Powers & Abilities Destroying the myth: Named attacks are superior to no named attacks

wrongidea

wrongidea

‎
#41
#41
Erkan12 said:
Zolo's second giant slash to Golem Pica was not named:



His cheapshot attack to Apoo was not named as well:



That argument is flawed in every way.
Click to expand...
What you tryna say? those Regular Slash is Equal to Sanzen Sekai? Even When using Sanzen Sekai there's 2 type of it.

The second immage it's clearly an Iai technique with one sword, it's Shishi Sonson.
 
Blazing Lion

Blazing Lion

‎
#45
#45
Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier said:
Bro was spitting why did he get banned
Click to expand...
I thought the no named shit was used for general attacks, not special moves. Sometimes characters clash with named moves and other times with non special moves. A named move signifies specialness which translates to usually a more powerful attack. There are times when certain moves are similar but no name is shouted and a case can be made that both were the same. For example, the Shishi Sonson on Apoo by Zoro, one can make the case that it was the same attack but no name was shouted, which was probably done by the author to show Zoro's mood at that time, the context required that the character didn't do that. Though he is smiling the next instant talking to Chopper so again it is up for debate. The style seemed similar, the power does not because Zoro behead the PH dragon with this and Apoo being more durable than that is a stretch but then he has survived quite a lot in the raid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top