Powers & Abilities Conqueror's Haki is not part of Swordsmanship
- Thread starter Jack D. Jobber
- Start date
There should be a thread where people post the most embarrassing Mihawk/Zoro copes throughout the years.
The worst one for me might be the bullshit about having an emotional connection to your sword is what turns it black, and people like Roger don't have one because they just "picked a random unranked sword off the ground to fight with" because they're not actual swordsmen.
Funny enough this one gained traction not long before the info about "Roger's beloved sword Ace" dropped lmao.
The worst one for me might be the bullshit about having an emotional connection to your sword is what turns it black, and people like Roger don't have one because they just "picked a random unranked sword off the ground to fight with" because they're not actual swordsmen.
Funny enough this one gained traction not long before the info about "Roger's beloved sword Ace" dropped lmao.
ZKK clown still crying.
Thats why Roger wasn't WGS and Alber explained the difference but your ZKK IQ don't understand the difference.
Who said Daishinkan makes WGS you coward? I said Zolo used ''named'' attack without Haki proves swordsmanship skill is the no.1 aspect not Haki.
Roger wasn't WGS so Haki isn't involved your Luffy underling Zolo isn't strong as you believe, so stop crying all the time LMAO.
You gonna run again like ZKK.
Shanks > Mihawk is obvious only ZKK IQ has problem to not understand that just like you didn't understand Shanks wasn't fodder while being apprentice.
Honestly, its too bad you don't realize how crazy you are when you said ''Zolo was a top tier when he left Mihawk island''
Right now LA01 also same level as you as he still runs his mouth about Shanks when he thought apprentice Shanks was fodder, as bad as thinking Gaban is a background character.
You ZKKfans are forever liars and jokes.
Thats why Roger wasn't WGS and Alber explained the difference but your ZKK IQ don't understand the difference.
Who said Daishinkan makes WGS you coward? I said Zolo used ''named'' attack without Haki proves swordsmanship skill is the no.1 aspect not Haki.
Roger wasn't WGS so Haki isn't involved your Luffy underling Zolo isn't strong as you believe, so stop crying all the time LMAO.
You gonna run again like ZKK.
Shanks > Mihawk is obvious only ZKK IQ has problem to not understand that just like you didn't understand Shanks wasn't fodder while being apprentice.
People are cooking Erkek left and right and the boy thinks he is winning... 
Right now LA01 also same level as you as he still runs his mouth about Shanks when he thought apprentice Shanks was fodder, as bad as thinking Gaban is a background character.
You ZKKfans are forever liars and jokes.
Haki is a part of swordsmanship which is why Mihawk said Zoro should clad his blade in Haki, because a nick on a blade is a disgrace to a swordsman. Mihawk spent 2 years training Zoro to use Haki because it's required.
Enma was also unleashing Zoro's Haki, so it is definitely a requirement to be the strongest swordsman.
Using a blade isn't what makes one a pure Swordsman as King said, it's having a Swordmanship style that makes one a pure Swordsman. King said he will bite and do anything required to win whereas a Swordsman will solely rely on Swordsmanship to win battles.
Zoro is a pure Swordsman, King uses a Sword but admits he's not a pure Swordsman, so I'd assume Roger is like King, most pirates like Whitebeard are like king, they'll use anything to win a battle, but a pure Swordsman is dedicated to solely using their Sword to prove their swordsmanship.
Conqueror's Haki is basically a better form of Armament Haki, it makes attacks stronger, both offensively and defensively, so it's undeniably a requirement. If you can't us Conqueror's Haki, it's impossible to be the WGS.
If Mihawk couldn't defeat Shanks or compete with Shanks' techniques like Kamusari which is Conqueror's Haki based, he couldn't be the WGS. It'd be impossible since he duelled with Shanks in order to be known as the WGS.
Enma was also unleashing Zoro's Haki, so it is definitely a requirement to be the strongest swordsman.
Using a blade isn't what makes one a pure Swordsman as King said, it's having a Swordmanship style that makes one a pure Swordsman. King said he will bite and do anything required to win whereas a Swordsman will solely rely on Swordsmanship to win battles.
Zoro is a pure Swordsman, King uses a Sword but admits he's not a pure Swordsman, so I'd assume Roger is like King, most pirates like Whitebeard are like king, they'll use anything to win a battle, but a pure Swordsman is dedicated to solely using their Sword to prove their swordsmanship.
