Status
Not open for further replies.
Who says they don't have any plot relevance though?
Gunko quite literally asked Shamrock if he was going to visit Harald's grave a few chapter ago.
What business do the Holy Knights and Shamrock have with Harald's grave if they have no relation to the plot?
The fact that Haralad had some business with them don't make them central.

This is typical Oda deflection. Loki is a red-herring and so is the lighting strike that caused fire this chapter.
From the moment I saw Loki and his interaction with Luffy, I already knew there was more to him than is being presented to us.
As I already said, not only this is wrog at this point (Loki has the Power considered the most dangerous for Erbaf), but more so:

Some people here are acting like we have never had villains that were a little more than cartoonish, evil two dimensional psycopaths.

Loki Is a Katakuri: he'll have a history and a more complex past. He won't be a two dimensional all-evil monster like Saturn for example, but he Is clearly the main threat, like Katakuri was.

Franouske's already said all there is to say about this
That's why I replayed to him, point for point.

Luffy isn't really treating Loki as an enemy so he likely isn't one and hell
For example this, which is not the case.

Moroever beating Loki is not really gonna move anything plot-wise, we'd just be back to square one. All that would've changed is that Luffy nilly willy wrecked Elbaf for absolutely no reason.
That's like sayin beating Katakuri didn't move anything plot-wise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top