Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You know exactly what you're doing here. No serious medical institution would call homosexuality a mental disorder. All I see is your boundless hypocrisy and fake civility humper act where you pretend you're here to get along with others and be respectful.
Something I absolutely have no respect for is not owning up to your own shit, and you're the type of guy that twists and turns in order to justify his own hypocrisy. Even users who don't engage in this thread like Pero see right through you. Stop pretending you're above Solis. He might be a troll, but he isn't mean spirited like you.
Something I absolutely have no respect for is not owning up to your own shit, and you're the type of guy that twists and turns in order to justify his own hypocrisy. Even users who don't engage in this thread like Pero see right through you. Stop pretending you're above Solis. He might be a troll, but he isn't mean spirited like you.
I think status quo leftist propaganda to kids is brainwashing
and that's exactly what this social science is
nothing more then bs pushed by leftist elites of society that you carrot agree with
cause are not a enemy of the king's
you are servant of his, blindly believing his every word
cause you are a leftist
and leftism is the very system itself
the comapnies = leftist
the goverments = leftist
the world leans so far left cause right wing is counter culture
yes im anti science for social sciences
cause it promotes leftist
and leftist is the system
and i oppose the system ie treadeau ie biden ie femmists
everything link you post generally just reflects the leftist stances on the writer of the study or article
literally no different to what was done by me, posting whatever supports your already existing stance
your just pretentious, acting like the sources you cite are better when they are as opinionated as anything else
tons of sources say there's a bias
stop acting like your gender studies bs is the same as actual science
you dont need to be ideologue to accept the earth is round or that evolution happens
those are facts
leftsim is a idealogy, some liberal art majors agreeing with it dont make it anything more then that
I'm respectful to people that are respectful to me. I see you don't the history of the lgbt movement. It was part of the DSM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_DSM
Homosexuality was classified as a mental disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) beginning with the first edition, published in 1952 by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). This classification was challenged by gay rights activists in the years following the 1969 Stonewall riots, and in December 1973, the APA board of trustees voted to declassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. In 1974, the DSM was updated and homosexuality was replaced with a new diagnostic code for individuals distressed by their homosexuality. Distress over one's sexual orientation remained in the manual, under different names, until the DSM-5 in 2013.
Literal wikipedia stuff. A google search away. Like...google stuff,man. About Pero,he doesn't like me for other reasons. He thinks i should keep quiet because to him it looks like i want to show off as Europpean or American because i don't take shit from you guys. Sounds to me he suffers from "síndrome de vira lata". Solis is mean spiritied as fuck. This asshole constantly harasses me and i have called out moderatos about this a long time ago and nothing was done. Some people can get away with being assholes if they are friends of the moderatos it seems. Moderation here sucks btw.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_DSM
Homosexuality was classified as a mental disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) beginning with the first edition, published in 1952 by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). This classification was challenged by gay rights activists in the years following the 1969 Stonewall riots, and in December 1973, the APA board of trustees voted to declassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. In 1974, the DSM was updated and homosexuality was replaced with a new diagnostic code for individuals distressed by their homosexuality. Distress over one's sexual orientation remained in the manual, under different names, until the DSM-5 in 2013.
Literal wikipedia stuff. A google search away. Like...google stuff,man. About Pero,he doesn't like me for other reasons. He thinks i should keep quiet because to him it looks like i want to show off as Europpean or American because i don't take shit from you guys. Sounds to me he suffers from "síndrome de vira lata". Solis is mean spiritied as fuck. This asshole constantly harasses me and i have called out moderatos about this a long time ago and nothing was done. Some people can get away with being assholes if they are friends of the moderatos it seems. Moderation here sucks btw.
Last edited:
Listen,i can hear and write reasonably in English and i'm working on improving my speech. Barrier language is not the issue. Yeah,slurs are insulting. According to forums rules: baiting,cyber bully,calling names and so on should get you banned. Thing is that you guys didn't enforce this and some bad manners got normalized here. I think this forum actually lacks civility. its not just this thread,i see people calling each other retards over powerscaling and it seems nobody cares until things escalate into:" i will shoot you with my glock".
