H

Herrera95

Most industrialized countries have such a Pyramid scheme (Germany, Japan, France ...) only exception I know is Israel with a high birth rate. US population growth is driven by immigration as their birth rate is below replacement. Interesting Brazil got old before it got wealthy, similar to China and North Korea. Is that also the case for Argentina?

I guess population growth and decline are exponential processes like f(x) = 2^x for growing population or f(x) = 2^(-x) for shrinking population -- and humans are bad understanding non linear things. Which makes it very hard to balance between the two kind of Pyramid schemes: Exponential growth/decline.
Not sure about Argentina but things are much more complicated than simply birth rate and population charts. No one can prevent a disaster like the pandemic that we had for example. And then there is wars and other natural or human made disasters that influence on that. Also immigration (legal or not) can play a huge role in a country populaton size.

South Korea and Japan are low crime, high safety societies but still have very low birth rates smh. Meanwhile the unsafe poor countries at (civil) war have the high birth rates (Syria, Myanmar, Iraq etc.) ... why? Maybe because logic and education destroy birth rates?
Like I said it is what I believe would HELP and are all of those things. Of course we know poor people have a lot of babies because they are careless and don't use condoms or other methods to avoid that, they may receive some governament benefit for having a baby while being poor (at least here in Brazil this is a case) and there is also some studies that suggest people in an unsafe environment tend to have more babies since they know many could die but at least increases the chances of at least one of them to carry on their genes and to keep humankind alive.

Those topics are much more complex than think one simple cause and one simple solution would be the answer.
 
H

Herrera95

The fact he won primaries is absurd
[automerge]1718658438[/automerge]
I don't know about sexy
[automerge]1718658579[/automerge]
I also agree that Thanos was right
I also believed that but right now I'm not so sure. Technology advances is what allow us to keep growing in population. And big states is what prevent us to grow even more. Mars becoming a farm for Earth may be reality in a not so distant future.
[automerge]1718658793[/automerge]
(ethnic Karen who are christians)
What
[automerge]1718658842[/automerge]
This place is so stupid my braincells want to commit suicide :lawsigh:
They were never alive to commit suicide in first place
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is nature dude. A fucking paper isn't saying when a woman is ready for adult life. Nature will say.
Unless the paper actually researches the nature to make that assessment?!

Or what is your assessment of sexual maturity in humans?
[automerge]1718703249[/automerge]
You don't even know what that word means. Even less NAMELESS
Pedophile = person who is sexually attracted to prebubescent individuals.
[automerge]1718703347[/automerge]
If anybody was ever catch you trying to get with a 16 yo in public you'd get jumped, and rightfully so
Sure but i think that would be called ephebophile
 
H

Herrera95

Just because you like to make up your own definitions doesn't mean you're not what we're accusing you of.

This is how you know how much of a social reject you truly are. If anybody was ever catch you trying to get with a 16 yo in public you'd get jumped, and rightfully so.
Is not my own definition. Is THE definition. Again you don't even know what you are talking about. You are not prepared for this debate dude.

And no dude. Here in Brazil we have a very smart thing in law called age of consent so I can have relationship with anyone over 13 (not included) years old.
[automerge]1718727530[/automerge]
I literally googled that shit and saw pics. If the police raid my house,i will tell them about you.
You only saw cartoon so you are fine.
[automerge]1718727973[/automerge]
Unless the paper actually researches the nature to make that assessment?!

Or what is your assessment of sexual maturity in humans?
No it didn't. Turning 18 years old don't magically makes you "available" for sex in nature. Everyone has their own time and it is way earlier. You know pretty well that teenagers are fucking with each other in much younger ages. The paper is just to blame the 18+ who wants to have sex with 18- which is fucking ridiculous since 2 people with 17 would also be considered as pedophiles to each other following the paper "logic".

Pedophile = person who is sexually attracted to prebubescent individuals.
Pre-pubescent and that means people younger than 12 years old. So no one is a pedophile by wanting to dating anyone from 13 and above. There are other names for those people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What career? Drug dealer?
Stop digging my old posts, fucking stalker.
[automerge]1718728127[/automerge]
Is not my own definition. Is THE definition. Again you don't even know what you are talking about. You are not prepared for this debate dude.

And no dude. Here in Brazil we have a very smart thing in law called age of consent so I can have relationship with anyone over 13 (not included) years old.
[automerge]1718727530[/automerge]

You only saw cartoon so you are fine.
[automerge]1718727973[/automerge]

No it didn't. Turning 18 years old don't magically makes you "available" for sex in nature. Everyone has their own time and it is way earlier. You know pretty well that teenagers are fucking with each other in much younger ages. The paper is just to blame the 18+ who wants to have sex with 18- which is fucking ridiculous since 2 people with 17 would also be considered as pedophiles to each other following the paper "logic".


Pre-pubescent and that means people younger than 12 years old. So no one is a pedophile by wanting to dating anyone from 13 and above. There are other names for those people.
man,shut the fuck up. you are disgusting.
 
Top