Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
But of course,hunting the sheep would be genocide. I'm simply saying do it like Poland:ban this shit,take anyone that has any affiliation with former communist party from any job in the public machine and ban them for life from politics. What of guerrila fighter and terrorist that will pop up?Kill them. Democracy was never about left x right.
This guy moved away from Colombia when he was a kid. He probably has a romanticized view of this. Colombia is socialist as fuck and so is Brazil. I believe criminals like Lula should get a life sentence or death sentence though.
The soviet union is no more. She lives in a former soviet block country.
Post automatically merged:
The soviet union is no more. She lives in a former soviet block country.
I think most people who believe in communism are good people. I mean, what would be better if we could all live in this fantasy world where everything is equal and fair? The only problem: It's truly fantasy. And will always be impossible to work in practice.
Though this could just be a fantasy wish of mine in hopes most people have good intentions.
Post automatically merged:
Though this could just be a fantasy wish of mine in hopes most people have good intentions.
Dude, stop. You're so fucking dishonest it's actual weird. I don't romanticize anything, I've never claimed to be a communist nor am I a full fledged socialist. Social Democracy (which is still a capitalist system) is as far as I'm willing to go. You're just an unhinged freak who is a trigger happy nut. I go to Colombia every single year and my entire family lives there. Colombia is and always has been a capitalist and cultural conservative country. You've never been there and have never lived there. MY dad lives there and he is a wealthy man who has private health insurance and conducts his business as a private contractor. What's so socialist about that?
Intelectually dishonest? i'm literally putting down my cards on the table. You are the one that is hiding your sympathy for communism. One day you say that communism is alright,the other day you talk about nordic model and socialism.
As i said before,what needs to happen in Latin America is a social cleanse. Starting with the top of the ladder: politicans that have affiliation with said parties?banned. Those that are corrupt and criminals? Judged and punished according with their crimes. Thing is,lots of these guys commit crimes against humanity with their policies,so they should face life sentence or the noose.
They are useful idiots like Stalin liked to call them. They are being used. They are stupid.
"We will achieve communism by progressivly taxing capitalism"-Marx. Colombia is a bureocratic hell just like Brazil and the rest of Latrin America. I have never been in Russia either,what of it? Good for you and you daddy.I wish prosperity to all of you,but the thing is:most people will not thrive under a severely regulated economy.
https://econamericas.com/2018/09/latin-america-fails-economic-freedom/
As i said before,what needs to happen in Latin America is a social cleanse. Starting with the top of the ladder: politicans that have affiliation with said parties?banned. Those that are corrupt and criminals? Judged and punished according with their crimes. Thing is,lots of these guys commit crimes against humanity with their policies,so they should face life sentence or the noose.
Post automatically merged:
They are useful idiots like Stalin liked to call them. They are being used. They are stupid.
Post automatically merged:
"We will achieve communism by progressivly taxing capitalism"-Marx. Colombia is a bureocratic hell just like Brazil and the rest of Latrin America. I have never been in Russia either,what of it? Good for you and you daddy.I wish prosperity to all of you,but the thing is:most people will not thrive under a severely regulated economy.
https://econamericas.com/2018/09/latin-america-fails-economic-freedom/
Last edited:
I believe in a democratic society where we choose what system we want to have. You clearly don't believe in that and you're willing to cleanse people who don't agree with your views. You're as genocidal as those you claim to despise.
I believe in free speech, and in a free democratic society, you have the right to exercise your free speech and believe in whatever you want.
You are intellectually dishonest when you claim you respect difference in opinion but conveniently change the definition of words to fit your own narrative. You're not very good at it either, it is very transparent. You don't own up to your own shit half the time and engage in behaviors you claim you despise. If you believe communists and socialists should be banned off public life then you are a fascist, or at the very least and ultra rightwing authoritarian who wants the state to control what you can do and advocate for.
I live in a country where nazis have the right to march as long as they're being peaceful about it. And as much as I hate them and find their views abhorrent, it is still the sacrifice you make when living in a free democratic country.