Conqueror's Haki is basically a better form of Armament Haki, it makes attacks stronger, both offensively and defensively, so it's undeniably a requirement. If you can't us Conqueror's Haki, it's impossible to be the WGS.
If Mihawk couldn't defeat Shanks or compete with Shanks' techniques like Kamusari which is Conqueror's Haki based, he couldn't be the WGS. It'd be impossible since he duelled with Shanks in order to be known as the WGS.
ZKK clown still crying.
Thats why Roger wasn't WGS and Alber explained the difference but your ZKK IQ don't understand the difference.
Who said Daishinkan makes WGS you coward? I said Zolo used ''named'' attack without Haki proves swordsmanship skill is the no.1 aspect not Haki.
Roger wasn't WGS so Haki isn't involved your Luffy underling Zolo isn't strong as you believe, so stop crying all the time LMAO.
You gonna run again like ZKK.
Shanks > Mihawk is obvious only ZKK IQ has problem to not understand that just like you didn't understand Shanks wasn't fodder while being apprentice.
Honestly, its too bad you don't realize how crazy you are when you said ''Zolo was a top tier when he left Mihawk island''
Right now LA01 also same level as you as he still runs his mouth about Shanks when he thought apprentice Shanks was fodder, as bad as thinking Gaban is a background character.
You ZKKfans are forever liars and jokes.
Thats why Roger wasn't WGS and Alber explained the difference but your ZKK IQ don't understand the difference.
Who said Daishinkan makes WGS you coward? I said Zolo used ''named'' attack without Haki proves swordsmanship skill is the no.1 aspect not Haki.
Roger wasn't WGS so Haki isn't involved your Luffy underling Zolo isn't strong as you believe, so stop crying all the time LMAO.
You gonna run again like ZKK.
Shanks > Mihawk is obvious only ZKK IQ has problem to not understand that just like you didn't understand Shanks wasn't fodder while being apprentice.
Honestly, its too bad you don't realize how crazy you are when you said ''Zolo was a top tier when he left Mihawk island''
Right now LA01 also same level as you as he still runs his mouth about Shanks when he thought apprentice Shanks was fodder, as bad as thinking Gaban is a background character.
You ZKKfans are forever liars and jokes.
Not the point.
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
No one cares how Zolo beats Mihawk.
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
Wdym no one cares?
Can he beat mihawk without haki? Stop ducking
Can he beat mihawk without haki? Stop ducking
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
Not the point.
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
No one cares how Zolo beats Mihawk.
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
No one cares how Zolo beats Mihawk.
Swordsman can be swordsman without Haki.
But Haki users can't be swordsman without sword skill.
Roger wasn't WGS for a reason.
We are talking about being wss which you need stronger haki than mihawk to be
As Shanks with acoc divine departure like Rogers couldn't beat mihawk
Zolo didn't even beat Lucci with Haki difference, he beat him with 3rd sword SKILL difference. Of course it will be same vs Mihawk, he will win with SKILL difference.
Shanks and Roger beats Mihawk with Haki difference so they can't be WGS, thats why Brannew talked about sword skill not Haki while Kaido hyped Roger Haki not sword skill.
Shanks and Roger beats Mihawk with Haki difference so they can't be WGS, thats why Brannew talked about sword skill not Haki while Kaido hyped Roger Haki not sword skill.
ZKKliar Zolo still had Haki with 2 swords what are you talking about 
Ryuma or Mihawk don't even need 2 swords, 1 sword is enough.
Zolo needing 3rd sword to win is PURELY SKILL difference, otherwise 2 swords would be enough to overpower Lucci with Haki only.
Debunked.
Shanks doesn't cut his opponent, Mihawk can't do shit if he doesn't cut his weakest attacks are non-cutting attacks he couldn't even hurt fodder Buggy since all he does is cutting LMAO.
Debunked once again.
Ryuma or Mihawk don't even need 2 swords, 1 sword is enough.Zolo needing 3rd sword to win is PURELY SKILL difference, otherwise 2 swords would be enough to overpower Lucci with Haki only.
Debunked.
Shanks doesn't cut his opponent, Mihawk can't do shit if he doesn't cut his weakest attacks are non-cutting attacks he couldn't even hurt fodder Buggy since all he does is cutting LMAO.
Debunked once again.