Status
Not open for further replies.
It is definitely possible it's just COA yeah or at most, a mix of 2.
Then why Kaido said in that exact page that Luffy is using CoC, though?

And also, there isn't a single attack in the fight with haki trails like the one we saw in 1010 from Luffy.
Actually, logically speaking, even if Kaido did not say it out loud, what reasons Luffy could have to not use CoC against Kaido? None

But it's always that problem with haki and drawings, because all is so much left to interpretation
 

Elder Lee Hung

Conqueror of the Stars
@Elder Lee Hung @MarineHQ @ZenZu so Kizaru wasn't "unfazed" at all when being grabbed. And Snakeman conveniently didn't use any advanced Haki.

Tho still a good feat blocking Snakeman like that.
Alright so you already know what I’m going to ask lol, how do you know Luffy wasn’t using advanced Haki? So far as I can tell, Luffy is just constantly using FS in combat now lol, and as for internal destruction Haki:




This shit is just indistinguishable from regular CoA.

So it would seem to me like restrained Kizaru just dominated a stronger version of rooftop Luffy, lol
 
Alright so you already know what I’m going to ask lol, how do you know Luffy wasn’t using advanced Haki? So far as I can tell, Luffy is just constantly using FS in combat now lol, and as for internal destruction Haki:




This shit is just indistinguishable from regular CoA.

So it would seem to me like restrained Kizaru just dominated a stronger version of rooftop Luffy, lol
« Dominated » doesn’t tell the truth.
he straight up low diffed him without breaking a sweat lol
 







Three images of Snakeman, be honest for a second and tell me what Oda was going for when he drew this chapter.
No doubt, but what I am saying is that we only saw one panel of the "fight", we didn't see the charging of the hits and Oda is totally inconsistent with drawings.

Honestly, isn't the pic I posted in G5 totally comparable to a random CoA usage of DR or WC?
We only know it was ACoC because Kaido told us and because it wouldn't make any sense the opposite.
 

ConquistadoR

The Rogue Prince
No doubt, but what I am saying is that we only saw one panel of the "fight", we didn't see the charging of the hits and Oda is totally inconsistent with drawings.

Honestly, isn't the pic I posted in G5 totally comparable to a random CoA usage of DR or WC?
We only know it was ACoC because Kaido told us and because it wouldn't make any sense the opposite.
He drew an entire page of Kizaru v. Snakeman.
If he wanted to draw Luffy using CoC, it was really simple to do so and he didn't.

There ends the discussion regarding CoC.
 
Isn't the attack landed with CoC coating? besides, just because dialogue coincides with the panel does not necessarily talking in the context of that panel.
The problem is that in all the fight with Kaido there isn't a single instance of a haki trail or no-touching (bar for the Bajatang gun, but mostly because Luffy said it).

If we randomly took panels of G5's fight without knowing anything, the haki usage would be totally indistinguishable from the CoA used against Kata, just to say one.
 
Alright so you already know what I’m going to ask lol, how do you know Luffy wasn’t using advanced Haki? So far as I can tell, Luffy is just constantly using FS in combat now lol, and as for internal destruction Haki:




This shit is just indistinguishable from regular CoA.

So it would seem to me like restrained Kizaru just dominated a stronger version of rooftop Luffy, lol
We know that Luffy can decide to use or not to use internal destruction, as he didn't use it against Page One but did use it against Kaido. If Luffy isn't using barrier and ACoC, it's not a save bet that he uses internal destruction. He could, but he could not either. Kizaru so far hasn't made commentary on an advanced usage of ACoA either.
 
We know that Luffy can decide to use or not to use internal destruction, as he didn't use it against Page One but did use it against Kaido. If Luffy isn't using barrier and ACoC, it's not a save bet that he uses internal destruction. He could, but he could not either. Kizaru so far hasn't made commentary on an advanced usage of ACoA either.
long winded way of saying it has to be an assumption
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top