Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
That's why I really do like candidates that can fund their campaigns with little assistance from donors because when they are funded by big interests, they work for big interests not the people.
[automerge]1708958578[/automerge]
I'm for a voucher program, but I still want the tax dollars to follow the wealthy as well, so it forces these public schools to up their practices and education standards. It doesn't help if they just lose students and not the funds.
[automerge]1708958578[/automerge]
I'm for a voucher program, but I still want the tax dollars to follow the wealthy as well, so it forces these public schools to up their practices and education standards. It doesn't help if they just lose students and not the funds.
Public schools get their money almost entirely from the government. They have small fundraisers the kids do here and there to provide general supplies and for sports teams, but the teachers, programs, etc. are all Govt funded.
[automerge]1708959050[/automerge]
If you want your minds to be blown. Go check out how much of these funds go to administration costs in inner cities and the amount of unaccounted-for funds.
[automerge]1708959050[/automerge]
If you want your minds to be blown. Go check out how much of these funds go to administration costs in inner cities and the amount of unaccounted-for funds.
When that much money is being donated to your cause, chances are those donors probably have deeper, more sophisticated intentions in mind other than generosity. It's worth taking a deeper dive into the effects of these donations as the primary recepients of these donations may be "convinced" to make administrative decisions that may not align with the best interests of the rest of the population within their community/county/state/etc.
We're talking about millions of dollars in utilized funding here, at the very least (tens of millions more likely).
We're talking about millions of dollars in utilized funding here, at the very least (tens of millions more likely).
Everyone to Zemmi rn:
[automerge]1708961261[/automerge]
"I'm free to critique such views. Isn't that your vaunted FREEDOM OF SPEECH, conservatives?! -- W-wait, hold up... did you just say -I'm- WRONG?! You sexist, misogynist, conspiracy peddling, evil piece of shit who is also likely transphobic, ableist and every other bigot under the sun. Fuck you. I'm a good person, but I hope you die." 🤡
[automerge]1708961261[/automerge]
"I'm free to critique such views. Isn't that your vaunted FREEDOM OF SPEECH, conservatives?! -- W-wait, hold up... did you just say -I'm- WRONG?! You sexist, misogynist, conspiracy peddling, evil piece of shit who is also likely transphobic, ableist and every other bigot under the sun. Fuck you. I'm a good person, but I hope you die." 🤡
Last edited:
Not anymore. And no, most of the time, there are no "good reasons".
Wrong. The presence of systemic racism is a scientific consensus.
First, you need to understand that "systemic" don't necessary means Laws or regulations even if in some cases it does.
Second, I'm not a sociologist or anykind of social science researcher, so rather than telling you myself. I'll give you some researches and data reports linked to researchs on the subject:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8688641/
https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/examples-of-systemic-racism/
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/popula...across-multiple-domains-in-the-united-states/
You should have enough here to understand the problem that is systemic racism.
There is indeed different kind of racism. There is mostly interpersonal racism and systemic racism.
But what we need to understand is that racism is always linked to a structural domination process. It therefore exist in reactance (cases of interpersonal racism from people of color) or because its the domination ideology and is systemically integrated into the education (the racism against people of color)
There is not such things as leftist being against freewill... materialist leftist don't believe in free will to begin with.
Oh... the bigots are back....
Yippee !
You ? Calling others "science deniers" ?
Wrong. The presence of systemic racism is a scientific consensus.
First, you need to understand that "systemic" don't necessary means Laws or regulations even if in some cases it does.
Second, I'm not a sociologist or anykind of social science researcher, so rather than telling you myself. I'll give you some researches and data reports linked to researchs on the subject:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8688641/
https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/examples-of-systemic-racism/
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/popula...across-multiple-domains-in-the-united-states/
You should have enough here to understand the problem that is systemic racism.
There is indeed different kind of racism. There is mostly interpersonal racism and systemic racism.
But what we need to understand is that racism is always linked to a structural domination process. It therefore exist in reactance (cases of interpersonal racism from people of color) or because its the domination ideology and is systemically integrated into the education (the racism against people of color)
There is not such things as leftist being against freewill... materialist leftist don't believe in free will to begin with.
Oh... the bigots are back....
Yippee !
You ? Calling others "science deniers" ?
Last edited:
Or create a system where poor people won't be able to put children into school because its too expensive.
Pretty sure that statement right there has convinced me you don't even believe what you say. Considering public education is free and the amount per student especially in these inner cities that have higher budgets from the gov't is more than your run of the mill private education.
Pretty sure that statement right there has convinced me you don't even believe what you say. Considering public education is free and the amount per student especially in these inner cities that have higher budgets from the gov't is more than your run of the mill private education.
