Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
U r welcome
?????
>>
Sorry, but you do are using a wrong (and problematic) rethoric, and you are not aware of it. It's ok. I'm here to explain. But I will only do that when you will humble down and stop thinking that because you learned the world rationnality or "fallacies", you are being rationnal and critically minded at the moment. Sit down, let me explain, listen, check the sources, and then you will talk about rationnality.
?????
>>
Sorry, but you do are using a wrong (and problematic) rethoric, and you are not aware of it. It's ok. I'm here to explain. But I will only do that when you will humble down and stop thinking that because you learned the world rationnality or "fallacies", you are being rationnal and critically minded at the moment. Sit down, let me explain, listen, check the sources, and then you will talk about rationnality.
Last edited by a moderator:
U r welcome
?????
>>
Sorry, but you do are using a wrong (and problematic) rethoric, and you are not aware of it. It's ok. I'm here to explain. But I will only do that when you will humble down and stop thinking that because you learned the world rationnality or "fallacies", you are being rationnal and critically minded at the moment. Sit down, let me explain, listen, check the sources, and then you will talk about rationnality.
?????
>>
Sorry, but you do are using a wrong (and problematic) rethoric, and you are not aware of it. It's ok. I'm here to explain. But I will only do that when you will humble down and stop thinking that because you learned the world rationnality or "fallacies", you are being rationnal and critically minded at the moment. Sit down, let me explain, listen, check the sources, and then you will talk about rationnality.
Logic does not matter to you or most people here who are trying counter my arguments iwth liberal mindset. What you like is your bias not logic. A logical and rational person would ask: "You wanna convince me? Give me your arguments and your sources" But that's not what you are doing, in all your post, all you do is your best to dodge this question so you don't have to face your biases.
Logic does not matter to you or most people here who are trying counter my arguments iwth liberal mindset. What you like is your bias not logic. A logical and rational person would ask: "You wanna convince me? Give me your arguments and your sources" But that's not what you are doing, in all your post, all you do is your best to dodge this question so you don't have to face your biases.
Case and point again.
>>
The way I see it, I believe you are thinking that it would be incredibly destructing for you to discover that I'm right in the end in any way or form. This would explain why you are dodging so much an explanation and why you are sticking to simple attacks and baseless arguments.
>>
The way I see it, I believe you are thinking that it would be incredibly destructing for you to discover that I'm right in the end in any way or form. This would explain why you are dodging so much an explanation and why you are sticking to simple attacks and baseless arguments.
Case and point again.
>>
The way I see it, I believe you are thinking that it would be incredibly destructing for you to discover that I'm right in the end in any way or form. This would explain why you are dodging so much an explanation and why you are sticking to simple attacks and baseless arguments.
>>
The way I see it, I believe you are thinking that it would be incredibly destructing for you to discover that I'm right in the end in any way or form. This would explain why you are dodging so much an explanation and why you are sticking to simple attacks and baseless arguments.
And does this mean you held back the actual point/explanation so far because reasons?
Yeah. I still haven't explained this slogan and why it's generalizing yet accurate. You see, it's the problem with you guyz. You are sleeping, comfortable in your lives, thinking that you understand the world because someone taught you about critical thinking once. As such, you are unaware of the dawn but also the anger and reality of the world. I'll speak, when you will listen.
Why do you need to reason with hierarchies? I'm not above or below anyone here. I do not consider myself more intelligent or anything than people. I simply know for a fact that I understand something that some people here (you included) do not. If you understood what I'm saying, you would agree, too. Simply because it's the most reasonable and ethical understanding of reality at the moment.
What a joke
I just demonstrated that you read and regurgitate my words through a bias. You transformed me explaining that you don't understand a concept into me explaining that you can't understand a concept, thus justifying your own confirmation bias and conflictual attitude and belief that I was somehow thinking myself as superior.
and in case you didn’t know, don’t and wouldn’t go hand in hand in the English language. The distinction is not that apparent in a conversation and is definitely not something that would stop anyone from continuing on
Are just ignoring what you just did? Do you think people won't notice?
For people who are trying to explain to me how words work, you sure are leanant on avoiding basic language subtilities. No, it's not "hand in hand", it's a major difference that any english person can understand. One implies a present observation of a lack of understanding while the other implies a clear impossibility present or future. Don't try to trick your way out of this. Accept to be wrong and move on.
For people who are trying to explain to me how words work, you sure are leanant on avoiding basic language subtilities. No, it's not "hand in hand", it's a major difference that any english person can understand. One implies a present observation of a lack of understanding while the other implies a clear impossibility present or future. Don't try to trick your way out of this. Accept to be wrong and move on.