Yes, Oda writes everything instinctively. Only Logiko understands the mind behind the best-selling manga of all time. 
Post automatically merged:
WHERE IS CARIBOU
Last edited:
General & Others Next Straw Hat Crew Members and the Grand Fleet
- Thread starter Uncle Van
- Start date
- Tags #c4ng2g carrot fans are still losers carrot haters are real losers seethe at the rabbit carrot is doing nothing because she doesn't matter carrot will never join the straw hats carrot's story never even began cry about carrot everyone else in the verse neg diffs the bunny imagine thinking stussy won't join its over furry bros keep the bunny on zou nobody else needs her let it go furry bros momo is breeding yamato no character is less relevant than carrot oden larper fans can't read stussy > carrot & yamato stussy supremacy who will be the next nakama of the week? yamato always had a better chance than carrot yamato story is over
I’ve heard my fair share of delusional statements during my 3 years here at Worstgen but somebody actually unironically believing he understands the story better than the fucking author is a new low I never thought we would reach.
In our hearts
In our hearts
Can you quote me where I said that please ? 
Sure ^^
No mate. With Lucci, I don't even need to go to my second step. Lucci doesn't pass the basic rules.
That would be quite a sight hehe
He is not and I explained why. read the rules.
Not only unimportant. BAD, in the sence that it is METHODOLOGICALLY BAD.
Nah, even if Lucci joins, I won't add it, simply because this is a bad theory. VERY BAD. Sorry but I was a complotist one, I don't want to uses the same methods I used before again. This would be illogical at best. Dangerous at worst.
Nop lol
Yes they are mate.
Oh, yes obviously, because its worded differently.
What is the point of reading if you can't understand ?
Of course at the condition that you are being reasonnable and non bias. Because trust me, a bias personn will read science and say that it is BS. I got that everyday on this forum.
You can, you just need to want to lol #biases.
The question is not "are my reasonnings logical" its "are your mindset non biases and are you willing to put Lucci down"
No I meant that it is a surprise because you are showing the character traits of a complotist, and not an analyst.
Do you think Oda writes everything instinctively ? That weird.
Oh boi no. I would hope to, but this guy is out of this earth
One month to plot a 5+ year ending ? Damn, that's fast.
So you think Oda does everything instinctively like @ShiShiShi ? Weird
Who ?
You realize that with you saying that Lucci will never join and such, you are currently only playing into my cards, right? 
All I see here, is that you are already trying to wriggle out of the situation you have brought yourself in, with all that rambling.
All I see here, is that you are already trying to wriggle out of the situation you have brought yourself in, with all that rambling.
No mate. With Lucci, I don't even need to go to my second step. Lucci doesn't pass the basic rules.
That would be quite a sight hehe
He is not and I explained why. read the rules.
Not only unimportant. BAD, in the sence that it is METHODOLOGICALLY BAD.
Nah, even if Lucci joins, I won't add it, simply because this is a bad theory. VERY BAD. Sorry but I was a complotist one, I don't want to uses the same methods I used before again. This would be illogical at best. Dangerous at worst.
Nop lol
Yes they are mate.
Oh, yes obviously, because its worded differently.
What is the point of reading if you can't understand ?
Of course at the condition that you are being reasonnable and non bias. Because trust me, a bias personn will read science and say that it is BS. I got that everyday on this forum.
You can, you just need to want to lol #biases.
The question is not "are my reasonnings logical" its "are your mindset non biases and are you willing to put Lucci down"
No I meant that it is a surprise because you are showing the character traits of a complotist, and not an analyst.
Do you think Oda writes everything instinctively ? That weird.
Oh boi no. I would hope to, but this guy is out of this earth
One month to plot a 5+ year ending ? Damn, that's fast.
So you think Oda does everything instinctively like @ShiShiShi ? Weird
Who ?
Can you quote me where I said that please ?
Sure ^^
No mate. With Lucci, I don't even need to go to my second step. Lucci doesn't pass the basic rules.
That would be quite a sight hehe
He is not and I explained why. read the rules.
Not only unimportant. BAD, in the sence that it is METHODOLOGICALLY BAD.
Nah, even if Lucci joins, I won't add it, simply because this is a bad theory. VERY BAD. Sorry but I was a complotist one, I don't want to uses the same methods I used before again. This would be illogical at best. Dangerous at worst.
Nop lol
Yes they are mate.
Oh, yes obviously, because its worded differently.
What is the point of reading if you can't understand ?
Of course at the condition that you are being reasonnable and non bias. Because trust me, a bias personn will read science and say that it is BS. I got that everyday on this forum.
You can, you just need to want to lol #biases.
