Aside from that. What I say doesn't require big knowledge.
Unless you have good feminist, anti-validist, anti-capitalist, anti-racist and anti-fascist reasons to go against your gov. I don't see how targetting leftists will make your somehow someone with more progressist values mate.
You are on the right side by defaut against leftists. (unless you are even more leftist than them, and its possible, I do not know just how radical they really are)
Aside from that. What I say doesn't require big knowledge.
Unless you have good feminist, anti-validist, anti-capitalist, anti-racist and anti-fascist reasons to go against your gov. I don't see how targetting leftists will make your somehow someone with more progressist values mate.
You are on the right side by defaut against leftists. (unless you are even more leftist than them, and its possible, I do not know just how radical they really are)
That's a lot of "unless" after I specifically said "I'd appreciate" you didn't make uninformed comments. And here I am, expected to respect every bullshit that you spout about women.
Of course, it's a very progressist government with many ideas and proclamations you'd love.
Please, keep your assumption in mind: "you're against your government and it happens to be leftist, that must mean that you're against progress and you're confusing government with institution".
So, what do I have against my government? What bigoted ideas do I have against them? Off the top of my head...
- Going against the Constitution.
- Giving amnesty to far-right criminals (and some random vandals) to stay in power.
- Making pacts with literal past terrorists to stay in power.
- Making anti-socialist concessions like allowing the richest region to keep all its taxes for itself to stay in power.
- Gift them the railway system as well, while you're at it, that'll keep you in power.
- Of course, they mentioned nothing of the above when they ran for the presidency. Of course they have also been lying non-stop about their intentions until the last moment while steadily going on with it.
- Now the president's wife is on trial because of how being his wife made some really big corporations gift her very expensive pieces of software and contacts that helped build a very big business that she would have never had without his influence (I believe this would translate to English as "influence peddling").
- Of course, every leftist media is framing this as a "right-side witch hunt", because how dare we put the president on trial for anything, even with the proof being public.
- We also have the past vice-president on record talking about how the president offered to introduce him to some judges so he could avoid a little bit of trouble he found himself in.
- Creating laws "for the women" that are clearly anti-men and yet they actually served to put condemned rapists easier back on the streets because of loopholes they introduced.
- Creating services "to protect women" that are now proven bullshit that did nothing but serve to enrich themselves.
- I won't get started on the criminal rates shooting up from completely unrestricted immigration.
This is the pseudo-moderate left. Our radical left, which is also in a position of power and built a career on being so anti-power and anti-institution as you are, is defending the dictator Maduro from Venezuela and accusing dissidents of being "like Trump supporters". And so is another of our moderate leftists ex-presidents. Certainly has nothing to do with owning enterprises (both him and his daughters) on said country.
I bet "Venezuela isn't real communism"? They just rigged an election in the most obvious way to stay in power (for the 11th year) and both him and our far left are claiming anyone who doubts the government's words on his validity is a bigot and anti-democratic. After all, the party going against his dictatorship is right-side. Not to mention he literally threatened with a "river of blood" if he wasn't elected. Pretty unncessary of him since he was going to rig it, but that's just the way he is.
So I can say I check several of your "unless".
You were clearly biased by reading it's a leftists government, because "left is good". "I don't see how targetting leftists will make your somehow someone with more progressist values mate". Must be nice being you, so much black and white, such first wold issues. You're funny, like always.
You can throw the word "progress" around believing every change is always good, but it's not. Some are.
Now, go back to your thread. Or be a smartass again, up to you.
It never stopped though it'll probably be slightly quieter since Carrot4Nakama got temporarily thread banned. He's donned the anarchist colours to rally the supposed left wing denizens of Worst Gen to his cause of annoying the mods for some no doubt inane purpose. I don't know if he'll have that many people in his DM club. Not necessarily due to a lack of self identified left wingers mind you but due to a lack of left wingers that live up to C4N's standards of what a left winger should supposedly be.
That's a lot of "unless" after I specifically said "I'd appreciate" you didn't make uninformed comments. And here I am, expected to respect every bullshit that you spout about women.
Of course, it's a very progressist government with many ideas and proclamations you'd love.
Please, keep your assumption in mind: "you're against your government and it happens to be leftist, that must mean that you're against progress and you're confusing government with institution".