I believe in free speech, and in a free democratic society, you have the right to exercise your free speech and believe in whatever you want.
You are intellectually dishonest when you claim you respect difference in opinion but conveniently change the definition of words to fit your own narrative. You're not very good at it either, it is very transparent. You don't own up to your own shit half the time and engage in behaviors you claim you despise. If you believe communists and socialists should be banned off public life then you are a fascist, or at the very least and ultra rightwing authoritarian who wants the state to control what you can do and advocate for.
I live in a country where nazis have the right to march as long as they're being peaceful about it. And as much as I hate them and find their views abhorrent, it is still the sacrifice you make when living in a free democratic country.
This is about freedom. Latin America is low on economical freedom and the State regulates and sticks its nose in pretty much anything that concerns its citizens individual rights. I don't even see modern day Europe as an example of freedom. I think America is the only free country standing and it seems it might go down as well.
Last edited:
Yeah,i see the democracy the democrats want for Americans. Listen,dude,fuck you. I'm tired of your games. Everyone can claim anything. Politics is about actions. You lefties already showed your true colors long ago. I never claimed i respect differences of opinions,shitty opinions will get no respect from me. That doesn't mean i will make things personal. I'm not the one that goes calling everyone names. I didn't start this shit. You did. If i and some others here are answering you in a very uneducated way,well...its on you. Opinions=ideas. Authoritarian? States were created to provide security. Maintain peace and order basically. Its you guys that want the state to give you free meals and baby sit you and of course this creates an authoritarian monster. We saw how free we all were when covid hit: everyone was put into domestic jail. People were arrested over masks that don't work,lockdowns that didn't work and vaccines that might(or not) have worked. You are the one that should own up to your shit. I have always said that i'm anti-communist. Isn't democracy about freeling expression of opinions too? I think communism/socialism are cancerous and shold be banned. Just like nazism. Its as simple as that. If you don't like it,fine. Don't put words in my mouth.
I wasnt talking exclusively about economical freedom. You literally get fined if you smoke in Singapore. Its a higly intrusive state. I was talking about individual freedoms.
They literally banned religion in the Soviet Union. Its goes beyond economics. Its a very tyranical system that tries to endoctrinate its citizens into accepting SLAVERY. Look how crazy North Korea is.
Post automatically merged:
According to the economic freedom index, America isn't even in the top 20. You're not economically free when student loans and medical debt drags you down.
Post automatically merged:
Post automatically merged:
They literally banned religion in the Soviet Union. Its goes beyond economics. Its a very tyranical system that tries to endoctrinate its citizens into accepting SLAVERY. Look how crazy North Korea is.
Last edited:
And I'm not even using insults, that's how good I am
:cheers:
Not really, but I'm open to discovering new things mate. Sorry, but you are not on the list tho, I will only have that type of fun with decent people.
Funny, I'm not holding one gram of hate against you guys.
Better than you it seems:
"Ideology : The body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group."
A belief is comparable to a value which in return is comparable to an ideology.
This is why where there is no ideology, there is no value. And where there is no value, there is no ethic.
Already did ages ago, long before we even had this debate:
Wikipedia : "In gender studies, the term gender refers to proposed social and cultural constructions of masculinities and femininities"
World Health Organization: "Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time. "
And people ask why I don't consider you a leftist...
Of course, for a bigot, I'm must be a real nightmare. And I don't even do what other woke people tends to do by ignoring you.. So you don't even get that satisfaction ! I wonder if it haunts your sleep sometimes... hehehe
Oh!? So that's what you are trying to do here !? Good job mate. you completely nailed it!
Actually they are.
The radicalization of this movement and its followers is documented and followed by social researchers in both united state and France (didn't checked around Europe, but I'm sure in other countries its also the case). What I experienced is just a group effect that was fulled by the defensor of the rethoric of the rationalist movement and the new atheists and also from people like Dawkins himself.
I was, like him, convinced that Religion was a source of evil and should be rationnalized out of this world. I was, like him, convinced that science was the answer to every problems of society and that we should put scientific reasonning above all else and NEVER politicize science. And like him, I was sure that Islam was a religion of hate (In fact, you can still see a recent post of mine explaining why I have a dangerous bias toward this religion).
