Uncle Van

Bullets don't hurt. But Taxes do.
Let's be honest here: most people judge intellectual dishonesty by whether they agree with you or not(like most things). They've already got their assumption down as a fact, so denying their "facts" is dishonesty to them.
 
Let's be honest here: most people judge intellectual dishonesty by whether they agree with you or not(like most things). They've already got their assumption down as a fact, so denying their "facts" is dishonesty to them.
Not entirely. I think many can respect that someone, through their own perspectives and experiences, can come to wildly different conclusions on how things should work. Intellectual dishonesty is not about disagreement, but a doggedness to 'win-the-point' through subversive tactics.

For example, I think many people here are wrong, but I don't think they're being intellectually dishonest. In fact, I tend to think most of them are well-meaning individuals who aren't jaded through many negative life experiences, and probably have a more open heart than I and thus do not distrust as highly as I do.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
Not entirely. I think many can respect that someone, through their own perspectives and experiences, can come to wildly different conclusions on how things should work. Intellectual dishonesty is not about disagreement, but a doggedness to 'win-the-point' through subversive tactics.

For example, I think many people here are wrong, but I don't think they're being intellectually dishonest. In fact, I tend to think most of them are well-meaning individuals who aren't jaded through many negative life experiences, and probably have a more open heart than I and thus do not distrust as highly as I do.
I tend to believe people honestly believe what they say and some people, I know this to be true, because if they didn't the idea is so insane, they wouldn't have said it unless they were convinced.

*cough cough* The brilliant defund the police idea.
 
I tend to believe people honestly believe what they say and some people, I know this to be true, because if they didn't the idea is so insane, they wouldn't have said it unless they were convinced.

*cough cough* The brilliant defund the police idea.
Pretty much, Zemmi. Most people honestly believe it, and I think a lot of the time it comes from a place of care and conviction. That does not means they're intellectually dishonest.

Defunding the police is... clever... yes... :josad:
 

Uncle Van

Bullets don't hurt. But Taxes do.
Not entirely. I think many can respect that someone, through their own perspectives and experiences, can come to wildly different conclusions on how things should work. Intellectual dishonesty is not about disagreement, but a doggedness to 'win-the-point' through subversive tactics.

For example, I think many people here are wrong, but I don't think they're being intellectually dishonest. In fact, I tend to think most of them are well-meaning individuals who aren't jaded through many negative life experiences, and probably have a more open heart than I and thus do not distrust as highly as I do.
Yeah but people don't use it correctly though. Like with throwing political terms they don't understand as an insult, they'll scream dishonesty from a disagreement.

I don’t necessarily distrust people, but too many people uses their own opinions as a basis for right and wrong, and do everything they can to position themselves as the good person.
 
Yeah but people don't use it correctly though. Like with throwing political terms they don't understand as an insult, they'll scream dishonesty from a disagreement.

I don’t necessarily distrust people, but too many people uses their own opinions as a basis for right and wrong, and do everything they can to position themselves as the good person.
Everyone wants to be a 'good person' or the 'good guy'. I think right and wrong formed via opinions is basically the foundation behind "morality is relative".

No, I think there are some clear acts that are immoral - unprovoked, intentional murder, for one. Yet other acts are murky and hard to ascribe morality to.

However, trying to attain the position of 'the good guy' in all situations, never taking an opinion that is outside of what an pure idealist would believe is something done by the insecure who are seeking validation - or a manipulator of the highest degree - just my take, no proof really.

People throwing political terms as an insult is weapon of choice for faux intellectuals (and extreme adherents to certain political philosophies ofc).

Without going into anything personal, I have had to learn to trust that people aren't operating in bad faith, but my first instinct is to think that the majority are, and that they only want to win rather than convince others. I have, however, come to learn that some people really are that idealistic...
 
Did you question whether or not the Americas were stolen?
Yes. Im not big on inherent claim to land. By that logic all of Europe was stolen from other ethnic groups and you don’t see them bitching

and what I said is 100% true. America was a largely uninhabited land by the time the colonies were being established. The natives were mostly killed off by disease way before this land was established
 

Peroroncino

🅷🅰🅻🅰 🅼🅰🅳🆁🅸🅳
so Israel bombing a freaking kitchen where all they did was feed victims and they bombed it with precision bombs meaning it was completely intentional am i right?
Killed people from America,UK,Poland,France and even Australia too.
:sanmoji:
 

Uncle Van

Bullets don't hurt. But Taxes do.
Everyone wants to be a 'good person' or the 'good guy'. I think right and wrong formed via opinions is basically the foundation behind "morality is relative".

No, I think there are some clear acts that are immoral - unprovoked, intentional murder, for one. Yet other acts are murky and hard to ascribe morality to.

However, trying to attain the position of 'the good guy' in all situations, never taking an opinion that is outside of what an pure idealist would believe is something done by the insecure who are seeking validation - or a manipulator of the highest degree - just my take, no proof really.

People throwing political terms as an insult is weapon of choice for faux intellectuals (and extreme adherents to certain political philosophies ofc).

Without going into anything personal, I have had to learn to trust that people aren't operating in bad faith, but my first instinct is to think that the majority are, and that they only want to win rather than convince others. I have, however, come to learn that some people really are that idealistic...
If I give my full opinion on human beings in general, it would be very cynical and depressing lol
 
Yes. Im not big on inherent claim to land. By that logic all of Europe was stolen from other ethnic groups and you don’t see them bitching

and what I said is 100% true. America was a largely uninhabited land by the time the colonies were being established. The natives were mostly killed off by disease way before this land was established
Fuck. You're in your early 20s, right?
 
Top