I'm not sure you can have 2 sign up threads up and running. I think last time I tried to post a sign up thread it was locked for that reason but don't know if that's changed. Would make sense to be able to do it as it might take a while, and way better to already have the sign ups up and ready so when the previous game ends can just run it
Are you going next, or is it after? Given the size of the game, it might make sense to put it up, just make sure it's very clear in the sign up page that your game is running after the game currently in signups. So that players who sign up know not to expect it to start the moment it fills.
Generally, I'm not too keen on doing this, but I'll see how it works in this case with the game size being what it is. Probably only as a one off exception here too, don't really want to see a bunch of sign ups with no games running.
Generally, I'm not too keen on doing this, but I'll see how it works in this case with the game size being what it is. Probably only as a one off exception here too, don't really want to see a bunch of sign ups with no games running.
As I saw some discussion on it - light games would count towards bans, Turbos would not. What do need to address though, is attempting to "game the system" is only going to result in me having to give bans in X Months rather than X Games. I decided to go for X Games because it felt a bit fairer, but that comes with the trust that this will be respected. I don't ban players lightly. To see open collusion around undermining the ban here is more than a little disappointing. So, while it doesn't affect any current bans, in future bans will be given in months. Minimum 2.
This ban shouldn't exist in the first place. At least not without certain others getting banned in addition. This is the strictest punishment which has ever been dished out on this website other than the perma of Midnight and Beta and meanwhile nothing is done about people like Muugen who are toxic towards other players and they get away with everything. Thank you so much for supporting that toxicity and basically telling them they can continue treating me like crap.
It makes me legit depressed and makes me feel like utter crap.
It makes me legit depressed and makes me feel like utter crap.
btw @Ratchet could a light game be run in these few days, while Fuji's game fills up?
very small game, it's not about Flower's ban, just wanted something going on these 3 days
I would even consider hosting it myself, a super light game, tip my toes in the water as a host
could do 12 hour phases and the lowest number of players possible, to make sure it ends fast
honestly, could even be a turbo, that way it makes sure it's not bypass of Flower's ban
would prob need a co-host to make sure i'm doing it right, since i never did it
very small game, it's not about Flower's ban, just wanted something going on these 3 days
I would even consider hosting it myself, a super light game, tip my toes in the water as a host
could do 12 hour phases and the lowest number of players possible, to make sure it ends fast
honestly, could even be a turbo, that way it makes sure it's not bypass of Flower's ban
would prob need a co-host to make sure i'm doing it right, since i never did it
Not on the fly - that's what the queue is for. If Fuji's game takes a while to fill, then you could potentially go while that gets filled. But in that case, Ariess wouldn't be able to put his sign ups up. So for this time I would say no, but if you'd like to host put a message in the queue thread. We can revisit this in a week or so if Fuji's game hasn't filled.
Flower i approve of @AL sama advice
Not that I don't want to see you play but in general terms it's not healthy for you.
Just think that in 6 months from now you'll not spend a single second caring about the present situation
It's all relative
Not that I don't want to see you play but in general terms it's not healthy for you.
Just think that in 6 months from now you'll not spend a single second caring about the present situation
It's all relative