Defensors, followers and founder of the new atheists movement and the rationnalist movement put skepticism above everything else. They are mainly the product of hard science discipline which means that they have one BIG blind spot: social sciences. Most of them do not care about social sciences and that's why they are dangerous. This specific blind spot creates a full loads of biases in their reasonning and pushes their scientism toward potential non scientific results.
They are not really dangerous right now. Even if they are sometimes the sources of hatred against some minorities. But some of their followers could very well become dangerous in time if this radicalization and cultist mindset process is not stopped effectively.
That's why I attacked Dawkins and the movement he is a part of. Not simply because I want to attack the man, but because his ideology itself can cause harm to some people. Starting with their own followers.
"Instead, they advocate the antitheist view that the various forms of theism should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics"
What do you call the action of countering religion and beliefs system in structure such as government, education and politics ?
Answer: A political action of reoganisation of society.
Now, that's the "anti religious" side of the movement, but in reality it goes a step further as we saw it in the example of Dawkins's claims about the immorality of not aborting children with Down syndrom. What this case reflects is a bigger vision of society where science and "rationnality" are the primordial factors of domination of the morality of their future societies. I know that not only because its documented by social militants, scientific and journalists but also because this is what followers are talking about when they talk about the future of humanity.
Science as a primodial source of knowledge is good, its actually a good idea to developp the impact of science and rationnality on society. But when this type of "rationnality" becomes the motor of ethic, only chaos can prevail.
sigh
Again, an affirmation without explanation
Donating to anti far right and independant press, sharing the content of minorities, women, scientific and leftist militant and never stop questionning myself about my beliefs. If I can already do those three things properly, I'm doing more that the majority of the population.
I leave the rest to those who can actually move from their houses to act.
Yes because I didn't say that you don't care. I only analysed the behavior of neutrality and its problems. If you feel targeted its not my fault mate.
If there are no divisions in society, why are there very rich people and very poor people ?
You have 3 hours.
Wow I missed that... that would be straight up fascist rethoric for once..
If you say so, it must be true. Everything you say is true, right ?
0. Communism is a systemic vision opposed to Nazism. Your comparison is therefore fallacious and completely ignorant.
1. Communism was never applied. It never existed on planet earth. What existed and still exist are authoritarian regimes that use corrupted visions of communism to maintain power.
2. There is no such thing as communists and socialists status quo. If it was the case, people following those ideologies wouldn't ask for a reformation or a reconstruction or a destruction of the majorities of the capitalist and liberals system and power on planet earth.
3. I'm a few videos and one book close of potentially becoming a communist myself - not saying that I will, just that it is a potentiality. Also, calling for the death of communists would be calling for the death of people that I know and love. Very kind hearthed people who would never hurt a fly.
I purposefully ignored what you just said to Toby to give you one last chance. So... If you don't want me to turn full personal and antifascist berserker on your a*s, be VERY CAREFUL of what you are going to reply to my next question :
Are you advocating for the death of all communists around the world ?
:cheers:
Not really, but I'm open to discovering new things mate. Sorry, but you are not on the list tho, I will only have that type of fun with decent people.
Funny, I'm not holding one gram of hate against you guys.
Better than you it seems:
"Ideology : The body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group."
A belief is comparable to a value which in return is comparable to an ideology.
This is why where there is no ideology, there is no value. And where there is no value, there is no ethic.
Already did ages ago, long before we even had this debate:
Wikipedia : "In gender studies, the term gender refers to proposed social and cultural constructions of masculinities and femininities"
World Health Organization: "Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time. "
And people ask why I don't consider you a leftist...
Of course, for a bigot, I'm must be a real nightmare. And I don't even do what other woke people tends to do by ignoring you.. So you don't even get that satisfaction ! I wonder if it haunts your sleep sometimes... hehehe
Oh!? So that's what you are trying to do here !? Good job mate. you completely nailed it!
Actually they are.
