[FNZ] Role Madness Metal Gear Mafia - Game Over: Patriots Win [Michelle Only Player Alive]

Would you take part in part two using the same universe?


  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
I mistook it for the one you wrote in the dead chat and how Am I misrepresenting anything?
I never said you were doing so wilfully, just that you are. Frankly, I'd rather have less discussion in general about all this until I can get to the bottom of it, it isn't helping the matter.
 
Watson didn't understand he role. That was evident. I asked her if she understood her role. She explained it - and she didn't understand it. So I explained her role to her again.

I made a joke in an earlier day phase that if she didn't shoot her gun in 10 minutes, she would turn in a GumGum Man. Clearly that is a One Piece joke, and not me telling her to shoot anyone
 
Watson didn't understand he role. That was evident. I asked her if she understood her role. She explained it - and she didn't understand it. So I explained her role to her again.

I made a joke in an earlier day phase that if she didn't shoot her gun in 10 minutes, she would turn in a GumGum Man. Clearly that is a One Piece joke, and not me telling her to shoot anyone
I believe you.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
Watson didn't understand he role. That was evident. I asked her if she understood her role. She explained it - and she didn't understand it. So I explained her role to her again.

I made a joke in an earlier day phase that if she didn't shoot her gun in 10 minutes, she would turn in a GumGum Man. Clearly that is a One Piece joke, and not me telling her to shoot anyone
I will point you to my latest response, quoted below:
Like I've told you, I haven't made any decision yet. I will likely be sleeping on it to deliberate the matter anyway.

My question, and really this is closer to what I believe you should have done, is that you did explain the role earlier in the game. After that point, no further explanation was forthcoming. I believe that if you were not convinced that she understood the role, you ought to have explained it in other terms, or made sure that the current explanation suffices, rather than leaving it for a week and then picking it back up in LyLo. I accept your claim that your intent came from the thread and not anywhere else, but as a host, if you're going to ask players about their role understanding proactively, then you ought to be fully convinced that they do understand it, before leaving the conversation be and then coming back to it.
My sticking point here is about 6 days passed between your first discussion on the role, and then the later clarification that appears to have led her to shooting a Mafia member. So I just need to understand why it was left a week to check back in if you were not otherwise content as to her understanding of the role, and why you didn't refer back to your previous conversation. This isn't a right or wrong question, I need to know what your thought process was.
 
She was explained her role in the thread, and it didnt make sense for what her role was.
I shared multiple people roles in the thread, so dead people knew about peoples powers
 

Peroroncino

🅷🅰🅻🅰 🅼🅰🅳🆁🅸🅳
I will point you to my latest response, quoted below:

My sticking point here is about 6 days passed between your first discussion on the role, and then the later clarification that appears to have led her to shooting a Mafia member. So I just need to understand why it was left a week to check back in if you were not otherwise content as to her understanding of the role, and why you didn't refer back to your previous conversation. This isn't a right or wrong question, I need to know what your thought process was.
because a certain someone on dead chat asked her to remind watson
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top