Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
No. You are underestimating the problem. While yes, we won't have massive tsunami in the near future, the problem created by climate change will be dramatic. And not for the reason than you think.
If you thought that immigration is a problem now, you have no idea of what is to come for ex.
You do know that people are still getting Covid and there are reason to think Covid can have long time lasting dramatic impacts on health, right ?
People are still getting in hospital to this day mate. Without lockdown, the number of death would have been cataclysmic. It's time you start REALLY paying attention to the scientific method mate.
You mean .. like going to work in a factory for nothing while people like you are defending the system and saying that wealth or poverty are due to behaviors and not structural and material conditions ?
Yeah.. sure, talk about slavery while defending people like Elon who make you think that you can become rich by working more.
If you thought that immigration is a problem now, you have no idea of what is to come for ex.
You do know that people are still getting Covid and there are reason to think Covid can have long time lasting dramatic impacts on health, right ?
People are still getting in hospital to this day mate. Without lockdown, the number of death would have been cataclysmic. It's time you start REALLY paying attention to the scientific method mate.
You mean .. like going to work in a factory for nothing while people like you are defending the system and saying that wealth or poverty are due to behaviors and not structural and material conditions ?
Yeah.. sure, talk about slavery while defending people like Elon who make you think that you can become rich by working more.
2-There was no proper lockdown in Brazil(cause people needed to work) and the actual death % was like 1% or something.
3-Dude, you live off the system. You literally do not work. The economy is run by small and middle sized business. Billionaires are only but a fraction. Create a small business before coming up with excuses to steal off people's money so you can live from welfare.
[automerge]1728670549[/automerge]
yeah...NO!
https://brusselssignal.eu/2023/12/german-fairy-tale-forest-to-be-felled-for-wind-turbines/
[automerge]1728670720[/automerge]
@Adam 🍎 and here too
https://qz.com/1389135/germany-is-razing-a-12000-year-old-forest-to-expand-a-coal-mine
Lets explore the resources we need, but lets not be hypocrites. Whenever a third world country mines something, the ecoterrorists start their propaganda war machine to make us look like savages,meanwhile...
[automerge]1728670857[/automerge]
by the likes of you?hell nah
Last edited:
Lawl, that's what you think
https://dialogue.earth/en/climate/3...peratures,the Pacific and Atlantic coastlines.
There are chances that you might have to move in the next two decade due to either economical or environemental peril.
Good luck with your non existent threat mate :)
No. There was no proper lockdown because you had a far right president that completely ignored the warnings of scientists and specialist on the subject. And 1% is still dramatic.
See.. you prove my point.
You talk about slavery, but you justify a system that is close for a majority of people.
(and I can live because of taxes, rich people pay less taxes than others where I live, so it's not the rich, but those who have less that allow me to live ;) )
[automerge]1728671471[/automerge]
Indeed. That might be the reason why you don't see the problems in front of you eyes.
https://dialogue.earth/en/climate/3...peratures,the Pacific and Atlantic coastlines.
There are chances that you might have to move in the next two decade due to either economical or environemental peril.
Good luck with your non existent threat mate :)
No. There was no proper lockdown because you had a far right president that completely ignored the warnings of scientists and specialist on the subject. And 1% is still dramatic.
See.. you prove my point.
You talk about slavery, but you justify a system that is close for a majority of people.
(and I can live because of taxes, rich people pay less taxes than others where I live, so it's not the rich, but those who have less that allow me to live ;) )
[automerge]1728671471[/automerge]
Indeed. That might be the reason why you don't see the problems in front of you eyes.
1-Portugal was bitching about Brazilians migrating there, now its about PAKIS AND INDIANS. Nobody want to migrate into the third world.
2-There was a lockdown. People didn't comply. You have no idea whatsoever about how Brazil works.
3-Imagine bragging about living off taxes from poor people. DISGUSTING. How about getting to work and stop abusing welfare. You have a lot of energy to text. Find a job that that fits you.
4-Nobody takes you seriously. I'm not going to be the first. Don't give two shits about what you think. I reply for entertainment mostly.
2-There was a lockdown. People didn't comply. You have no idea whatsoever about how Brazil works.
3-Imagine bragging about living off taxes from poor people. DISGUSTING. How about getting to work and stop abusing welfare. You have a lot of energy to text. Find a job that that fits you.
4-Nobody takes you seriously. I'm not going to be the first. Don't give two shits about what you think. I reply for entertainment mostly.
Last edited:
Stop China's Smog!
Kek
Tbh I haven't really weighed in on The Environmental stuff. I'm fine with people looking into alternatives but if they can't match and go further and better overall then tough shit.
