Questions & Mysteries What Grade is Ryokugyu's Black blade?
- Thread starter Sir Tuna Sandwich II
- Start date
This is what a wooden bokken looks like
And why the fuck would GB coat a sword he isn't even using or touching in haki, let alone it's wooden scabbard?
It's a fucking kokuto lol
And why the fuck would GB coat a sword he isn't even using or touching in haki, let alone it's wooden scabbard?
It's a fucking kokuto lol
We literally see the sword is touching his body.
The entire argument for people to believe GB has a black blade requires people to ignore the fact we did not see most of the battle and he was actively using blackened haki at the time. That's not a strong argument at all.
please show the panel
And why is he coating a sword he ain't using at that moment?
The entire argument for people to believe GB doesn't have a black blade requires people to ignore the fact that he wasn't using his sword AT ALL in his fight against fodder and the sword wasn't even touching him. That's not a strong argument at all.
And why is he coating a sword he ain't using at that moment?
The entire argument for people to believe GB doesn't have a black blade requires people to ignore the fact that he wasn't using his sword AT ALL in his fight against fodder and the sword wasn't even touching him. That's not a strong argument at all.
Here is GB using blackened haki and his sword touching his body.
Why is he using blackened haki here? Because you just finished fighting. Stop making things more difficult than they need to be. But go ahead and tell me that scene doesn't exist.
You think you have this solid argument while in reality this is a very weak argument. It requires people to ignore the fact he was using blackened haki and just finished fighting in a battle we didn't see. We only saw the very end.
What happened here and how long were they fighting for?
Nobody knows.
You claiming GB never used this swords doesn't make it true. We can't even say that's the sword and not a wooden bokken made from his own DF power.
Stop coping and bring facts.
Stop telling me to ignore the fact GB was using blacken haki in battle we only saw the end of. If your argument requires me to ignore that information you have a weak argument.
Why is he using blackened haki here? Because you just finished fighting. Stop making things more difficult than they need to be. But go ahead and tell me that scene doesn't exist.
You think you have this solid argument while in reality this is a very weak argument. It requires people to ignore the fact he was using blackened haki and just finished fighting in a battle we didn't see. We only saw the very end.
What happened here and how long were they fighting for?
Nobody knows.
You claiming GB never used this swords doesn't make it true. We can't even say that's the sword and not a wooden bokken made from his own DF power.
Post automatically merged:
Stop coping and bring facts.
Stop telling me to ignore the fact GB was using blacken haki in battle we only saw the end of. If your argument requires me to ignore that information you have a weak argument.
Last edited:
Here is GB using blackened haki and his sword touching his body.
He's literally still dealing with king and queen there. He's just started to pierce king. He ain't using his sword AT ALL lol
Cause he doesn't need to against fodder like king and queen
And your argument involves people having to ignore the fact that he blackened a sword he wasn't even using...
why the fuck would oda just not show him using the sword if he wanted to make sure that he was using it?
You're head canon needs us to think so convolutedly to explain why oda would make his sword black even tho he wasn't using it at all lol
Here's GB way after the negging of king and queen, and the sword still is black...
What happened here and how long were they fighting for?
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
And the fact that queen is in the process of getting slim and king is just getting pierced. So GB just started fucking them up at that point. there was no fight.
Until shown otherwise, he didn't. It wasn't even implied at all. They don't have any cuts or shit like that that would tell us he used his sword. Claiming he did is like the literal definition of head canon lol.
We can. Because we already know how a wooden bokken looks like. It is not shaded black at all
This is a bokken
GB has a kokuto. you claiming he doesn't have it doesn't make it true.
That literally just goes under his belt and over his pants lol
He's literally still dealing with king and queen there. He's just started to pierce king. He ain't using his sword AT ALL lol
Cause he doesn't need to against fodder like king and queen
And your argument involves people having to ignore the fact that he blackened a sword he wasn't even using...
why the fuck would oda just not show him using the sword if he wanted to make sure that he was using it?
You're head canon needs us to think so convolutedly to explain why oda would make his sword black even tho he wasn't using it at all lol
Here's GB way after the negging of king and queen, and the sword still is black...
We can easily deduce it from the fact that GB says king and queen are fodder to him.
And the fact that queen is in the process of getting slim and king is just getting pierced. So GB just started fucking them up at that point. there was no fight.
Until shown otherwise, he didn't. It wasn't even implied at all. They don't have any cuts or shit like that that would tell us he used his sword. Claiming he did is like the literal definition of head canon lol.
We can. Because we already know how a wooden bokken looks like. It is not shaded black at all
This is a bokken
GB has a kokuto. you claiming he doesn't have it doesn't make it true.
He's literally still dealing with king and queen there. He's just started to pierce king. He ain't using his sword AT ALL lol
Cause he doesn't need to against fodder like king and queen
And your argument involves people having to ignore the fact that he blackened a sword he wasn't even using...
why the fuck would oda just not show him using the sword if he wanted to make sure that he was using it?
You're head canon needs us to think so convolutedly to explain why oda would make his sword black even tho he wasn't using it at all lol
Here's GB way after the negging of king and queen, and the sword still is black...
We can easily deduce it from the fact that GB says king and queen are fodder to him.
And the fact that queen is in the process of getting slim and king is just getting pierced. So GB just started fucking them up at that point. there was no fight.
Until shown otherwise, he didn't. It wasn't even implied at all. They don't have any cuts or shit like that that would tell us he used his sword. Claiming he did is like the literal definition of head canon lol.
We can. Because we already know how a wooden bokken looks like. It is not shaded black at all
This is a bokken
GB has a kokuto. you claiming he doesn't have it doesn't make it true.
You still haven't proved any facts. Claiming what a character did or didn't do off scene doesn't make it true.
Yes, the final argument. The sword in the shadow of the coat scene.
We can't even see the entire sword in that scene, only see half of the sword. Going by that scene the sword is not as long as we thought and GB extended it for the battle because it made out of wood. There goes your argument.
If you require people to grab a microscope to see it's a black blade, it's not a black blade. If Oden wanted us to know it was a black blade he wouldn't make it difficult.