@Monkey D Al Here, you wanted to be tagged
Post automatically merged:
How do you call the bombing of their own hostages? Is this still 'retaliation' to you?
Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
When it's all set and done I hope you'll magically grow a fucking conscience so that you can never get a blink of sleep ever again. This is some disgusting ass shit, people like you don't have a right to complain about terrorism and the murder of innocents when you excuse and support the same exact shit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive
The full text of directive has never been published and until 2003 Israeli military censorship even forbade any discussion of the subject in the press. The directive has been changed several times. At one time the formulation was that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."[2]
The Hannibal directive has, at times, apparently existed in two different versions, one top-secret written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and one "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter versions, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was "better dead than abducted". In 2011, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz stated the directive does not permit killing IDF soldiers.[3]
The Hannibal directive has not prevented the capture of a single Israeli soldier.[4]
The full text of directive has never been published and until 2003 Israeli military censorship even forbade any discussion of the subject in the press. The directive has been changed several times. At one time the formulation was that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."[2]
The Hannibal directive has, at times, apparently existed in two different versions, one top-secret written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and one "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter versions, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was "better dead than abducted". In 2011, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz stated the directive does not permit killing IDF soldiers.[3]
The Hannibal directive has not prevented the capture of a single Israeli soldier.[4]
A US-led effort to allow humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip and provide an exit from the bombarded territory for foreign nationals faltered on Monday, despite international warnings of the mounting human toll from the Israel-Hamas war.
[...]
Two ministers in Netanyahu’s government also vehemently rejected the idea of opening Rafah, with energy minister Israel Katz saying he “bitterly opposes” such a step.
“Our commitment is to the families of the murdered and kidnapped hostages — not to the Hamas murderers and those who helped them,” Katz said.
In comments that highlight the emotions stirred by the conflict, he accused the UN of becoming a “propaganda arm of a terrorist Isis organisation”.
[...]
Two ministers in Netanyahu’s government also vehemently rejected the idea of opening Rafah, with energy minister Israel Katz saying he “bitterly opposes” such a step.
“Our commitment is to the families of the murdered and kidnapped hostages — not to the Hamas murderers and those who helped them,” Katz said.
In comments that highlight the emotions stirred by the conflict, he accused the UN of becoming a “propaganda arm of a terrorist Isis organisation”.
Because they’re not a resistance, they are ideologically driven to kill every Israeli. Apparently their orders were “kill as much as you can”
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/is...ticizes-israeli-response-qnYiTMMNVllFq1upZmES
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/world/middleeast/arab-israeli-hamas-attacks.html
I mean we have 200 years of history to show that America really doesn’t go into recessions due to wars
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/is...ticizes-israeli-response-qnYiTMMNVllFq1upZmES
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/world/middleeast/arab-israeli-hamas-attacks.html
Post automatically merged:
Lmao wait and watch.
If america actually interferes , which they will.
Average American will suffer again.
If america actually interferes , which they will.
Average American will suffer again.