether your ability has any drawbacks such as temporarily nerfing a player or if it can be considered a "positive" action (like the Doctor - I'd classify this as a positive action. I'd classify a "negative" town role as something like a vig that can do harm like shooting town because of a wrong read. I hope that this makes sense.)
Can you give me an "aye aye cap'n"?
Whatever your role is, we need a plan of action like I told Hime earlier. Make sure that if you have a one shot ability, you use it first unless your other ability/abilities calls for a different course of action.
So.
You have three options I'm going to give you:
1. Use your ability (abilities?) on Pot
2. Or use your shit on Orwellian
3. Orca
What I want you to do: Determine out of the three options you have who is the best candidate to use your shit on. Do not share this under any circumstances. Keep it unpredictable.
Lastly, can you give me an answer on whether your ability has any drawbacks such as temporarily nerfing a player or if it can be considered a "positive" action (like the Doctor - I'd classify this as a positive action. I'd classify a "negative" town role as something like a vig that can do harm like shooting town because of a wrong read. I hope that this makes sense.)
Can you give me an "aye aye cap'n"?
Kooky idea: if we *hypothetically* have two power role soft claims today (I don't wish for this, I'm just brainstorming if there's more obstacles thrown our way), we could make it harder for scum to choose between Mid and (insert whoever.) This is if Fuji's read is correct.
How this works:
Scum has to choose between player A and B. They're either caught in a weird position on who to use it on, unless they feel spooked by someone else. This meanswe buy whoever survives time and an extra day to use their ability/abilities.
They're stuck in a rock and a hard place trying to see which is a bigger threat and try to determine which scummate might be targeted. It makes it difficult for them to steer things in an easier direction.
How this works:
Scum has to choose between player A and B. They're either caught in a weird position on who to use it on, unless they feel spooked by someone else. This meanswe buy whoever survives time and an extra day to use their ability/abilities.
They're stuck in a rock and a hard place trying to see which is a bigger threat and try to determine which scummate might be targeted. It makes it difficult for them to steer things in an easier direction.
Doesn't matter, PRs are PRs--if the role itself and the abilities are not revealed and remain hidden, they still have to consider whether 1) you're just bluffing and they feel comfortable killing you 2) A PR claim that's equally vague that might have the potential to fuck up their plans, especially depending on if we have a course of action for (insert whoever) like I just gave you
For future games don't say this tho lmfao, you're literally offering yourself on a silver platter unless it's a bluff (don't think that's your style tho)
2) imo is a good attempted coordination. The 3 options turn into 6, and they have to decide on whether the targets are right on the money or not. It overwhelms them over with so many choices to choose from.
For future games don't say this tho lmfao, you're literally offering yourself on a silver platter unless it's a bluff (don't think that's your style tho)
2) imo is a good attempted coordination. The 3 options turn into 6, and they have to decide on whether the targets are right on the money or not. It overwhelms them over with so many choices to choose from.
- Status