The question is not "are my reasonnings logical" its "are your mindset non biases and are you willing to put Lucci down"
No I meant that it is a surprise because you are showing the character traits of a complotist, and not an analyst.
Do you think Oda writes everything instinctively ? That weird.
Oh boi no. I would hope to, but this guy is out of this earth
One month to plot a 5+ year ending ? Damn, that's fast.
So you think Oda does everything instinctively like @ShiShiShi ? Weird
Who ?
Sure ^^
No mate. With Lucci, I don't even need to go to my second step. Lucci doesn't pass the basic rules.
That would be quite a sight hehe
He is not and I explained why. read the rules.
Not only unimportant. BAD, in the sence that it is METHODOLOGICALLY BAD.
Nah, even if Lucci joins, I won't add it, simply because this is a bad theory. VERY BAD. Sorry but I was a complotist one, I don't want to uses the same methods I used before again. This would be illogical at best. Dangerous at worst.
Nop lol
Yes they are mate.
Oh, yes obviously, because its worded differently.
What is the point of reading if you can't understand ?
Of course at the condition that you are being reasonnable and non bias. Because trust me, a bias personn will read science and say that it is BS. I got that everyday on this forum.
You can, you just need to want to lol #biases.
The question is not "are my reasonnings logical" its "are your mindset non biases and are you willing to put Lucci down"
No I meant that it is a surprise because you are showing the character traits of a complotist, and not an analyst.
Do you think Oda writes everything instinctively ? That weird.
Oh boi no. I would hope to, but this guy is out of this earth
One month to plot a 5+ year ending ? Damn, that's fast.
So you think Oda does everything instinctively like @ShiShiShi ? Weird
Who ?
So, since we do not agree on this matter, the only way we can settle this is by proof. And this is why I will simply just wait for Oda to make Lucci join in this arc. Then we will have a distinctive answer.
You’re illiterate ? Weird. 
When I say.. "a lot of author OFTEN DO THINGS instinctively"...
You read..
"Oda write EVERYTHING instinctively" ?
Just to be sure if I'm being illiterate here..
Don't take it too personnally bro. That's just how I reply to post, I always shred post into piece as it permits to take all the arguments one by one with consideration.
Can't wait
Bingo!! You now have the reason why you can't understand my points
Are you sure about that ? Or are you projecting you own behavior here ?
I'm not the one who distords every single one of your arguments here lol
No you can't lol. Precisely because I'm always very careful to reply (beside ironic exception like the one previously) with the most care and precision to your arguments without distording them.
But you guys are Kings in term of intellectual lazyness so when I say "I won't believe Oda because of X reason in some cases" you think and write "You think you know better than Oda about the story".
This king of strawman is a regular thing I have to deal with you guys, its everyday in at least 1 post out of 3. But don't worry, I saw worst so this doesn't bother me.
So.. let me be sure here.
When I say.. "a lot of author OFTEN DO THINGS instinctively"...
You read..
"Oda write EVERYTHING instinctively" ?
Just to be sure if I'm being illiterate here..
Don't take it too personnally bro. That's just how I reply to post, I always shred post into piece as it permits to take all the arguments one by one with consideration.
Can't wait
Bingo!! You now have the reason why you can't understand my points
Are you sure about that ? Or are you projecting you own behavior here ?
I'm not the one who distords every single one of your arguments here lol
No you can't lol. Precisely because I'm always very careful to reply (beside ironic exception like the one previously) with the most care and precision to your arguments without distording them.
But you guys are Kings in term of intellectual lazyness so when I say "I won't believe Oda because of X reason in some cases" you think and write "You think you know better than Oda about the story".
This king of strawman is a regular thing I have to deal with you guys, its everyday in at least 1 post out of 3. But don't worry, I saw worst so this doesn't bother me.
When I say.. "a lot of author OFTEN DO THINGS instinctively"...
You read..
"Oda write EVERYTHING instinctively" ?
Just to be sure if I'm being illiterate here..
Don't take it too personnally bro. That's just how I reply to post, I always shred post into piece as it permits to take all the arguments one by one with consideration.
Can't wait
Bingo!! You now have the reason why you can't understand my points
Are you sure about that ? Or are you projecting you own behavior here ?
I'm not the one who distords every single one of your arguments here lol
No you can't lol. Precisely because I'm always very careful to reply (beside ironic exception like the one previously) with the most care and precision to your arguments without distording them.
But you guys are Kings in term of intellectual lazyness so when I say "I won't believe Oda because of X reason in some cases" you think and write "You think you know better than Oda about the story".
This king of strawman is a regular thing I have to deal with you guys, its everyday in at least 1 post out of 3. But don't worry, I saw worst so this doesn't bother me.