Dude quoting shit from 1952 as if science hasn't advanced and guidelines haven't been updated ever since. Being distressed over your sexual orientation doesn't mean you're mentally ill due to it, it's in reaction to something that might differ from cultural and societal expectations.
If you want real modern studies from real institutions then stop being disingenuous and read what they have to say, but you probably don't since it goes against what you believe it's true.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771012/
You are a raging homophobe, at least own up to it.
If you want real modern studies from real institutions then stop being disingenuous and read what they have to say, but you probably don't since it goes against what you believe it's true.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771012/
You are a raging homophobe, at least own up to it.
I'm so burned. Not. :holdthisl:
The raging homophobe literally has the whatsapp number of a gay users here and im talking to him like i talk to everyone else. You don't know me,pal. Stop projecting shit into me. If you use gay/faggot as in insult,its because you yourself thinks it a negative term(so does everyone else i know).
Last edited:
https://mashable.com/article/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-conservative-pages
facebook is left wing wtf
carrot, what's the deal thought all the status quo were far right nazis????
why they afarid of evil nazi men if they are fellow nazis
did the idealogical leftist pundit lie to me to push his dumb poltics, surely that's not possible
zucker just fears other nazis cause they are better at the art of facism.
trust me, some guy on twitter told me
facebook is left wing wtf
carrot, what's the deal thought all the status quo were far right nazis????
why they afarid of evil nazi men if they are fellow nazis
did the idealogical leftist pundit lie to me to push his dumb poltics, surely that's not possible
zucker just fears other nazis cause they are better at the art of facism.
trust me, some guy on twitter told me
Everyone and their mother calls each other faggot as an insult since the time of dinossaurs. I was talking about the insult itself and not the act of homosexuality. I wouldn't bang a dude. Bonny,hairy and stinky ass...fuck that,its gross.
[automerge]1707084049[/automerge]
I get the feeling you guys created this thread just for this.
[automerge]1707084152[/automerge]
Is being sick a fucking insult now? Are doctors bashing us all now? You can't make moral judgments about health issues.
[automerge]1707084049[/automerge]
I get the feeling you guys created this thread just for this.
[automerge]1707084152[/automerge]
Is being sick a fucking insult now? Are doctors bashing us all now? You can't make moral judgments about health issues.
"extreme Islamophobia" - lul
"He’s much too strong about the way he denies religion" said one scientist who got interviewed about dawkins in one of the sources. dawkins puts himself on a 6 at his 1-7 scale, so technically he is still an agnostic atheist. . .
"Ecklund said it is important to note that none of the scientists interviewed questioned Dawkins’ integrity as a scientist. Rather, they were critical of his representation of science to the public. "
and christopher hitchens isnt even a scientist himself, and his criticism of religion isnt based on science alot of the times.
and also lul at new atheism being right wing. not caring about political correctness and doing harsh criticism of religion doesnt make you right-wing.
so glossing over your sources, im not impressed. but well sure, i guess the "new atheists" do think science is the best way to acquire knowledge about our natural world. because, well, it is. and i dont think you disagree. or at least you shouldnt if you want to be consistent with the rest of your general claims.
[automerge]1707085230[/automerge]
nah, attacking the character instead of the argument IS a logical fallacy. no matter how much you want to rationalize it lmfao.
[automerge]1707085276[/automerge]
ye dont bother sharing french shit with me, unless it has proper english subtitles
"He’s much too strong about the way he denies religion" said one scientist who got interviewed about dawkins in one of the sources. dawkins puts himself on a 6 at his 1-7 scale, so technically he is still an agnostic atheist. . .
