it literally does. Once again explain why the same attacks did nothing to Kaido. Why did Kaido use the word sworskills when the scabbards used ryuo which is Armament haki?
if that was the case Oda wouldn't have specified Mihawk to just sword skill, he wouldn't have made Kaido say haki transcends all, he would've made him say swordsmanship transcends all
It literally does, Oda clearly used the same word for both instance, Oden swordskills that cut Kaido were thanks to his haki + physical + two of the 21 great graded swords
Wrong, scabbard-oden comparison is invalid because Scabbards don't have conquerors so they're both completely different attacks. Scabbards is related to sword skill solely. Doesn't matter both are 2 different attacks.
They are the same attack, are you gonna tell me that Zoro Shishi Sonson during his fight with Mr1 isn't the same attack as he used in Egghead?
Black blades don't mean squat for anybody except swordsmen presumably because swordsmen (only Zoro, Mihawk, Ryuma) are fodder without it whilst hakimen don't rely on their swords and could pick up a twig and keep on fighting if needed. Also Oden died before Mihawk got his title so doesn't matter either way.
Zoro hasn't even achieved a black blade yet he so far defeated two YC1, the second one being mid diff while he still hasn't blackened any of his 3 swords.
Sanji doesnt really get Ws so they have to cling to stuff like arc MVP to try and get one and the shanks fandom were supporting them on that but it's like all of a sudden they all did a 180 and are now slandering sanji
Sanji doesnt really get Ws so they have to cling to stuff like arc MVP to try and get one and the shanks fandom were supporting them on that but it's like all of a sudden they all did a 180 and are now slandering sanji
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.