So, what do I have against my government? What bigoted ideas do I have against them? Off the top of my head...
- Going against the Constitution.
- Giving amnesty to far-right criminals (and some random vandals) to stay in power.
- Making pacts with literal past terrorists to stay in power.
- Making anti-socialist concessions like allowing the richest region to keep all its taxes for itself to stay in power.
- Gift them the railway system as well, while you're at it, that'll keep you in power.
- Of course, they mentioned nothing of the above when they ran for the presidency. Of course they have also been lying non-stop about their intentions until the last moment while steadily going on with it.
- Now the president's wife is on trial because of how being his wife made some really big corporations gift her very expensive pieces of software and contacts that helped build a very big business that she would have never had without his influence (I believe this would translate to English as "influence peddling").
- Of course, every leftist media is framing this as a "right-side witch hunt", because how dare we put the president on trial for anything, even with the proof being public.
- We also have the past vice-president on record talking about how the president offered to introduce him to some judges so he could avoid a little bit of trouble he found himself in.
- Creating laws "for the women" that are clearly anti-men and yet they actually served to put condemned rapists easier back on the streets because of loopholes they introduced.
- Creating services "to protect women" that are now proven bullshit that did nothing but serve to enrich themselves.
- I won't get started on the criminal rates shooting up from completely unrestricted immigration.
This is the pseudo-moderate left. Our radical left, which is also in a position of power and built a career on being so anti-power and anti-institution as you are, is defending the dictator Maduro from Venezuela and accusing dissidents of being "like Trump supporters". And so is another of our moderate leftists ex-presidents. Certainly has nothing to do with owning enterprises (both him and his daughters) on said country.
I bet "Venezuela isn't real communism"? They just rigged an election in the most obvious way to stay in power (for the 11th year) and both him and our far left are claiming anyone who doubts the government's words on his validity is a bigot and anti-democratic. After all, the party going against his dictatorship is right-side. Not to mention he literally threatened with a "river of blood" if he wasn't elected. Pretty unncessary of him since he was going to rig it, but that's just the way he is.
So I can say I check several of your "unless".
You were clearly biased by reading it's a leftists government, because "left is good". "I don't see how targetting leftists will make your somehow someone with more progressist values mate". Must be nice being you, so much black and white, such first wold issues. You're funny, like always.
You can throw the word "progress" around believing every change is always good, but it's not. Some are.
Now, go back to your thread. Or be a smartass again, up to you.
Venezuela is a mess, man. This guy said to me the FUCKING URSS was not communist. He believes that communism is heaven on earth, so all this bloody dictatorships are fake communist regimes and not what Marx called for(delusion i know).
He believes that communism is heaven on earth, so all this bloody dictatorships are fake communist regimes and not what Marx called for(delusion i know).
That sounds pretty humorous since dictatorshipof the proletariat isn't exactly a subtle part of Marxist philosophy.
The main critique of the anarchists against communism was that once a dictatorship of the proletariat was established, it would never progress beyond that stage. 100 years of red revolutions later hasn't proven the anarchists wrong yet on that front.
Venezuela is a mess, man. This guy said to me the FUCKING URSS was not communist. He believes that communism is heaven on earth, so all this bloody dictatorships are fake communist regimes and not what Marx called for(delusion i know).
You, Toby, Zenos, Van, Herrera, Bob, Tejas, etc... are legends. I told you I was happy your ban was over cause it was gonna get popping here again.
But let's be honest, Logiko is the main character of this thread. His posting stamina arguing with everyone simultaneously is what makes this thread the gold mine it is
I just know the guy would have called my communist grandfather and my anarchist father right wingers cause of differences in social values.
That sounds pretty humorous since dictatorshipof the proletariat isn't exactly a subtle part of Marxist philosophy.
The main critique of the anarchists against communism was that once a dictatorship of the proletariat was established, it would never progress beyond that stage. 100 years of red revolutions later hasn't proven the anarchists wrong yet on that front.
You, Toby, Zenos, Van, Herrera, Bob, Tejas, etc... are legends. I told you I was happy your ban was over cause it was gonna get popping here again.
But let's be honest, Logiko is the main character of this thread. His posting stamina arguing with everyone simultaneously is what makes this thread the gold mine it is
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.