Pictures of terrorists in Moscow are quite interesting. Did they get enough water before the trial ?
Seems like inhumanity is justifying inhumanity now..
:kayneshrug:


parents don't want kids to be introduced to these things when they are 10/11 years old.
THis is why I say its a bit too young. I would like to know the answer and context of the video because there is no much here.


I would be pissed. It's not their place.
You can, its your right, but it doesn't mean it would be legitimate. High schooler are likely to have a big sexual awaekening and relationships so its PRIMORDIAL to give them tools to understand that sex must be :
- Protected
- Done with consent
- Respectfull

Meaning that those persons needs GOOD representation, thus meaning that this literature is ABSOLUTELY needed. Period. You being pissed will not change that data.


I have talked to my children about subjects like this, drugs, alcohol, and violence since they could comprehend it.
Talking about it is not enough. They need representations. And giving them psotive literature is much better than letting them discover it online. Things that they pretty much already did at that age.

I personally think we should eliminate all forms of Porn
:seriously:

Remember when you were talking about the "woke" wanting to take down sexual content.. Well rethink that, its the far right who wants that. Look at this fellow.

It does something to our brains and ruins our ability to have healthy relationships or sexual expectations
Not necessaraly no.


I think many on the woke left are, as you have very evidently showed, degenerate
Dehumanization now..... hm..


You do a lot of that by yourself mate...


then again you called me sexist racist bigot
Again, never did that :kayneshrug: But you and Van loves to lie lol.

On the other hand, you are being sexist right now by bodyshaming a woman, yes. Completely.


and its not even "realistic". the VA she's modeled after is cute lol
And you find her unattractive because.. ?

@Zemmi do you feel like this woman


... is unattractive ? Maybe I'm just blind..

That's one example, but do you have more ?

And hey! Since playing video game with unattractive characters is hard.. I guess you will never play with those characters ?




or does it count only with women ?
Depends on the country. Btw White people can be systemically racist against other white ethnicities.
There is no systemic racism against white in the word. It just does not exist. But indeed, systemic racism includes ALSO racism against other ethnicities considered as racialized (and not white)


Those 5 years were wasted, my dude...
Not at all.


Though they do not hesitate to say that porn is simultaneously exploitative and empowering
Its not porn who is empowering, its the choice of women to do what they want with their body. You get things mixed up as always...

double standards right?:?

they wanna ban anything they deem unfit and add everything they deem fit
No they don't
:lawsigh:
 


... is unattractive ? Maybe I'm just blind..

That's one example, but do you have more ?

And hey! Since playing video game with unattractive characters is hard.. I guess you will never play with those characters ?




or does it count only with women ?
In GTA the joke is that Trevor is a lunatic, and most people actually prefer Franklin and Michael over him. Actually, every GTA protagonist aside from Trevor is conventionally attractive, even the newest one which is a woman lmao. So you used a horrible example there

Also if that guy is a character from the latest street fighter you do realize the most popular characters in that franchise are conventionally attractive ones right?

You used two examples of cartoonishly ugly characters. If you want to introduce character models like that as some sort of comedy by all means go ahead
 

AL sama

Red Haired
Seems like inhumanity is justifying inhumanity now..
:kayneshrug:



THis is why I say its a bit too young. I would like to know the answer and context of the video because there is no much here.



You can, its your right, but it doesn't mean it would be legitimate. High schooler are likely to have a big sexual awaekening and relationships so its PRIMORDIAL to give them tools to understand that sex must be :
- Protected
- Done with consent
- Respectfull

Meaning that those persons needs GOOD representation, thus meaning that this literature is ABSOLUTELY needed. Period. You being pissed will not change that data.



Talking about it is not enough. They need representations. And giving them psotive literature is much better than letting them discover it online. Things that they pretty much already did at that age.


:seriously:

Remember when you were talking about the "woke" wanting to take down sexual content.. Well rethink that, its the far right who wants that. Look at this fellow.


Not necessaraly no.



Dehumanization now..... hm..



You do a lot of that by yourself mate...



Again, never did that :kayneshrug: But you and Van loves to lie lol.

On the other hand, you are being sexist right now by bodyshaming a woman, yes. Completely.



And you find her unattractive because.. ?

@Zemmi do you feel like this woman


... is unattractive ? Maybe I'm just blind..

That's one example, but do you have more ?

And hey! Since playing video game with unattractive characters is hard.. I guess you will never play with those characters ?




or does it count only with women ?

There is no systemic racism against white in the word. It just does not exist. But indeed, systemic racism includes ALSO racism against other ethnicities considered as racialized (and not white)



Not at all.



Its not porn who is empowering, its the choice of women to do what they want with their body. You get things mixed up as always...


No they don't
:lawsigh:
:gokulaugh::gokulaugh:
 
Remember when you were talking about the "woke" wanting to take down sexual content.. Well rethink that, its the far right who wants that. Look at this fellow.


Not necessaraly no.



Dehumanization now..... hm..
Dehumanization; no. But I'll call a spade and spade. The modern day left are obsessed with sex to a vile degree - think Vaush, the literal pedophile-defender.

I would like Porn eliminated, yes, but not for the destruction of freedom. I genuinely believe porn impacts our brains. I'd like more research into this and, hopefully, illustrations of the dangers and public awareness.

Just because I want porn gone, does not mean that I think it's something that would work.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
Seems like inhumanity is justifying inhumanity now..
:kayneshrug:



THis is why I say its a bit too young. I would like to know the answer and context of the video because there is no much here.



You can, its your right, but it doesn't mean it would be legitimate. High schooler are likely to have a big sexual awaekening and relationships so its PRIMORDIAL to give them tools to understand that sex must be :
- Protected
- Done with consent
- Respectfull

Meaning that those persons needs GOOD representation, thus meaning that this literature is ABSOLUTELY needed. Period. You being pissed will not change that data.



Talking about it is not enough. They need representations. And giving them psotive literature is much better than letting them discover it online. Things that they pretty much already did at that age.


:seriously:

Remember when you were talking about the "woke" wanting to take down sexual content.. Well rethink that, its the far right who wants that. Look at this fellow.


Not necessaraly no.



Dehumanization now..... hm..



You do a lot of that by yourself mate...



Again, never did that :kayneshrug: But you and Van loves to lie lol.

On the other hand, you are being sexist right now by bodyshaming a woman, yes. Completely.



And you find her unattractive because.. ?

@Zemmi do you feel like this woman


... is unattractive ? Maybe I'm just blind..

That's one example, but do you have more ?

And hey! Since playing video game with unattractive characters is hard.. I guess you will never play with those characters ?




or does it count only with women ?

There is no systemic racism against white in the word. It just does not exist. But indeed, systemic racism includes ALSO racism against other ethnicities considered as racialized (and not white)



Not at all.



Its not porn who is empowering, its the choice of women to do what they want with their body. You get things mixed up as always...


No they don't
:lawsigh:
What does that even mean do I feel like that woman? lol. No
 
Seems like inhumanity is justifying inhumanity now..
:kayneshrug:



THis is why I say its a bit too young. I would like to know the answer and context of the video because there is no much here.



You can, its your right, but it doesn't mean it would be legitimate. High schooler are likely to have a big sexual awaekening and relationships so its PRIMORDIAL to give them tools to understand that sex must be :
- Protected
- Done with consent
- Respectfull

Meaning that those persons needs GOOD representation, thus meaning that this literature is ABSOLUTELY needed. Period. You being pissed will not change that data.



Talking about it is not enough. They need representations. And giving them psotive literature is much better than letting them discover it online. Things that they pretty much already did at that age.


:seriously:

Remember when you were talking about the "woke" wanting to take down sexual content.. Well rethink that, its the far right who wants that. Look at this fellow.


Not necessaraly no.



Dehumanization now..... hm..



You do a lot of that by yourself mate...



Again, never did that :kayneshrug: But you and Van loves to lie lol.

On the other hand, you are being sexist right now by bodyshaming a woman, yes. Completely.



And you find her unattractive because.. ?

@Zemmi do you feel like this woman


... is unattractive ? Maybe I'm just blind..

That's one example, but do you have more ?

And hey! Since playing video game with unattractive characters is hard.. I guess you will never play with those characters ?




or does it count only with women ?

There is no systemic racism against white in the word. It just does not exist. But indeed, systemic racism includes ALSO racism against other ethnicities considered as racialized (and not white)



Not at all.



Its not porn who is empowering, its the choice of women to do what they want with their body. You get things mixed up as always...


No they don't
:lawsigh:
I'm not sure what this conversation is about exactly but
I don't see anything empowering about pornography
It can make people think that women are just objects to please you, when they are so much more than that.
Porn can rot the brain too. One of those things that, in moderation, is okay, but too much is arguably deadly.
 
I'm not sure what this conversation is about exactly but
I don't see anything empowering about pornography
It can make people think that women are just objects to please you, when they are so much more than that.
Porn can rot the brain too. One of those things that, in moderation, is okay, but too much is arguably deadly.
My guy... :myman:

I think wokeism and the modern day culture isn't healthy for men or women. I know many women who did not feel liberated by hook-up culture. In fact, they felt OBLIGATED to put out in this shit social economy.
 
My guy... :myman:

I think wokeism and the modern day culture isn't healthy for men or women. I know many women who did not feel liberated by hook-up culture. In fact, they felt OBLIGATED to put out in this shit social economy.
Porn isn't a real job
Isn't a real career
These women need to do something that lets them keep their dignity and also gets them enough dough to survive
 
Logiko is well aware of my feelings on issues :milaugh:Which are usually against what he thinks.
No....

He's a feminist.

And a good person...

He studied for 5 years for this stuff (through online articles). But VAN could do it in 1 year.

Respect him because he's a good person.

He tells us such all the time....

You need to know about systematic racism... and liberal theory....

You're just a bad person if you disagree with him (especially when you don't validate him for being a good person).
 
what we consider pretty/beautiful can change to an extent over time but not fully so both of you are right
I mean I literally said this earlier lol
lmao no. Somethings change over time but pretty faces remain universal
Yes some details change but drop a beautiful woman from today in the 1400s and she will be gathering attraction no matter what the standard is.
 
I mean I literally said this earlier lol


Yes some details change but drop a beautiful woman from today in the 1400s and she will be gathering attraction no matter what the standard is.
Tbf though a lot can change in centuries
Like I'm watching a video that isn't particularly about this topic but it had a good point in that the early 2000's were a time where skinny = beautiful but now we're open to girls being a bit caked up and caked out
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
No....

He's a feminist.

And a good person...

He studied for 5 years for this stuff (through online articles). But VAN could do it in 1 year.

Respect him because he's a good person.

He tells us such all the time....
I'm anti the American type of feminism.

He keeps saying if I was in his place, I'd agree with him. But if he was in mine, without a doubt he would change a lot of his opinions if he had my real life experiences.
 
Porn isn't a real job
Isn't a real career
These women need to do something that lets them keep their dignity and also gets them enough dough to survive
"Be a housewife."
Them: "OMG I'M NOT GOING TO BE A SLAVE TO A MAN."

"Be a wageslave."
Them: "YES. I'M SO AUTONOMOUS AND HAPPY."

All jokes aside - I do actually believe it is a man's duty to provide for his family. My wife, for example doesn't have to work, but I have no issue with her doing so if she wants to. In return, she actively looks after me and the things I need.
 
Top