I've heard climate change is the cause, or it's the effect of..., it's also a cycle...
Either way can't go wrong with studying more before making a concrete answer...
Kek
Tbh I haven't really weighed in on The Environmental stuff. I'm fine with people looking into alternatives but if they can't match and go further and better overall then tough shit.
I've heard climate change is the cause, or it's the effect of..., it's also a cycle...
Either way can't go wrong with studying more before making a concrete answer...
Never that it would be in that direction
Sometime, when it's a mjor emergency, complying is a necessity mate.
I have no reason to be ashamed of my living. My rights are the result of decades of battles for people in my condition. Do not think for one second that I will shame those people by not being proud of their hard work.
Your ideology is so disgusting that you think that I should be ashamed and beg pardon or the knee for being able to live on a right that I have where I live.
When you expect people in difficult situation to give you the thumb up for just paying your due to society and thank you for simply being able to benefit a right that they have. This shows just how little you are considerate of them.
You do not seem to care about people in difficulty, you laugh at them, dehumanize them, ignore their words or lives (you once again for the X time told me to find a job when I already explained multiple time how I'm physically incapable of that) and subject them to your meritocratic vision.
So when you make big talk about slavery .. really, you are not credible one second.
Sometime, when it's a mjor emergency, complying is a necessity mate.
I have no reason to be ashamed of my living. My rights are the result of decades of battles for people in my condition. Do not think for one second that I will shame those people by not being proud of their hard work.
Your ideology is so disgusting that you think that I should be ashamed and beg pardon or the knee for being able to live on a right that I have where I live.
When you expect people in difficult situation to give you the thumb up for just paying your due to society and thank you for simply being able to benefit a right that they have. This shows just how little you are considerate of them.
You do not seem to care about people in difficulty, you laugh at them, dehumanize them, ignore their words or lives (you once again for the X time told me to find a job when I already explained multiple time how I'm physically incapable of that) and subject them to your meritocratic vision.
So when you make big talk about slavery .. really, you are not credible one second.
I think you can be in some way an anarchist and a marxist, but I'm not very educated on that to be honest so I can be wrong.
For now, I lean more toward Marxism and communism. I would love to be an anarchist, but I don't think it's possible for people to auto-organize without a proper political education, so anarchism seems to be difficult to accomplish on first hand.
BUT.. in the end, after a period of transition (call it communism or something else) I think we should be able end up in an anarchic society. But this will take a lot of time.
For the moment, in Marxism, I think I'm leaning toward Troskism. Troskism talks about a perpetual revolution. What I know about leninism or maoism is that those branch have too much blindspots, I don't see how those can work without a form of repression and I'm against that.
I don't know about dengism, this is actually the first time I see this word lol
For now, I lean more toward Marxism and communism. I would love to be an anarchist, but I don't think it's possible for people to auto-organize without a proper political education, so anarchism seems to be difficult to accomplish on first hand.
BUT.. in the end, after a period of transition (call it communism or something else) I think we should be able end up in an anarchic society. But this will take a lot of time.
For the moment, in Marxism, I think I'm leaning toward Troskism. Troskism talks about a perpetual revolution. What I know about leninism or maoism is that those branch have too much blindspots, I don't see how those can work without a form of repression and I'm against that.
I don't know about dengism, this is actually the first time I see this word lol
You do realize that by saying this, your stance equates to the middle, working, and the lower class needing to pay up more despite the everlooming possibility job cuts (tech and working sectors particualry) and increases in the price of almost everything we buy nowadays just so you can shitpost in this thread 24/7?
Meanwhile the homeless and the veterans....
+ the migrants that come and work hard in order to make life work for their families (the ones that do).
Meanwhile the homeless and the veterans....
+ the migrants that come and work hard in order to make life work for their families (the ones that do).
Or before posting, you just try to understand what I say ?
I'm saying here that since rich are not paying what they should, it's the working and the middle class that play the role.
I'm denouncing here the rethoric of people like Nameless who use people in less priviledges to attack other people with even less priviledge / hide behind small business owners and less priviledge people to question my rights with the excuse that those people are paying when he completely ignores the fact that that rich people are paying nothing or close to nothing. And also completely ignoring that taxes also comes from people who willingly support this health care system.
The point is that rich people should pay more and that people like Nameless should stop finding bad excuses to defend an unjust exploitative system and have big talk about slavery.
I'm saying here that since rich are not paying what they should, it's the working and the middle class that play the role.