"Ecklund said it is important to note that none of the scientists interviewed questioned Dawkins’ integrity as a scientist. Rather, they were critical of his representation of science to the public. "
and christopher hitchens isnt even a scientist himself, and his criticism of religion isnt based on science alot of the times.
and also lul at new atheism being right wing. not caring about political correctness and doing harsh criticism of religion doesnt make you right-wing.
so glossing over your sources, im not impressed. but well sure, i guess the "new atheists" do think science is the best way to acquire knowledge about our natural world. because, well, it is. and i dont think you disagree. or at least you shouldnt if you want to be consistent with the rest of your general claims.
[automerge]1707085230[/automerge]
nah, attacking the character instead of the argument IS a logical fallacy. no matter how much you want to rationalize it lmfao.
[automerge]1707085276[/automerge]
ye dont bother sharing french shit with me, unless it has proper english subtitles
https://www.npr.org/2022/01/06/1070...nd-twitter-far-right-groups-lose-online-clout
Leftists status quo censored the right wing party on facebook
So much for a right wing status quo
Leftists status quo censored the right wing party on facebook
So much for a right wing status quo
you always rely on data and scientific researches?
scientism alert?!?!?
jokes aside, yeah no. i dont base my argumentation on any ideology. which is why you can find points of me agreeing with various ideologies, because i dont really subscribe to any one ideology myself. and i dont care to give examples for this again. there is only so much patience i have to repeat shit for you
[automerge]1707085490[/automerge]
well you gave me a source from a professor of religion on new atheism.
and how can you on one side say new atheism is paired with scientism and then say its becoming antiscientific?
as expected and predicted: convoluted nonsense
[automerge]1707085565[/automerge]
yes, im well aware, i studied both. and there was a complete lack of "woke" concepts in physics and math, but comparative religious science and educational science was full of it.
[automerge]1707085642[/automerge]
nah, im an actual science enthusiast. i do have my preferences regarding the field of science though. im not at all into chemistry, but alot into physics and biology.
[automerge]1707085758[/automerge]
is there a single poster you dont consider conservative?
i sure as hell dont consider myself conservative.
[automerge]1707085807[/automerge]
well you dont have to put all of it in one post. makes it almost as annoying to read as @Bob74h 's posts.
scientism alert?!?!?
jokes aside, yeah no. i dont base my argumentation on any ideology. which is why you can find points of me agreeing with various ideologies, because i dont really subscribe to any one ideology myself. and i dont care to give examples for this again. there is only so much patience i have to repeat shit for you
[automerge]1707085490[/automerge]
well you gave me a source from a professor of religion on new atheism.
and how can you on one side say new atheism is paired with scientism and then say its becoming antiscientific?
as expected and predicted: convoluted nonsense
[automerge]1707085565[/automerge]
yes, im well aware, i studied both. and there was a complete lack of "woke" concepts in physics and math, but comparative religious science and educational science was full of it.
[automerge]1707085642[/automerge]
nah, im an actual science enthusiast. i do have my preferences regarding the field of science though. im not at all into chemistry, but alot into physics and biology.
[automerge]1707085758[/automerge]
is there a single poster you dont consider conservative?
i sure as hell dont consider myself conservative.
[automerge]1707085807[/automerge]
well you dont have to put all of it in one post. makes it almost as annoying to read as @Bob74h 's posts.
Last edited:
i agree with this stuff for once
[automerge]1707086147[/automerge]
thats also his MO
[automerge]1707086205[/automerge]
eh if you forgot you were just making a mistake, technically not lying. lying is when you say something incorrect knowing that it is incorrect. you just forgot something, no big deal
[automerge]1707086344[/automerge]
"faggot" is not just calling someone gay, its a very derogatory term
[automerge]1707086147[/automerge]
thats also his MO
[automerge]1707086205[/automerge]
eh if you forgot you were just making a mistake, technically not lying. lying is when you say something incorrect knowing that it is incorrect. you just forgot something, no big deal
[automerge]1707086344[/automerge]
"faggot" is not just calling someone gay, its a very derogatory term