Do you mind elaborating?
Sure

You and a group of 20 families decided to buy a farm town. In this time you guys live in communes, there’s no hierarchy, no social classes and you guys can sell just what is needed to pay taxes to the state

mind you this is more ML as the proletariat will still live under a state, but in a true liberal society it should be possible
 
Sure

You and a group of 20 families decided to buy a farm town. In this time you guys live in communes, there’s no hierarchy, no social classes and you guys can sell just what is needed to pay taxes to the state

mind you this is more ML as the proletariat will still live under a state, but in a true liberal society it should be possible
On paper? Sure. But we know that inflation and the current stage capitalism doesn't allow for something like that, at least not from scratch. Our generation doesn't own any wealth in comparison to our parents.
 
It isn’t lol. The left right paradigm began with the rise of liberalism back in the 1800s. Liberalism is quite literally the birth of leftism.
Politic is not something that is fixed in time. in sociology concept needs to be understood in a time a spatial context. If liberalism might be a leftist concept at first, it is now what distinguish the left from the right.


also fyi in case you didn’t know, communism is socialism
No. They are related, but not the same.

Hard disagree. Communism can exist in a liberal society, so can socialism.
Socialism can, not communism.

You and a group of 20 families decided to buy a farm town. In this time you guys live in communes, there’s no hierarchy, no social classes and you guys can sell just what is needed to pay taxes to the state

mind you this is more ML as the proletariat will still live under a state, but in a true liberal society it should be possible
Then the society is the commune. Not the state.
 
Politic is not something that is fixed in time. in sociology concept needs to be understood in a time a spatial context. If liberalism might be a leftist concept at first, it is now what distinguish the left from the right.
You said the “basis” aka the origin of something. But regardless, you claim to be a leftist and have not read a single theory? Lol

No. They are related, but not the same.
Communism is socialism the same way a square is a rectangle. Marx used those terms interchangeably.

Then the society is the commune. Not the state.
Communism combining with the state is more of a Marxist Leninist thing. Besides I said communist society.
 
You said the “basis” aka the origin of something.
By basis I mean the foundamental principles.
But regardless, you claim to be a leftist and have not read a single theory? Lol
I do things differently. Instead of reading theories about leftism, I surround myself by those who I feel are the most coherent, human, optimist and more grounded into our reality, here, Leftists, communists, sometimes anarchist, artist and scientists.
Only when I'm ready to read and learn about a concept I start reading and seeking knowledge about it. The road to real leftism is slow, at least for me.


Communism is socialism the same way a square is a rectangle. Marx used those terms interchangeably.
PErhaps, but Marx doesn't live in our timeline right now. And right now, communism and socialism are two very different things. You can't always use old windows to look at the present reality. You need to adapt the instrument of mesure.


Communism combining with the state is more of a Marxist Leninist thing. Unless you think that is the true form of communism a commune can pretty much be communist
I don't have enough knowledge to reply to this. All I can say is the logical thing: If you build a commune, then the commune becomes the system.
 
PErhaps, but Marx doesn't live in our timeline right now. And right now, communism and socialism are two very different things. You can't always use old windows to look at the present reality. You need to adapt the instrument of mesure.
unless you’re a ML, or a democratic socialist. At the barebones communism and socialism are pretty much the same thing. With the exception of maybe the whole “no state” thing from Marx

btw I don’t use those interchangeably, this just all theory talk
 
You really don't understand how regulating AI is one of the most important challenges of our time. No one is saying we should stop AI, but you just want to let it take over and let companies automate most of their labor, which is beyond cringe and out of touch.
Yeah unregulated AIs is the way. Just like unregulated DNA editing.

I don’t care about your opinion. Just ignore me if you think my posts are Cr1NgeYyyy
 
I find it disgusting you would insinuate such. You know not my life, nor my circumstances. I offered you the chance at dialogue in a real call so you might see that I am not some kind of bigot. I did know what trans was. I still do. But it's through an intimate EXPERIENCE of being trans that I know something you don't -- and likely never will.

There is an entire community of people like me in the UK. Research me. Research US. Detransitioners are fucking real. I no longer identify as female, but I did for 8 whole years.
[automerge]1699627585[/automerge]


Thank you bro.
[automerge]1699627690[/automerge]


For the record it was a process of years of deprogramming. Of deep psychological change. If you ever want to -listen- like you claim you do, you'll know where to find me.
What was it like being a girl for 8 years?

Did you come to any profound realization on the different ways men and women are treated in society?
 
You don't really know what intersectionnality means do you ?
Are religious and ethnic minorities part of lgbtqi+ ?

No, lgbtq shit doesnt encompass the entirety of intersectionality.
[automerge]1699644185[/automerge]
Thats what others are doing with the gender stuff but they are bigoted apparently
[automerge]1699644231[/automerge]
You mean people with dissociative identity disorder ? For example a person who can suddenly develop a personnality where they are a dog or a fictionnal character ? Those people are legitimate. As long as they don't hurt anyone, noone should hurt them.
Disagreeing with them being dogs is bigoted then?
 
Infographics like these are extremely reductive and imo wrong lol
No. Sometime things are simple. The reason why there is two sides in politic is very simple. There are values in conflict and those value are usually formed together. Meaning that you will most likely tend to believe in capitalism and invidualism if you are an hard core believer of free will.

But there is something you also must understand (and that I didn't right here) The blue side is basing its ideology into fantasy while the red side is basing its reasonning in reality.

That's why most scientist tend to be either centrist or leftists.


No. LGBTQ+ concerns identity related to genre and sexuality.

Thats what others are doing with the gender stuff but they are bigoted apparently
The difference is that I didn't deny the racialization process which is a social process. So its completely different.


Disagreeing with them being dogs is bigoted then?
AS long as you don't hurt those people it should be ok.
 
the fact that you say I, the person with a more solid worldview than some guy who flips political identity’s like pancakes at a dinner is on shaky ground is hilarious
What is a political identity?
I didn't watch any footage of it.That is what i was told.
And this is your problem. You don't look up things and go by hearsay and rumors.
you got a link,bro?
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/08/americas/demonstrators-killed-mining-protests-panama/index.html
This graphic is plain .wrong.
[automerge]1699644746[/automerge]
No. Sometime things are simple. The reason why there is two sides in politic is very simple.
And yet another plain wrong statemen. There aren't 2 sides in politics ,that's merely a myth
 
Top