Zoro and Sanji fight the two strongest subordinate period, which are Demon Dorry and Broggy and for sure not the Holy letdowns that Old Gaban was clapping in 0.1 seconds.
And It should even be a hype thing, not sure why one would even want Sommers instead.
Matter of fact, pray to god Oda never shows the rocky port incident because if Law and BB both get gassed by “idc about power levels “ Oda then Doffy stocks will crash the market
At best Hajrudin will land a strong punch like Momo biting Kaido and using boro breath against GB to show "growth". Oda is not as autistic as dedicated powerscalers but it's wrong to believe he doesn't care.
He is somewhat as autistic as powerscalers as he very much cars about hierarchies. Characters from a lower tier shouldn't be able to defeat character in higher tier not unless there is an unfair advantage.
Being a key figure means he should focus on his personal narrative involving the death of his father. Fighting Dory and Brogy doesn’t push his personal narrative.
I’d be fine if he does something against Gunkimu alongside Luffy and Loki cause a 3v1 against someone who may or may not be responsible for Haralds death makes a lot more narrative sense.
Being a key figure means he should focus on his personal narrative involving the death of his father. Fighting Dory and Brogy doesn’t push his personal narrative.
I’d be fine if he does something against Gunkimu alongside Luffy and Loki cause a 3v1 against someone who may or may not be responsible for Haralds death makes a lot more narrative sense.
Dorry and Broggy were not even present when the shit with Loki and Harald went down. "Narratively" it makes more sense for Hajrudin to interact with someone from the WG who are implied to be involved with the Harald stuff
Being a key figure means he should focus on his personal narrative involving the death of his father. Fighting Dory and Brogy doesn’t push his personal narrative.
I’d be fine if he does something against Gunkimu alongside Luffy and Loki cause a 3v1 against someone who may or may not be responsible for Haralds death makes a lot more narrative sense.
Dorry and Broggy were not even present when the shit with Loki and Harald went down. "Narratively" it makes more sense for Hajrudin to interact with someone from the WG who are implied to be involved with the Harald stuff
That’s why I keep saying “have never even met” these two really don’t do anything for Haralds narrative. And abandoning the narrative entirely is out of character for oda. Even Law and Wyper got moments against their narrative villains. I feel Hajrudin and Loki is more likely to do that.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.