This is fallacious because the two things are not equal. I never said I read Michelle town because she invoked irl devoid of all nuance and context. I said it because it would be unlike her, specifically, to invoke it as mafia because it came across as genuine frustration which simply wouldn't exist as scum. That's not to say AM would, but it's not the same.
This is fallacious because the two things are not equal. I never said I read Michelle town because she invoked irl devoid of all nuance and context. I said it because it would be unlike her, specifically, to invoke it as mafia because it came across as genuine frustration which simply wouldn't exist as scum. That's not to say AM would, but it's not the same.
I doubt you even know what post-hoc means. Me explaining that you're drawing equivalence between two entirely unrelated things to evidence a contradiction in thought is not "post-hoc", if it were then any rebuttal you would have to anything would be so as well.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.