I'm denouncing here the rethoric of people like Nameless who use people in less priviledges to attack other people with even less priviledge / hide behind small business owners and less priviledge people to question my rights with the excuse that those people are paying when he completely ignores the fact that that rich people are paying nothing or close to nothing. And also completely ignoring that taxes also comes from people who willingly support this health care system.
The point is that rich people should pay more and that people like Nameless should stop finding bad excuses to defend an unjust exploitative system and have big talk about slavery.
Oh alrighty, dengism reffers to the reforms that Deng Xiaoping made in the CCP after Mao's passing away, so people who support modern day China are dengists,
Personally I lean almost entirely towards anarcho-communism when it comes to socialism, but that's not to say that I support socialism, I don't think I have learned enough political theory to decide what to support yet, but it is to say that I preffer anarcho-communism out of all proposed roads to socialism,
Would you like me to recommend some vixeos you can check out about these topics?,
And also maybe you can add some youtube channels to the leftist library too, and the anarchist lobrary website, the libcom website, and the mises institute website, the mises institute isn't leftist but you could add it just to give more context about economics and right-wing political theory,
Edit: Also about what you said of being both an anarchist and a marxist, that I don't think you can be, in the traditional way of using the word marxist, because marxism sees a state as the way to communism, which anarchism sees building up worker democracy and prefiguring a communist society, building the new in the shell of the old, then doing a revolution and then living statelessly with that worker self-management, as the way to communism, at least anarcho-communism does, but a lot of anarchists also agree on a lot with Marx, and with other marxists, and also with some parts of maoism, although with maoism it seen like the character of the state was the reason that those transformstions of society couldn't take place, same with leninism and with marxism, and Zoe Baker is a popular anarcho-communist youtuber who talks a lot about Marx too, and she actually spoke about why the idea of socialism being a period of transition to communism is a leninist invention, and not Marx's intention in his writings, she wrote it as both an article and a video, if you would like to check it out, here is this article:
https://anarchozoe.com/2018/05/03/maoist-rebel-news-does-not-understand-marx/
And here is the video:
It has to do with what I mentioned of building the new in the shell of the old, and prefiguring what you want to see in society,
If you would like to see an anarchist answer to Engels' writing On Authority, meant to be a response to anarchists' objection to the use of unjustified authority, reffering to political authority, here are two videos of it:
This one is a response to a youtuber named Second Thought's video
and this one is a response specificslly to Engels' writing:
You can find Engels' writing here if you want to read it as you watch the video:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm
And here is a writing by Petr Kropotkin about the usual anarcho-communist perspective on authority:
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-are-we-good-enough
=],
[automerge]1728733854[/automerge]
Personally I lean almost entirely towards anarcho-communism when it comes to socialism, but that's not to say that I support socialism, I don't think I have learned enough political theory to decide what to support yet, but it is to say that I preffer anarcho-communism out of all proposed roads to socialism,
Would you like me to recommend some vixeos you can check out about these topics?,
And also maybe you can add some youtube channels to the leftist library too, and the anarchist lobrary website, the libcom website, and the mises institute website, the mises institute isn't leftist but you could add it just to give more context about economics and right-wing political theory,
Edit: Also about what you said of being both an anarchist and a marxist, that I don't think you can be, in the traditional way of using the word marxist, because marxism sees a state as the way to communism, which anarchism sees building up worker democracy and prefiguring a communist society, building the new in the shell of the old, then doing a revolution and then living statelessly with that worker self-management, as the way to communism, at least anarcho-communism does, but a lot of anarchists also agree on a lot with Marx, and with other marxists, and also with some parts of maoism, although with maoism it seen like the character of the state was the reason that those transformstions of society couldn't take place, same with leninism and with marxism, and Zoe Baker is a popular anarcho-communist youtuber who talks a lot about Marx too, and she actually spoke about why the idea of socialism being a period of transition to communism is a leninist invention, and not Marx's intention in his writings, she wrote it as both an article and a video, if you would like to check it out, here is this article:
https://anarchozoe.com/2018/05/03/maoist-rebel-news-does-not-understand-marx/
And here is the video:
It has to do with what I mentioned of building the new in the shell of the old, and prefiguring what you want to see in society,
If you would like to see an anarchist answer to Engels' writing On Authority, meant to be a response to anarchists' objection to the use of unjustified authority, reffering to political authority, here are two videos of it:
This one is a response to a youtuber named Second Thought's video
and this one is a response specificslly to Engels' writing:
You can find Engels' writing here if you want to read it as you watch the video:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm
And here is a writing by Petr Kropotkin about the usual anarcho-communist perspective on authority:
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-are-we-good-enough
=],
[automerge]1728733854[/automerge]
Last edited:
