Gambit vs Reborn:
Gambit's case is weak. He's hinting that Reborn is SK because he was leading the game, as TAC and Drag were, and only he is not dead. Everybody here is not dead, and everybody here has different play styles that aren't always about taking leadership. It's not a good enough argument.
Beta vs. Reborn:
Beta's vote does seem opportunistic. That Sera vs Reborn fight was very flashy. Looking back, he also voted for him day 2.
I don't like the way Reborn is behaving so unsightly to the point he wants to dictate Town 'it's either me or Sera this dayphase, there will be no other option'.
It speaks like Sera touched some nerve and I can relate more with his logic then not honestly.
At first however my mind was set to conceive that Reborn was acting like his usual self asking questions and stuff, despite some logical fallacies concerning the AL argument and the matter regarding TAC's interactions, however this infantry behaviour isn't very town Reborn like.
I will still keep my eye on Natalija but this guy has been very bad this phase.
Unvote
Vote Lynch Reborn
I think it's pretty obvious Reborn completely tunnel visioned on Sera. He took the time to build reads on 4 other players, each had their own individual case, he worked extremely hard day 2 proving his points and his vote just ends on Sera. He lost his cool. Gambit also lost his cool and I made notice of it to beta.
I sorrowfully lack insight on Gambit's meta. However unlike Reborn he didn't try to dictate Town whom to vote for and going from Reborn's meta I don't recall him ever doing something so appalling.
My first thought was that Seraphoenix was touching a nerve and Reborn had become as a consequence salty all of a sudden.
Then he reiterated such behaviour towards me, furthering my thought that something was off with the man.
If we leave the meta argument out of this since no one really knows Gambit's, then you also originally thought he was really salty. You voted for him because of that. It looks opportunistic, you even said his reactions are appalling and simply abnormal. I definitely think they're abnormal too.
Now day 3 you explain basically that, when it became about you, you decided something was off and you kept the vote.
I wonder... if you found Gambit day 1 to be really salty and voted for him and he came after you in particular for being opportunistic, would you also keep your vote on him the next day? You have no knowledge of his meta, so I'm really curious about you answering this question.
Next I'll be looking at Yo vs Gambit.