[FNZ] Super Role Madness Pokemon Chose your own starters

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am required to assume that the host is either giving a giant middle finger to the scum
This is horseshit btw. I cleared a player, that player got modkilled, I got no refunds. Yo‘s results were wrong, we have no clue what his actual results were. No fucking idea why you call it a middle finger. So far the scum team only benefitted from host decisions.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
"Unkillable" in this instance means night kill. You can play around bulletproof scum just fine. Scum can't really play around invincible townies.

But hey, I got a different idea. Let's take your completely unbiased assessment at face value that this all well and checks out

If I am required to assume that the host is either giving a giant middle finger to the scum, might as well throw away any assumptions involving the host making fair and equitable decisions in terms of game solving. Agreed?
Not agreed, because your premise is wholly flawed. Prof having an ability that lets him change alignment from Day 5, while swingy, is not "giving scum the giant middle finger". What has happened here, is that Prof used that ability to become a Guardian Angel, and used it on me. Surmised thus, it's a Townie using his ability to benefit another townie. What you keep missing here, is that this whole Guardian Angel thing is the compromise for Scum - otherwise, Prof would know who scum is (or at least some of them) due to Fuji's mistake and then win the game for town through it. That doesn't mean you need to feed into the delusion you love to espouse about the game being rigged for certain players the host favours, it means that mistakes happen and this was determined to be the best way to mitigate their effect.

You're doing this a lot. You're loading your positions based on conspiracies you feed to yourself, and then you're asking me to respond as if your conspiracies are proven truth. And it's even sillier, because you're doing this against a *presumption* that Prof can protect me against super kills. You don't have the information to hand, so it's silly for you to act like you have a fully-informed position on this instead of accepting that your point of view is, perhaps, less valuable than people who are better at speculating on this sort of thing.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
Tell me without a hint of irony, if you were scum at this point in the game and the host just announced "Sorry Ratchet is invincible because I fucked up" lol
Like where is this coming from? When did Fuji announce this? You're getting on a moral highground over something you have absolutely no idea about. What do you know about the likelihood of a GA being able to block super kills? Nothing?
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
And frankly I'm expected to believe here that either Town Ultra is so far into his tunnel he refuses to see what even scum can't pretend isn't present, or Scum Ultra is throwing around appeals to emotion over perceived slights that he hasn't even verified. Which is more likely? For as much as he cries about "unfair treatment", nobody else in this game could get away with this and not be significantly challenged for his behaviour.
 
This is horseshit btw. I cleared a player, that player got modkilled, I got no refunds. Yo‘s results were wrong, we have no clue what his actual results were. No fucking idea why you call it a middle finger. So far the scum team only benefitted from host decisions.
Talking to you is such a chore sometimes, you bring up shit of no relevance to evidence your point because you wanna be right

The fact is Ratchet is the strongest player in the game. You would ragequit as scum if the host made him immune to superkills on a whim. I've seen you complain for far less, get the fuck out of here
 
I'm not saying for a fact what is being reported can't explicitly happen either, considering Fuji, again, does what he likes, but this is just a web of silly nonsense assumptions and I think it's very cringe you seem to enjoy playing this game through solving by angleshooting what the host does/doesn't do. Even if you happen to be correct, which I don't think is 100% the case here
 
Prof saw something on the Reloaded flip WU he wasn’t supposed to. Usually you‘d modkill in this case, or replace the player, but there are no subs. Now if the compensation was to give scum another member it would just be ass. Like, at least modkill that slot, then, before throwing more stones into Town‘s way.
 
And frankly I'm expected to believe here that either Town Ultra is so far into his tunnel he refuses to see what even scum can't pretend isn't present, or Scum Ultra is throwing around appeals to emotion over perceived slights that he hasn't even verified. Which is more likely? For as much as he cries about "unfair treatment", nobody else in this game could get away with this and not be significantly challenged for his behaviour.
you could for starters
 
Like where is this coming from? When did Fuji announce this? You're getting on a moral highground over something you have absolutely no idea about. What do you know about the likelihood of a GA being able to block super kills? Nothing?
Flower is relying entirely on castles made out of air, she's not even really playing mafia at this point, you're only endorsing it because it conveniences you.

I'm trying to resort to convincing her that by her own assumptions there shouldn't be any reason why you are immune to superkills in the event that we decide to get rid of you but she's being dumb
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
you could for starters
Ultra, without treading up old ground, you've used a word this game that, when I used it off-site in similar context, I had a significant amount of the section demand I fuck off and never come back. If I won as scum appealing to emotions and ranting about the host, several players (they know who they are) would be spending post game lambasting it. They would not do the same if you won. Already, I already know at least three players are going to tell me how shit I was regardless of whether I lead to a winning PoE or not. I don't actually have this diplomatic immunity that gets assumed.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
Flower is relying entirely on castles made out of air, she's not even really playing mafia at this point, you're only endorsing it because it conveniences you.

I'm trying to resort to convincing her that by her own assumptions there shouldn't be any reason why you are immune to superkills in the event that we decide to get rid of you but she's being dumb
I'm not endorsing it though - I said that you're both wasting your time. You wouldn't remove me before Prof because if I'm town you lose two votes instead of one.
 
Ultra, without treading up old ground, you've used a word this game that, when I used it off-site in similar context, I had a significant amount of the section demand I fuck off and never come back. If I won as scum appealing to emotions and ranting about the host, several players (they know who they are) would be spending post game lambasting it. They would not do the same if you won. Already, I already know at least three players are going to tell me how shit I was regardless of whether I lead to a winning PoE or not. I don't actually have this diplomatic immunity that gets assumed.
well I'm not talking about the townies you killed giving you shit post game I'm talking in the context of currently alive players who would literally let you get away with anything
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top