Still the same, actually I think you're leaning a bit too much on gotchas with her. You're trying to read her from a purely logical analysis of her posts, and I don't really see a contradiction in her reasoning that you're trying to present.
You can argue that she attempted to defend Ekko, but all she really did was explain that activity isn't AI for him, which is true. I took it more as her questioning the read given on him over a defence. I also think her position makes sense in that she sees you tie her with Ekko and then push from there, I dont think she has any strong scum read on Ekko himself.
Not ready to say you're scum for it yet though, I don't think you have a great deal of experience with Michelle, but those are my considerations here anyway.