The radicalization of this movement and its followers is documented and followed by social researchers in both united state and France (didn't checked around Europe, but I'm sure in other countries its also the case). What I experienced is just a group effect that was fulled by the defensor of the rethoric of the rationalist movement and the new atheists and also from people like Dawkins himself.
I was, like him, convinced that Religion was a source of evil and should be rationnalized out of this world. I was, like him, convinced that science was the answer to every problems of society and that we should put scientific reasonning above all else and NEVER politicize science. And like him, I was sure that Islam was a religion of hate (In fact, you can still see a recent post of mine explaining why I have a dangerous bias toward this religion).
Defensors, followers and founder of the new atheists movement and the rationnalist movement put skepticism above everything else. They are mainly the product of hard science discipline which means that they have one BIG blind spot: social sciences. Most of them do not care about social sciences and that's why they are dangerous. This specific blind spot creates a full loads of biases in their reasonning and pushes their scientism toward potential non scientific results.
They are not really dangerous right now. Even if they are sometimes the sources of hatred against some minorities. But some of their followers could very well become dangerous in time if this radicalization and cultist mindset process is not stopped effectively.
That's why I attacked Dawkins and the movement he is a part of. Not simply because I want to attack the man, but because his ideology itself can cause harm to some people. Starting with their own followers.
"Instead, they advocate the antitheist view that the various forms of theism should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics"
What do you call the action of countering religion and beliefs system in structure such as government, education and politics ?
Answer: A political action of reoganisation of society.
Now, that's the "anti religious" side of the movement, but in reality it goes a step further as we saw it in the example of Dawkins's claims about the immorality of not aborting children with Down syndrom. What this case reflects is a bigger vision of society where science and "rationnality" are the primordial factors of domination of the morality of their future societies. I know that not only because its documented by social militants, scientific and journalists but also because this is what followers are talking about when they talk about the future of humanity.
Science as a primodial source of knowledge is good, its actually a good idea to developp the impact of science and rationnality on society. But when this type of "rationnality" becomes the motor of ethic, only chaos can prevail.
sigh
Again, an affirmation without explanation
Donating to anti far right and independant press, sharing the content of minorities, women, scientific and leftist militant and never stop questionning myself about my beliefs. If I can already do those three things properly, I'm doing more that the majority of the population.
I leave the rest to those who can actually move from their houses to act.
Yes because I didn't say that you don't care. I only analysed the behavior of neutrality and its problems. If you feel targeted its not my fault mate.
If there are no divisions in society, why are there very rich people and very poor people ?
You have 3 hours.
Wow I missed that... that would be straight up fascist rethoric for once..
If you say so, it must be true. Everything you say is true, right ?
0. Communism is a systemic vision opposed to Nazism. Your comparison is therefore fallacious and completely ignorant.
1. Communism was never applied. It never existed on planet earth. What existed and still exist are authoritarian regimes that use corrupted visions of communism to maintain power.
2. There is no such thing as communists and socialists status quo. If it was the case, people following those ideologies wouldn't ask for a reformation or a reconstruction or a destruction of the majorities of the capitalist and liberals system and power on planet earth.
3. I'm a few videos and one book close of potentially becoming a communist myself - not saying that I will, just that it is a potentiality. Also, calling for the death of communists would be calling for the death of people that I know and love. Very kind hearthed people who would never hurt a fly.
I purposefully ignored what you just said to Toby to give you one last chance. So... If you don't want me to turn full personal and antifascist berserker on your a*s, be VERY CAREFUL of what you are going to reply to my next question :
Are you advocating for the death of all communists around the world ?
"Jail and kill all Nazis". "Hey,he is talking about killing all Germans" No,wrong,Fallacious logic.
You know pretty damn well who i think should get a bullet,its men like: Lula,Fat Kim,Putin,Xi Jiping and intelectuals,rich guys and other high status people that are associated with all the crimes against humanity under communism regimes. The average german citizen in Nazi Germany was not a fucking SS soldier or even a nazi for that matter. I'm not talking about going after common people just because they believe stupid shit. The likes of you,solis and c4n would not be harmed under such cleanse.
Calls my comparison fallacious and completely ignorant. Next says communism was never applied. Classic,C4N. No,i'm not advocating for the deaths of idiots like you. Just the ones that are actually criminals(the ones that used the public machine to do crimes against humanity and take away freedom from citizens). Oh you are going to be mad at me?FUCK YOU AND ALL THAT YOU STAND FOR,YOU CLOWN.GET A FUCKING JOB.NOBODY READS THIS SHIT.YOU ARE NOT DOING JACK SHIT WIT YOUR LIFE.
You know pretty damn well who i think should get a bullet,its men like: Lula,Fat Kim,Putin,Xi Jiping and intelectuals,rich guys and other high status people that are associated with all the crimes against humanity under communism regimes. The average german citizen in Nazi Germany was not a fucking SS soldier or even a nazi for that matter. I'm not talking about going after common people just because they believe stupid shit. The likes of you,solis and c4n would not be harmed under such cleanse.
Post automatically merged:
Calls my comparison fallacious and completely ignorant. Next says communism was never applied. Classic,C4N. No,i'm not advocating for the deaths of idiots like you. Just the ones that are actually criminals(the ones that used the public machine to do crimes against humanity and take away freedom from citizens). Oh you are going to be mad at me?FUCK YOU AND ALL THAT YOU STAND FOR,YOU CLOWN.GET A FUCKING JOB.NOBODY READS THIS SHIT.YOU ARE NOT DOING JACK SHIT WIT YOUR LIFE.
Last edited:
You’re unhinged and genocidal.
My guy, I was defending you from those who would call you the worst user here. I only said you’re conceited cause you are.
Post automatically merged:
And I'm not even using insults, that's how good I am
:cheers:
Not really, but I'm open to discovering new things mate. Sorry, but you are not on the list tho, I will only have that type of fun with decent people.
Funny, I'm not holding one gram of hate against you guys.
Better than you it seems:
"Ideology : The body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group."
A belief is comparable to a value which in return is comparable to an ideology.
This is why where there is no ideology, there is no value. And where there is no value, there is no ethic.
Already did ages ago, long before we even had this debate:
Wikipedia : "In gender studies, the term gender refers to proposed social and cultural constructions of masculinities and femininities"
World Health Organization: "Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time. "
And people ask why I don't consider you a leftist...
Of course, for a bigot, I'm must be a real nightmare. And I don't even do what other woke people tends to do by ignoring you.. So you don't even get that satisfaction ! I wonder if it haunts your sleep sometimes... hehehe
Oh!? So that's what you are trying to do here !? Good job mate. you completely nailed it!
Actually they are.
The radicalization of this movement and its followers is documented and followed by social researchers in both united state and France (didn't checked around Europe, but I'm sure in other countries its also the case). What I experienced is just a group effect that was fulled by the defensor of the rethoric of the rationalist movement and the new atheists and also from people like Dawkins himself.
I was, like him, convinced that Religion was a source of evil and should be rationnalized out of this world. I was, like him, convinced that science was the answer to every problems of society and that we should put scientific reasonning above all else and NEVER politicize science. And like him, I was sure that Islam was a religion of hate (In fact, you can still see a recent post of mine explaining why I have a dangerous bias toward this religion).
Defensors, followers and founder of the new atheists movement and the rationnalist movement put skepticism above everything else. They are mainly the product of hard science discipline which means that they have one BIG blind spot: social sciences. Most of them do not care about social sciences and that's why they are dangerous. This specific blind spot creates a full loads of biases in their reasonning and pushes their scientism toward potential non scientific results.
They are not really dangerous right now. Even if they are sometimes the sources of hatred against some minorities. But some of their followers could very well become dangerous in time if this radicalization and cultist mindset process is not stopped effectively.
That's why I attacked Dawkins and the movement he is a part of. Not simply because I want to attack the man, but because his ideology itself can cause harm to some people. Starting with their own followers.
"Instead, they advocate the antitheist view that the various forms of theism should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics"
What do you call the action of countering religion and beliefs system in structure such as government, education and politics ?
Answer: A political action of reoganisation of society.
Now, that's the "anti religious" side of the movement, but in reality it goes a step further as we saw it in the example of Dawkins's claims about the immorality of not aborting children with Down syndrom. What this case reflects is a bigger vision of society where science and "rationnality" are the primordial factors of domination of the morality of their future societies. I know that not only because its documented by social militants, scientific and journalists but also because this is what followers are talking about when they talk about the future of humanity.
Science as a primodial source of knowledge is good, its actually a good idea to developp the impact of science and rationnality on society. But when this type of "rationnality" becomes the motor of ethic, only chaos can prevail.
sigh
Again, an affirmation without explanation
Donating to anti far right and independant press, sharing the content of minorities, women, scientific and leftist militant and never stop questionning myself about my beliefs. If I can already do those three things properly, I'm doing more that the majority of the population.
I leave the rest to those who can actually move from their houses to act.
Yes because I didn't say that you don't care. I only analysed the behavior of neutrality and its problems. If you feel targeted its not my fault mate.
If there are no divisions in society, why are there very rich people and very poor people ?
You have 3 hours.
Wow I missed that... that would be straight up fascist rethoric for once..
If you say so, it must be true. Everything you say is true, right ?
0. Communism is a systemic vision opposed to Nazism. Your comparison is therefore fallacious and completely ignorant.
1. Communism was never applied. It never existed on planet earth. What existed and still exist are authoritarian regimes that use corrupted visions of communism to maintain power.
2. There is no such thing as communists and socialists status quo. If it was the case, people following those ideologies wouldn't ask for a reformation or a reconstruction or a destruction of the majorities of the capitalist and liberals system and power on planet earth.
3. I'm a few videos and one book close of potentially becoming a communist myself - not saying that I will, just that it is a potentiality. Also, calling for the death of communists would be calling for the death of people that I know and love. Very kind hearthed people who would never hurt a fly.
I purposefully ignored what you just said to Toby to give you one last chance. So... If you don't want me to turn full personal and antifascist berserker on your a*s, be VERY CAREFUL of what you are going to reply to my next question :
Are you advocating for the death of all communists around the world ?
:cheers:
Not really, but I'm open to discovering new things mate. Sorry, but you are not on the list tho, I will only have that type of fun with decent people.
Funny, I'm not holding one gram of hate against you guys.
Better than you it seems:
"Ideology : The body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group."
A belief is comparable to a value which in return is comparable to an ideology.
This is why where there is no ideology, there is no value. And where there is no value, there is no ethic.
Already did ages ago, long before we even had this debate:
Wikipedia : "In gender studies, the term gender refers to proposed social and cultural constructions of masculinities and femininities"
World Health Organization: "Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time. "
And people ask why I don't consider you a leftist...
Of course, for a bigot, I'm must be a real nightmare. And I don't even do what other woke people tends to do by ignoring you.. So you don't even get that satisfaction ! I wonder if it haunts your sleep sometimes... hehehe
Oh!? So that's what you are trying to do here !? Good job mate. you completely nailed it!
Actually they are.
The radicalization of this movement and its followers is documented and followed by social researchers in both united state and France (didn't checked around Europe, but I'm sure in other countries its also the case). What I experienced is just a group effect that was fulled by the defensor of the rethoric of the rationalist movement and the new atheists and also from people like Dawkins himself.
I was, like him, convinced that Religion was a source of evil and should be rationnalized out of this world. I was, like him, convinced that science was the answer to every problems of society and that we should put scientific reasonning above all else and NEVER politicize science. And like him, I was sure that Islam was a religion of hate (In fact, you can still see a recent post of mine explaining why I have a dangerous bias toward this religion).
Defensors, followers and founder of the new atheists movement and the rationnalist movement put skepticism above everything else. They are mainly the product of hard science discipline which means that they have one BIG blind spot: social sciences. Most of them do not care about social sciences and that's why they are dangerous. This specific blind spot creates a full loads of biases in their reasonning and pushes their scientism toward potential non scientific results.
They are not really dangerous right now. Even if they are sometimes the sources of hatred against some minorities. But some of their followers could very well become dangerous in time if this radicalization and cultist mindset process is not stopped effectively.
That's why I attacked Dawkins and the movement he is a part of. Not simply because I want to attack the man, but because his ideology itself can cause harm to some people. Starting with their own followers.
"Instead, they advocate the antitheist view that the various forms of theism should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics"
What do you call the action of countering religion and beliefs system in structure such as government, education and politics ?
Answer: A political action of reoganisation of society.
Now, that's the "anti religious" side of the movement, but in reality it goes a step further as we saw it in the example of Dawkins's claims about the immorality of not aborting children with Down syndrom. What this case reflects is a bigger vision of society where science and "rationnality" are the primordial factors of domination of the morality of their future societies. I know that not only because its documented by social militants, scientific and journalists but also because this is what followers are talking about when they talk about the future of humanity.
Science as a primodial source of knowledge is good, its actually a good idea to developp the impact of science and rationnality on society. But when this type of "rationnality" becomes the motor of ethic, only chaos can prevail.
sigh
Again, an affirmation without explanation
Donating to anti far right and independant press, sharing the content of minorities, women, scientific and leftist militant and never stop questionning myself about my beliefs. If I can already do those three things properly, I'm doing more that the majority of the population.
I leave the rest to those who can actually move from their houses to act.
Yes because I didn't say that you don't care. I only analysed the behavior of neutrality and its problems. If you feel targeted its not my fault mate.
If there are no divisions in society, why are there very rich people and very poor people ?
You have 3 hours.
Wow I missed that... that would be straight up fascist rethoric for once..
If you say so, it must be true. Everything you say is true, right ?
0. Communism is a systemic vision opposed to Nazism. Your comparison is therefore fallacious and completely ignorant.
1. Communism was never applied. It never existed on planet earth. What existed and still exist are authoritarian regimes that use corrupted visions of communism to maintain power.
2. There is no such thing as communists and socialists status quo. If it was the case, people following those ideologies wouldn't ask for a reformation or a reconstruction or a destruction of the majorities of the capitalist and liberals system and power on planet earth.
3. I'm a few videos and one book close of potentially becoming a communist myself - not saying that I will, just that it is a potentiality. Also, calling for the death of communists would be calling for the death of people that I know and love. Very kind hearthed people who would never hurt a fly.
I purposefully ignored what you just said to Toby to give you one last chance. So... If you don't want me to turn full personal and antifascist berserker on your a*s, be VERY CAREFUL of what you are going to reply to my next question :
Are you advocating for the death of all communists around the world ?
I never denied bolsheviks being genocidal,that doesn’t change the fact that you are using words like cleanse. Stop hiding behind the atrocities of a dead empire in order to justify what you want to do.
you can keep pretending I’m a commie, you can keep pretending all communists are militants and murderers, still doesn’t change the fact that you’re an unhinged freak who believes in state violence and censorship. You are a fascist, and I don’t throw that label Willy nilly like c4n.
you can keep pretending I’m a commie, you can keep pretending all communists are militants and murderers, still doesn’t change the fact that you’re an unhinged freak who believes in state violence and censorship. You are a fascist, and I don’t throw that label Willy nilly like c4n.
You are so fucking ignorant that you think those 100 million deaths are about Russia. I'm talking about the killings that happened all over the globe. I already explained what i meant by cleanse. Imagine being pro-armed population,freedom of commerce,miniumum state and so on and being a fascist. FUCK THE LEFT AND ALL THAT YOU GUYS STAND FOR. "Deus,Pátria,Família e Liberdade".
The average communist is a retard that idolizes muderers and thiefs.FODA-SE A ESQUERDA E TUDO O QUE ELA REPRESENTA.
Post automatically merged:
The average communist is a retard that idolizes muderers and thiefs.FODA-SE A ESQUERDA E TUDO O QUE ELA REPRESENTA.
