Controversial General Political Discussion

NAMELESS

NAMELESS

‎
#30,304
#30,304
Starbound Beast D. Draig said:
:gonope:

:goyea:
Click to expand...
you can see my dickhead in this pic.take it down plz
Post automatically merged:

Logiko said:
People were shot, Policemen were injured, furniture and windows were broken, offices were saccaged and robbed, members had to hide for their lives. You may have found video of protesters being peaceful, but there are more of protesters being violent. Don't fall into the trap of the far right.
Click to expand...
riot=/=insurrection
Post automatically merged:

Ravagerblade said:
If C4N and Ricky Berwick had a fight. I'd bet money on Ricky Winning.
Click to expand...
i just googled who that is,i will never complain about my life again
 
Last edited:
ArturCantSpeakJapanese

ArturCantSpeakJapanese

‎
#30,305
#30,305
Logiko said:
Are you for real ? They tried to break into the office ! Which lead to a agent shooting a woman.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...743642-60e2-11eb-9430-e7c77b5b0297_story.html

Stop listening to far right propaganda


This is not the question. Breaking in into official gov office is one of the sign of insurection. Its not only about human beings.



Again, no. Those who risked the most were those who were targeted by the mob in the first place, the representatives.

You are leaning dangerously into far right rethoric here, careful. This was not the exercise of a constitutional right here, this was a planned insurrection lead by Trump.



Violent city riot of BLM don't attack the capitol. They target urban furniture. Its a perfectly legitimate way to express anger contrary to a COUP.


https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/dec/11/1

Careful with "neutrality" in politic.
Click to expand...
anything a police union says is far right propaganda imho
 
TheAncientCenturion

TheAncientCenturion

I will never forgive Oda
‎‎‎
#30,311
#30,311
Logiko said:
Are you for real ? They tried to break into the office ! Which lead to a agent shooting a woman.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...743642-60e2-11eb-9430-e7c77b5b0297_story.html

Stop listening to far right propaganda


This is not the question. Breaking in into official gov office is one of the sign of insurection. Its not only about human beings.



Again, no. Those who risked the most were those who were targeted by the mob in the first place, the representatives.

You are leaning dangerously into far right rethoric here, careful. This was not the exercise of a constitutional right here, this was a planned insurrection lead by Trump.



Violent city riot of BLM don't attack the capitol. They target urban furniture. Its a perfectly legitimate way to express anger contrary to a COUP.


https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/dec/11/1

Careful with "neutrality" in politic.
Click to expand...
The Swiss were very happy (and later intimidated) to work with the National Socialist German Workers Party. I’m just saying I’m neutral on Internet forums when it comes to discussing politics.

Id rather rage about power scaling then get into the weeds about this stuff
 
NAMELESS

NAMELESS

‎
#30,319
#30,319
Logiko said:
More reason to listen to them when they say that they had a lot of injuries during the insurrection. That's should be a wake up call.



Indeed.

January 6th was an insurrection. The BLM protest or what happened in France were riots.
Click to expand...
When sane people riot its an insurrection but when the leftie lunatics do the same its just a riot.I got it now.thnx
Post automatically merged:

Z-Saber said:
What do you all prefer to call what happened on Jan 6 if not an insurrection? You can argue it started peacefully but it did turn violent eventually.
Click to expand...
Insurrection is an armed conflict of much wider scale.They don't end in a couple of hours.
Post automatically merged:

TheAncientCenturion said:
I don’t get much out of political discussions irl with people I know, so there’s really nothing for me when it comes to arguing with strangers online.
Click to expand...
meh boring
 
Logiko

Logiko

‎
#30,320
#30,320
TheAncientCenturion said:
The Swiss were very happy (and later intimidated) to work with the National Socialist German Workers Party. I’m just saying I’m neutral on Internet forums when it comes to discussing politics.

Id rather rage about power scaling then get into the weeds about this stuff
Click to expand...
I understand the willingness to be neutral and apolitical as a way to hover over the political debate, I was there myself once. The problem with that is that it is a behavior that always favor the same side, the side of the conservatist and liberals.

That's why I talked about the problem of non action in mylast few posts. By not acting, we always favor the side that is inflicting damages. And in politic, the side that does that is the right side. This is the side that creates stereotypes, that denies patriarchy and the oppressions against women, that denies the systemic racism in the west, that reject LGBTQ+ people etc. The right is the side that denies reality and therefore the side that is hurting people.

So by doing nothing and staying neutral, we actually choose to let problematics and toxic behavior flourish without contradiction. This is why you can see here a group of a few far rightists that is able to make fun here of the only guys who has the balls to go against them and call them out without contradiction beside me.

By staying neutral, we are ALWAYS taking the side of the oppressors. Just like Switzerland did at the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top