If you think as scum I decide to fake claim something that's flagrantly designed to fail to confirm something then that's on you, too. It's a poor reas of my ethos as scum - I stick close to the truth because that enables me to "confirm" my role easier without actually doing so. The janitor part is a demerit that prevents me from being confirmed upon my revival.
I've already gone over why I shot Orwellian. If it were because I was "questioned" then you're going to have to explain why you and Al are not dead too. Your survival should indicate to you that it has nothing to do with that, I shot him because I believed he had plausible scum equity with Ultra, and I felt that in the event he was town, he would not be very helpful in solving the game due to his tendency to argue in bad faith/lie to backfill his reasoning. You can disagree but whether you agree or disagree is not the point - it's whether you think it's a genuine process of thought from me or not.
As for the last point, you simultaneously argue that my role looks fake, but also it's too strong. I think that makes my argument for me, the lack of credibility the claim has evidences why it oans out for a town role.
I don't expect any of this to change your mind to be honest. It's probably more productive if you ask me about specific players so I can go over them tomorrow, otherwise you already know where I'm at positionally with the game so there isn't really much more input for me to offer.