sexual dimorphism entails heterosexuality, necessarily
these type of arguments now sounds more like how i used "natural" tbh.

so again to dismantle this would be to just point to other sexually dimorphic animals, like leaf insects of the genus phyllium
that reproduce sexually but are also capable of parthenogenesis, or many of the sexually dimorphic animals that have homosexual relations, whether casual ones or lasting monogamous relationships (and even adopting young).

so clearly there is no good reason to accept the premise that sexually dimorphic species need to be heterosexual in their behavior.
 
.....Not safe? Lost the plot again
- Dude. Do you understand what it's like to see people talk about One Piece in this forum when you are actually loving the story?

- Do you know what it's like to be a trans women and see people explaining for 3000+ page that trans women are not women without any kind of moderation?

- Do you understand what it's like to be handicaped or with a mental condition and see people call others and yourself autists, retard or parasite every 5 pages without any kind of moderation?

When I say that I'm not considering you as a leftist and when I'm trying to explain how just like any cop you are protecting an oppressive system, I'm referencing to this liberal tendancy of yours to consider free speech (but mostly hatefull rethoric) as a simple difference of opinion that "you can't really act upon on".

You have the power. It's not the rules that make your choices, it's you and your ethics. I can't respect your power here if I see it used without ethics. And by usage I include also the fact of allowing people to spread hate without reacting.

I'm not angry or anything. I'm just trying to wake you up because you are the one mod here who is the closest to understand this principle. Like I said, I'm not doing this to harm the forum, but to make it a better place.

It's a simple question of choice.


nobody but a handful of active members actually cares about this thread.
I'm not talking about this thread specifically.


If we change this to an OP love fest forum it'd die the next day.
It's already dying and it's not because it's fun.

Like Van said he's purposefully beating around the bush. It's like someone saying "I think women should be treated like they were in the 50s" and then when you ask them if they're a misogynist they go "Nope never said women should be beat or treated like living sex dolls or personal maids or anything else that happened in the old days"
The implication is pretty damn obvious either way, but he's trying hard not to cross the line by actively telling us that he just wants gay people to suffer.
We can simply tell him to stop. It's one thing to say it once, it's another to be allowed to spread it for 3000 pages.
 
Last edited:
It's a break week and mods need that homophobic debater to keep going so that the forum keeps its traffic afloat :Armstrong:

Saying outright that he is far-right is unseen among other crackpots of this thread. Usually they say "I believe in my politician who is just a normal conservative" but this idiot said "I'm far-right" and people are still like : well he didn't cross the line.

For the record you cannot be far-right without sharing at least one of the following ideas : sexism, LGBT-phobia, racism or authoritarianism.



here's a "SUPER SAFE PLACE" but it's a ghost town

https://thrillerbark.com/
What is it ? And why is it dead ?
 
here's a "SUPER SAFE PLACE" but it's a ghost town

https://thrillerbark.com/
I don't know this forum, maybe it's just not structured in a way that it make it fun to share.

I actually would love to share more theories and stuff. But look at what happens when I simply try to share a theory HERE ONCE every three week with love because I simply want to have fun with the story:



Why do I have to deal with that when I'm just trying to share a fun theory I had about the story. FFS
 
Top