While you didn't explicitly said that Kizaru needs to char Luffy body, you used a charred body as a example of damage clearly suggesting that this is what you expect to be actual damage, while ignoring that not only the charred parts were a gag by G5 (and not a clear indication of damage) but also that the attack was eaten. Also ignoring that the last we saw of Luffy he was still releasing the energy (while complaining) and we didn't see the actual effects of the attack to claim that it did or didn't do anything.
This is the reason I asked what you actually consider damage. I was actually curious. But now I see that you are just agenda posting. Sorry for misunderstand you.
Have a nice day.
This is the reason I asked what you actually consider damage. I was actually curious. But now I see that you are just agenda posting. Sorry for misunderstand you.
Have a nice day.